Literature DB >> 23407839

Do unattractive friends make you look better? Context-dependent male mating preferences in the guppy.

Clelia Gasparini1, Giovanna Serena, Andrea Pilastro.   

Abstract

Recent theory predicts that in species where females tend to mate with the relatively most ornamented males, males may increase their attractiveness to females, and hence mating success, by preferentially associating with females that are surrounded by less ornamented competitors. Despite this prediction, we still lack explicit experimental evidence that males strategically prefer females surrounded by less attractive competitors to maximize their relative attractiveness. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive test of this hypothesis in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata), a species where a female's perception of a male's attractiveness depends on his coloration relative to that of surrounding males. We found that males preferentially associated with females that were surrounded by relatively drab competitors, and that the strength of an individual male's preference was negatively correlated with his level of ornamentation. A series of control experiments made it possible to exclude the potentially confounding effects of male-male competition or social motivations when drawing these conclusions. The ability of males to choose social context to increase their relative attractiveness has important evolutionary consequences, for example, by contributing towards the maintenance of variability in male sexual ornamentation despite the strong directional selection exerted by female preferences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23407839      PMCID: PMC3574384          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2012.3072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  21 in total

Review 1.  The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence.

Authors:  R Bonduriansky
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2001-08

2.  Female guppies agree to differ: phenotypic and genetic variation in mate-choice behavior and the consequences for sexual selection.

Authors:  R Brooks; J A Endler
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Soay rams target reproductive activity towards promiscuous females' optimal insemination period.

Authors:  B T Preston; I R Stevenson; K Wilson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Sex and the public: Social eavesdropping, sperm competition risk and male mate choice.

Authors:  Martin Plath; David Bierbach
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2011-05

5.  The timing of male reproductive effort relative to female ovulation in a capital breeder.

Authors:  Atle Mysterud; Christophe Bonenfant; Leif Egil Loe; Rolf Langvatn; Nigel G Yoccoz; Nils C Stenseth
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2008-02-25       Impact factor: 5.091

6.  Does competition allow male mate choosiness in threespine sticklebacks?

Authors:  Ulrika Candolin; Tiina Salesto
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 7.  The evolution and significance of male mate choice.

Authors:  Dominic A Edward; Tracey Chapman
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 17.712

8.  Familiarity leads to female mate preference for novel males in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.844

9.  Unexpected male choosiness for mates in a spider.

Authors:  M C Bel-Venner; S Dray; D Allainé; F Menu; S Venner
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Inter-population variation in multiple paternity and reproductive skew in the guppy.

Authors:  Bryan D Neff; Trevor E Pitcher; Indar W Ramnarine
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 6.185

View more
  13 in total

1.  Juvenile social experience affects pairing success at adulthood: congruence with the loser effect?

Authors:  Mylene M Mariette; Charlène Cathaud; Rémi Chambon; Clémentine Vignal
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Do male meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus) always prefer and signal to 'popular' females? The role of social information context.

Authors:  Ryan C Scauzillo; Michael H Ferkin
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Female social response to male sexual harassment in poeciliid fish: a comparison of six species.

Authors:  Marco Dadda
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-09-29

4.  Humans are not fooled by size illusions in attractiveness judgements.

Authors:  Melissa Bateson; Martin J Tovée; Hannah R George; Anton Gouws; Piers L Cornelissen
Journal:  Evol Hum Behav       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.178

5.  Do Males Form Social Associations Based on Sexual Attractiveness in a Fission-Fusion Fish Society?

Authors:  Anne-Christine Auge; Heather L Auld; Thomas N Sherratt; Jean-Guy J Godin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Guppies Show Behavioural but Not Cognitive Sex Differences in a Novel Object Recognition Test.

Authors:  Tyrone Lucon-Xiccato; Marco Dadda
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  The Challenge of Illusory Perception of Animals: The Impact of Methodological Variability in Cross-Species Investigation.

Authors:  Maria Santacà; Christian Agrillo; Maria Elena Miletto Petrazzini
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-30       Impact factor: 2.752

8.  The effects of perceived mating opportunities on patterns of reproductive investment by male guppies.

Authors:  Luke T Barrett; Jonathan P Evans; Clelia Gasparini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Do monkeys compare themselves to others?

Authors:  Vanessa Schmitt; Ira Federspiel; Johanna Eckert; Stefanie Keupp; Laura Tschernek; Lauriane Faraut; Richard Schuster; Corinna Michels; Holger Sennhenn-Reulen; Thomas Bugnyar; Thomas Mussweiler; Julia Fischer
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2015-11-28       Impact factor: 3.084

10.  Sexual and non-sexual social preferences in male and female white-eyed bulbuls.

Authors:  Bekir Kabasakal; Miroslav Poláček; Aziz Aslan; Herbert Hoi; Ali Erdoğan; Matteo Griggio
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.