Literature DB >> 26582022

First- and second-order sociality determine survival and reproduction in cooperative cichlids.

Arne Jungwirth1, Michael Taborsky2.   

Abstract

Cooperative breeders serve as a model to study the evolution of cooperation, where costs and benefits of helping are typically scrutinized at the level of group membership. However, cooperation is often observed in multi-level social organizations involving interactions among individuals at various levels. Here, we argue that a full understanding of the adaptive value of cooperation and the evolution of complex social organization requires identifying the effect of different levels of social organization on direct and indirect fitness components. Our long-term field data show that in the cooperatively breeding, colonial cichlid fish Neolamprologus pulcher, both large group size and high colony density significantly raised group persistence. Neither group size nor density affected survival at the individual level, but they had interactive effects on reproductive output; large group size raised productivity when local population density was low, whereas in contrast, small groups were more productive at high densities. Fitness estimates of individually marked fish revealed indirect fitness benefits associated with staying in large groups. Inclusive fitness, however, was not significantly affected by group size, because the direct fitness component was not increased in larger groups. Together, our findings highlight that the reproductive output of groups may be affected in opposite directions by different levels of sociality, and that complex forms of sociality and costly cooperation may evolve in the absence of large indirect fitness benefits and the influence of kin selection.
© 2015 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  altruism; cooperation; social complexity; social evolution

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26582022      PMCID: PMC4685815          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2015.1971

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  29 in total

Review 1.  Breeding together: kin selection and mutualism in cooperative vertebrates.

Authors:  Tim Clutton-Brock
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-04-05       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Direct benefits and the evolution of female-biased cooperative breeding in Seychelles warblers.

Authors:  David S Richardson; Terry Burke; Jan Komdeur
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Unrelated helpers will not fully compensate for costs imposed on breeders when they pay to stay.

Authors:  Ian M Hamilton; Michael Taborsky
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  The role of group size and environmental factors on survival in a cooperatively breeding tropical passerine.

Authors:  Lyanne Brouwer; David S Richardson; Cas Eikenaar; Jan Komdeur
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.091

5.  Behavioral ecology: social organization in fission-fusion societies.

Authors:  Iain D Couzin
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2006-03-07       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 6.  Integrating cooperative breeding into theoretical concepts of cooperation.

Authors:  Ralph Bergmüller; Rufus A Johnstone; Andrew F Russell; Redouan Bshary
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2007-07-10       Impact factor: 1.777

Review 7.  Evolutionary explanations for cooperation.

Authors:  Stuart A West; Ashleigh S Griffin; Andy Gardner
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  The evolution of cooperative breeding through group augmentation.

Authors:  H Kokko; R A Johnstone; T H Clutton-Brock
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Complex social organization reflects genetic structure and relatedness in the cooperatively breeding bell miner, Manorina melanophrys.

Authors:  J N Painter; R H Crozier; A Poiani; R J Robertson; M F Clarke
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 6.185

10.  Helpers in a cooperatively breeding cichlid stay and pay or disperse and breed, depending on ecological constraints.

Authors:  Ralph Bergmüller; Dik Heg; Michael Taborsky
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  6 in total

1.  Predation risk drives social complexity in cooperative breeders.

Authors:  Frank Groenewoud; Joachim Gerhard Frommen; Dario Josi; Hirokazu Tanaka; Arne Jungwirth; Michael Taborsky
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Age- and sex-dependent variation in relatedness corresponds to reproductive skew, territory inheritance, and workload in cooperatively breeding cichlids.

Authors:  Dario Josi; Dik Heg; Tomohiro Takeyama; Danielle Bonfils; Dmitry A Konovalov; Joachim G Frommen; Masanori Kohda; Michael Taborsky
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 4.171

3.  Ultimate and proximate mechanisms of reciprocal altruism in rats.

Authors:  Vassilissa Dolivo; Claudia Rutte; Michael Taborsky
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  Aggression towards shared enemies by heterospecific and conspecific cichlid fish neighbours.

Authors:  Topi K Lehtonen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2019-08-31       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Decline and fall: The causes of group failure in cooperatively breeding meerkats.

Authors:  Chris Duncan; Marta B Manser; Tim Clutton-Brock
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 3.167

6.  Stochasticity and non-additivity expose hidden evolutionary pathways to cooperation.

Authors:  Sarah E Fumagalli; Sean H Rice
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.