Literature DB >> 28692130

The primary case is not enough: Variation among individuals, groups and social networks modify bacterial transmission dynamics.

Carl N Keiser1,2, Noa Pinter-Wollman3, Michael J Ziemba1, Krishna S Kothamasu1, Jonathan N Pruitt4.   

Abstract

The traits of the primary case of an infectious disease outbreak, and the circumstances for their aetiology, potentially influence the trajectory of transmission dynamics. However, these dynamics likely also depend on the traits of the individuals with whom the primary case interacts. We used the social spider Stegodyphus dumicola to test how the traits of the primary case, group phenotypic composition and group size interact to facilitate the transmission of a GFP-labelled cuticular bacterium. We also compared bacterial transmission across experimentally generated "daisy-chain" vs. "star" networks of social interactions. Finally, we compared social network structure across groups of different sizes. Groups of 10 spiders experienced more bacterial transmission events compared to groups of 30 spiders, regardless of groups' behavioural composition. Groups containing only one bold spider experienced the lowest levels of bacterial transmission regardless of group size. We found no evidence for the traits of the primary case influencing any transmission dynamics. In a second experiment, bacteria were transmitted to more individuals in experimentally induced star networks than in daisy-chains, on which transmission never exceeded three steps. In both experimental network types, transmission success depended jointly on the behavioural traits of the interacting individuals; however, the behavioural traits of the primary case were only important for transmission on star networks. Larger social groups exhibited lower interaction density (i.e. had a low ratio of observed to possible connections) and were more modular, i.e. they had more connections between nodes within a subgroup and fewer connections across subgroups. Thus, larger groups may restrict transmission by forming fewer interactions and by isolating subgroups that interacted with the primary case. These findings suggest that accounting for the traits of single exposed hosts has less power in predicting transmission dynamics compared to the larger scale factors of the social groups in which they reside. Factors like group size and phenotypic composition appear to alter social interaction patterns, which leads to differential transmission of microbes.
© 2017 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2017 British Ecological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  primary case; social network; social spider; trait variation; transmission heterogeneity

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28692130      PMCID: PMC5871623          DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12729

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  35 in total

1.  The construction and analysis of epidemic trees with reference to the 2001 UK foot-and-mouth outbreak.

Authors:  D T Haydon; M Chase-Topping; D J Shaw; L Matthews; J K Friar; J Wilesmith; M E J Woolhouse
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Shyness and boldness in humans and other animals.

Authors:  D Sloan Wilson; A B Clark; K Coleman; T Dearstyne
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  Eight challenges in modelling disease ecology in multi-host, multi-agent systems.

Authors:  Michael G Buhnerkempe; Mick G Roberts; Andrew P Dobson; Hans Heesterbeek; Peter J Hudson; James O Lloyd-Smith
Journal:  Epidemics       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 4.396

4.  Personality composition is more important than group size in determining collective foraging behaviour in the wild.

Authors:  Carl N Keiser; Jonathan N Pruitt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Inferring the origin of an epidemic with a dynamic message-passing algorithm.

Authors:  Andrey Y Lokhov; Marc Mézard; Hiroki Ohta; Lenka Zdeborová
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2014-07-01

6.  Personality composition alters the transmission of cuticular bacteria in social groups.

Authors:  Carl N Keiser; Kimberly A Howell; Noa Pinter-Wollman; Jonathan N Pruitt
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  How social structures, space, and behaviors shape the spread of infectious diseases using chikungunya as a case study.

Authors:  Henrik Salje; Justin Lessler; Kishor Kumar Paul; Andrew S Azman; M Waliur Rahman; Mahmudur Rahman; Derek Cummings; Emily S Gurley; Simon Cauchemez
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Skin microbes on frogs prevent morbidity and mortality caused by a lethal skin fungus.

Authors:  Reid N Harris; Robert M Brucker; Jenifer B Walke; Matthew H Becker; Christian R Schwantes; Devon C Flaherty; Brianna A Lam; Douglas C Woodhams; Cheryl J Briggs; Vance T Vredenburg; Kevin P C Minbiole
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 10.302

9.  Can Simple Transmission Chains Foster Collective Intelligence in Binary-Choice Tasks?

Authors:  Mehdi Moussaïd; Kyanoush Seyed Yahosseini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Cohabiting family members share microbiota with one another and with their dogs.

Authors:  Se Jin Song; Christian Lauber; Elizabeth K Costello; Catherine A Lozupone; Gregory Humphrey; Donna Berg-Lyons; J Gregory Caporaso; Dan Knights; Jose C Clemente; Sara Nakielny; Jeffrey I Gordon; Noah Fierer; Rob Knight
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 8.140

View more
  4 in total

1.  Social interactions shape individual and collective personality in social spiders.

Authors:  Edmund R Hunt; Brian Mi; Camila Fernandez; Brandyn M Wong; Jonathan N Pruitt; Noa Pinter-Wollman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Social spider webs harbour largely consistent bacterial communities across broad spatial scales.

Authors:  Carl N Keiser; Tobin J Hammer; Jonathan N Pruitt
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Predictors of colony extinction vary by habitat type in social spiders.

Authors:  Brendan L McEwen; James L L Lichtenstein; David N Fisher; Colin M Wright; Greg T Chism; Noa Pinter-Wollman; Jonathan N Pruitt
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  Decline and fall: The causes of group failure in cooperatively breeding meerkats.

Authors:  Chris Duncan; Marta B Manser; Tim Clutton-Brock
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 3.167

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.