Literature DB >> 17956402

Survival benefits select for group living in a social spider despite reproductive costs.

T Bilde1, K S Coates, K Birkhofer, T Bird, A A Maklakov, Y Lubin, L Avilés.   

Abstract

The evolution of cooperation requires benefits of group living to exceed costs. Hence, some components of fitness are expected to increase with increasing group size, whereas others may decrease because of competition among group members. The social spiders provide an excellent system to investigate the costs and benefits of group living: they occur in groups of various sizes and individuals are relatively short-lived, therefore life history traits and Lifetime Reproductive Success (LRS) can be estimated as a function of group size. Sociality in spiders has originated repeatedly in phylogenetically distant families and appears to be accompanied by a transition to a system of continuous intra-colony mating and extreme inbreeding. The benefits of group living in such systems should therefore be substantial. We investigated the effect of group size on fitness components of reproduction and survival in the social spider Stegodyphus dumicola in two populations in Namibia. In both populations, the major benefit of group living was improved survival of colonies and late-instar juveniles with increasing colony size. By contrast, female fecundity, female body size and early juvenile survival decreased with increasing group size. Mean individual fitness, estimated as LRS and calculated from five components of reproduction and survival, was maximized for intermediate- to large-sized colonies. Group living in these spiders thus entails a net reproductive cost, presumably because of an increase in intra-colony competition with group size. This cost is traded off against survival benefits at the colony level, which appear to be the major factor favouring group living. In the field, many colonies occur at smaller size than expected from the fitness curve, suggesting ecological or life history constraints on colony persistence which results in a transient population of relatively small colonies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17956402     DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01407.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evol Biol        ISSN: 1010-061X            Impact factor:   2.411


  27 in total

1.  First- and second-order sociality determine survival and reproduction in cooperative cichlids.

Authors:  Arne Jungwirth; Michael Taborsky
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  The Achilles' heel hypothesis: misinformed keystone individuals impair collective learning and reduce group success.

Authors:  Jonathan N Pruitt; Colin M Wright; Carl N Keiser; Alex E DeMarco; Matthew M Grobis; Noa Pinter-Wollman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Cooperative capture of large prey solves scaling challenge faced by spider societies.

Authors:  Eric C Yip; Kimberly S Powers; Leticia Avilés
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Collective behavior and colony persistence of social spiders depends on their physical environment.

Authors:  Ambika Kamath; Skylar D Primavera; Colin M Wright; Grant N Doering; Kirsten A Sheehy; Noa Pinter-Wollman; Jonathan N Pruitt
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2018-12-08       Impact factor: 2.671

5.  Social interactions shape individual and collective personality in social spiders.

Authors:  Edmund R Hunt; Brian Mi; Camila Fernandez; Brandyn M Wong; Jonathan N Pruitt; Noa Pinter-Wollman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Individual differences in boldness influence patterns of social interactions and the transmission of cuticular bacteria among group-mates.

Authors:  Carl N Keiser; Noa Pinter-Wollman; David A Augustine; Michael J Ziemba; Lingran Hao; Jeffrey G Lawrence; Jonathan N Pruitt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Personality composition alters the transmission of cuticular bacteria in social groups.

Authors:  Carl N Keiser; Kimberly A Howell; Noa Pinter-Wollman; Jonathan N Pruitt
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Resting networks and personality predict attack speed in social spiders.

Authors:  Edmund R Hunt; Brian Mi; Rediet Geremew; Camila Fernandez; Brandyn M Wong; Jonathan N Pruitt; Noa Pinter-Wollman
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 2.980

9.  Ecological drivers and reproductive consequences of non-kin cooperation by ant queens.

Authors:  Brian R Haney; Jennifer H Fewell
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  The primary case is not enough: Variation among individuals, groups and social networks modify bacterial transmission dynamics.

Authors:  Carl N Keiser; Noa Pinter-Wollman; Michael J Ziemba; Krishna S Kothamasu; Jonathan N Pruitt
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 5.091

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.