Literature DB >> 15847976

Biases in internet sexual health samples: comparison of an internet sexuality survey and a national sexual health survey in Sweden.

Michael W Ross1, Sven-Axel Månsson, Kristian Daneback, Al Cooper, Ronny Tikkanen.   

Abstract

The internet is becoming a favored technology for carrying out survey research, and particularly sexual health research. However, its utility is limited by unresolved sampling questions such as how biased internet samples may be. This paper addresses this issue through comparison of a 'gold standard' random selection population-based sexual survey (The Swedish Sexual Life Survey) with an internet-based survey in Sweden which used identical demographic, sexual and relationship questions, to ascertain the biases and degree of comparability between the recruitment methods. On the internet questionnaire, there were significant differences between males and females on all the measured indices. There were no significant differences in proportions of males and females, or nationality, between the two samples. However, the internet samples for both males and females were significantly more likely to be younger, originally from and currently living in a major city, better educated, and more likely to be students and less likely to be retired. Relationship variables were less likely to be significantly different between samples: there were no differences for males or females between the SSS and the internet samples on having been in a committed relationship, and how they met their present partner, nor for males in having discussed separation in the past year. However, there was a higher proportion of people attracted to the same sex, and higher numbers of sex partners (as well as a higher proportion of people reporting no sex) in the past year, in the internet sample. These data suggest that apart from the demographics of age, location, and education, currently being in a committed relationship, and the number of sex partners in the past year, internet samples are comparable for relationship characteristics and history with a national sexual life survey. Comparison of internet data with random survey data in other western countries should occur to determine if these patterns are replicated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15847976     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.01.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  19 in total

1.  HIV risk behaviors in the U.S. transgender population: prevalence and predictors in a large internet sample.

Authors:  Jamie Feldman; Rebecca Swinburne Romine; Walter O Bockting
Journal:  J Homosex       Date:  2014

2.  What Asexuality Contributes to the Same-Sex Marriage Discussion.

Authors:  Kristin S Scherrer
Journal:  J Gay Lesbian Soc Serv       Date:  2010-01-01

3.  The Epidemiologic Toolbox: Identifying, Honing, and Using the Right Tools for the Job.

Authors:  Catherine R Lesko; Alexander P Keil; Jessie K Edwards
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  HIV risk and substance use in men who have sex with men surveyed in bathhouses, bars/clubs, and on Craigslist.org: venue of recruitment matters.

Authors:  Christian Grov
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2012-05

5.  Men who have sex with men in Great Britain: comparison of a self-selected internet sample with a national probability sample.

Authors:  Alison Ruth Evans; Richard D Wiggins; Catherine H Mercer; Graham J Bolding; Jonathan Elford
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.519

6.  The Effects of Survey Administration on Disclosure Rates to Sensitive Items Among Men: A Comparison of an Internet Panel Sample with a RDD Telephone Sample.

Authors:  Denise A Hines; Emily M Douglas; Sehar Mahmood
Journal:  Comput Human Behav       Date:  2010-11-01

7.  Feasibility of recruiting a birth cohort through the Internet: the experience of the NINFEA cohort.

Authors:  Lorenzo Richiardi; Iacopo Baussano; Loredana Vizzini; Jeroen Douwes; Neil Pearce; Franco Merletti
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 8.082

8.  Feasibility of using web-based questionnaires in large population-based epidemiological studies.

Authors:  Alexandra Ekman; Paul W Dickman; Asa Klint; Elisabete Weiderpass; Jan-Eric Litton
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 8.082

9.  Conducting Internet Research With the Transgender Population: Reaching Broad Samples and Collecting Valid Data.

Authors:  Michael H Miner; Walter O Bockting; Rebecca Swinburne Romine; Sivakumaran Raman
Journal:  Soc Sci Comput Rev       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 4.578

10.  Internalised homonegativity predicts HIV-associated risk behavior in European men who have sex with men in a 38-country cross-sectional study: some public health implications of homophobia.

Authors:  Michael W Ross; Rigmor C Berg; Axel J Schmidt; Harm J Hospers; Michele Breveglieri; Martina Furegato; Peter Weatherburn
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.