Literature DB >> 3168200

Inaccuracy of mitral pressure half-time immediately after percutaneous mitral valvotomy. Dependence on transmitral gradient and left atrial and ventricular compliance.

J D Thomas1, G T Wilkins, C Y Choong, V M Abascal, I F Palacios, P C Block, A E Weyman.   

Abstract

Mitral pressure half-time (T1/2) is widely used as an independent measure of mitral valve area in patients undergoing percutaneous mitral valvotomy. However, fluid dynamics theory predicts T1/2 to be strongly dependent on chamber compliance and the peak transmitral gradient, which are variables that change dramatically with valvotomy. These theoretical predictions were tested in an in vitro model of the left heart where valve area, chamber compliance, and initial gradient were independently adjusted. Measured T1/2 was observed to vary inversely with orifice area and directly with net chamber compliance and the square root of the initial pressure gradient. Theoretical predictions of T1/2 agreed with observed values with r = 0.998. To test this theory in vivo, the hemodynamic tracings of 18 patients undergoing mitral valvotomy were reviewed. Predictions were made for T1/2 assuming dependence only on valve area; these showed some correlations before valvotomy (r = 0.48-0.64, p less than 0.05) but none after valvotomy (r = 0.05-0.28, p = NS). Predictions for T1/2 based on the theoretical derivation (and thus including compliance and pressure in their calculation) were much better: before valvotomy, r = 0.93-0.96, p less than 0.0001; after valvotomy, r = 0.52-0.66, p less than 0.05. These data indicate that T1/2 is not an independent inverse measure of mitral valve area but is also directly proportional to net chamber compliance and the square root of the initial transmitral gradient. These other factors render T1/2 an unreliable measure of mitral valve area in the setting of acute mitral valvotomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3168200     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.78.4.980

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  24 in total

1.  Numerical modeling of ventricular filling.

Authors:  J D Thomas; A E Weyman
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 2.  [Aortic stenosis].

Authors:  W G Daniel; H Baumgartner; C Gohlke-Bärwolf; P Hanrath; D Horstkotte; K C Koch; A Mügge; H J Schäfers; F A Flachskampf
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.460

3.  Three-dimensional ultrasound imaging model of mitral valve regurgitation: design and evaluation.

Authors:  Stephen H Little; Stephen R Igo; Marti McCulloch; Craig J Hartley; Yukihiko Nosé; William A Zoghbi
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2008-02-06       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Value of a modified continuity equation method to quantify mitral valve area in patients with mitral stenosis and sinus rhythm.

Authors:  W Voelker; B Regele; H Dittmann; M Schmid; M Mauser; V Kühlkamp; K R Karsch
Journal:  Klin Wochenschr       Date:  1991-12-11

5.  Significance of commissural calcification on outcome of mitral balloon valvotomy.

Authors:  N Sutaria; D B Northridge; T R Shaw
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 6.  Stenotic lesions.

Authors:  B Wranne; H Baumgartner; F Flachskampf; M Hasenkam; F Pinto
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 7.  Current diagnostic and treatment strategies for Lutembacher syndrome: the pivotal role of echocardiography.

Authors:  Leopold Ndemnge Aminde; Anastase Dzudie; Noah Fongwen Takah; Kathleen Blackett Ngu; Karen Sliwa; Andre Pascal Kengne
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2015-04

8.  Impact of 3D echocardiography on grading of mitral stenosis and prediction of clinical events.

Authors:  C Bleakley; M Eskandari; O Aldalati; K Monschonas; M Huang; A Whittaker; M J Monaghan
Journal:  Echo Res Pract       Date:  2018-08-23

Review 9.  Three-dimensional echocardiography. New possibilities in mitral valve assessment.

Authors:  Jorge Solis; Marta Sitges; Robert A Levine; Judy Hung
Journal:  Rev Esp Cardiol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.753

10.  Impact of net atrioventricular compliance on clinical outcome in mitral stenosis.

Authors:  Maria Carmo P Nunes; Judy Hung; Marcia M Barbosa; William A Esteves; Vinicius T Carvalho; Lucas Lodi-Junqueira; Cirilo P Fonseca Neto; Timothy C Tan; Robert A Levine
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 7.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.