Literature DB >> 3618491

Comparison of two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography and intracardiac hemodynamics for quantification of mitral stenosis.

M A Gonzalez, J S Child, J Krivokapich.   

Abstract

Forty-three patients with mitral stenosis (MS) were studied to assess the relation of catheter-derived pressure gradient half-time (P 1/2), mitral valve areas (calculated by the Gorlin formula and 2-dimensional echocardiography [2-D echo]) to mitral valve areas derived from Doppler pressure half-time (T 1/2) in order to establish an accurate line-drawing method in nonlinear velocity tracings and to revalidate the use of the empiric constant of 220 ms as the T 1/2 that predicts a 1.0-cm2 mitral valve area. Mitral valve area could be quantified by 2-D echo in 39 of 43 patients and by Doppler in 31 of 34 patients, for a success rate of 91%. A reliable technique for measuring Doppler T 1/2 in nonlinear Doppler velocity tracings was a "mid-diastolic" line-drawing method, validated with the "anatomic" mitral valve area by 2-D echo (r = 0.89) and with the "hemodynamic" mitral valve area by the Gorlin formula (in pure MS without regurgitation) (r = 0.95). By both Doppler T 1/2 and hemodynamic P 1/2, the use of 220 ms to predict a mitral valve area of 1.0 cm2 was validated. Each T 1/2 and P 1/2 had an exponential inverse relation to the mitral valve area by the Gorlin formula in pure MS. Doppler and 2-D echocardiographic quantification of MS are complementary. Reliable measurement of T 1/2 in nonlinear velocity tracings is achieved by a mid-diastolic line-drawing method and use of the equation 220 ms/T 1/2 = mitral valve area accurately quantifies MS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3618491     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(87)90236-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  6 in total

1.  Value of a modified continuity equation method to quantify mitral valve area in patients with mitral stenosis and sinus rhythm.

Authors:  W Voelker; B Regele; H Dittmann; M Schmid; M Mauser; V Kühlkamp; K R Karsch
Journal:  Klin Wochenschr       Date:  1991-12-11

2.  Quantification of mitral valve stenosis by three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography.

Authors:  I Kupferwasser; S Mohr-Kahaly; T Menzel; M Spiecker; G Dohmen; E Mayer; H Oelert; R Erbel; J Meyer
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1996-12

Review 3.  Current diagnostic and treatment strategies for Lutembacher syndrome: the pivotal role of echocardiography.

Authors:  Leopold Ndemnge Aminde; Anastase Dzudie; Noah Fongwen Takah; Kathleen Blackett Ngu; Karen Sliwa; Andre Pascal Kengne
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2015-04

4.  Intraoperative Evaluation of Mitral Stenosis by Transesophageal Echocardiography.

Authors:  Anne D Cherry; Cory D Maxwell; Alina Nicoara
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 5.108

5.  The impact of cardiac rhythm on the mitral valve area and gradient in patients with mitral stenosis.

Authors:  Hasan Arı; Selma Arı; Alper Karakuş; Sencer Camcı; Kübra Doğanay; Ahmet Tütüncü; Mehmet Melek; Tahsin Bozat
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 1.596

Review 6.  The Role of 2D and 3D Echo in Mitral Stenosis.

Authors:  Juan Manuel Monteagudo Ruiz; José Luis Zamorano Gómez
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Dev Dis       Date:  2021-12-03
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.