Literature DB >> 17952523

Hand-sewn cervical anastomosis versus stapled intrathoracic anastomosis after esophagectomy for middle or lower thoracic esophageal cancer: a prospective randomized controlled study.

Manabu Okuyama1, Satoru Motoyama, Hiroyuki Suzuki, Reijiro Saito, Kiyotomi Maruyama, Jun-Ichi Ogawa.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The type of anastomosis and its outcome can affect postoperative morbidity, mortality, and quality of life after esophagectomy. We compared the outcomes of cervical hand-sewn anastomosis (CHS) and intrathoracic stapled anastomosis (ITS) performed after esophagectomy and gastric reconstruction.
METHODS: Thirty-two patients with middle or lower thoracic esophageal cancer were prospectively randomized to undergo CHS (n = 18) or ITS (n = 14) after esophagectomy. We compared clinical data, postoperative symptoms, and long-term survival in the two groups.
RESULTS: The rates of anastomotic leak and stricture in the CHS and ITS groups were 16.7% versus 7.1% and 0% versus 14.2%, respectively, which do not represent significant differences. The respective rates of recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy were 38.8% versus 7.1% (P < 0.05), and proximal esophageal resection was 15 mm longer (P < 0.05) in the CHS group. There were no significant differences in symptoms 6 months after surgery, or in the overall 5-year survival rates (72.2% and 85.7%, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: The two methods of anastomosis yielded similar anastomotic outcomes. Although the incidence of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury was higher after CHS, and proximal esophageal resection was longer, this had little impact on postoperative symptoms and long-term survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17952523     DOI: 10.1007/s00595-007-3541-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Today        ISSN: 0941-1291            Impact factor:   2.549


  20 in total

1.  Manual compared with mechanical cervical oesophagogastric anastomosis: a randomised trial.

Authors:  E Laterza; G de' Manzoni; G F Veraldi; A Guglielmi; P Tedesco; C Cordiano
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  1999-11

2.  Handsewn or stapled esophagogastric anastomoses after esophagectomy for cancer: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  J D Urschel; C J Blewett; W F Bennett; J D Miller; J E Young
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.429

3.  Analysis of results of surgery performed over a 20-year period on 500 patients with cancer of the thoracic esophagus.

Authors:  S Abo; M Kitamura; M Hashimoto; K Izumi; Y Minamiya; T Shikama; H Suzuki; K Temma; S Kamata; R Saito
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Appraisal of ten-year survival following esophagectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus with emphasis on quality of life.

Authors:  M Baba; T Aikou; S Natsugoe; C Kusano; M Shimada; S Kimura; T Fukumoto
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1997 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  S Law; M Fok; K M Chu; J Wong
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Operative procedures of reconstruction after resection of esophageal cancer and the postoperative quality of life.

Authors:  H Kuwano; M Ikebe; K Baba; K Kitamura; Y Toh; H Matsuda; K Sugimachi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1993 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a comparison of thoracic and cervical anastomoses.

Authors:  C J Blewett; J D Miller; J E Young; W F Bennett; J D Urschel
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 1.520

8.  Prospective analysis of quality of life after surgical resection for esophageal cancer: preliminary results.

Authors:  Jo Ann Brooks; Kenneth A Kesler; Cynthia S Johnson; Donato Ciaccia; John W Brown
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.454

9.  Comparison of manual and mechanical cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Hsao-Hsun Hsu; Jin-Shing Chen; Pei-Ming Huang; Jang-Ming Lee; Yung-Chie Lee
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.191

10.  Quality of life associated with surgery for esophageal cancer: differences between collar and intrathoracic anastomoses.

Authors:  Christian E Schmidt; Beate Bestmann; Thomas Küchler; Andreas Schmid; Bernd Kremer
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2004-03-04       Impact factor: 3.352

View more
  27 in total

1.  Effects of hospital and surgeon case-volumes on postoperative complications and length of stay after esophagectomy in Japan.

Authors:  Hideo Yasunaga; Yutaka Matsuyama; Kazuhiko Ohe
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2009-06-28       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 2.  Hand-sewn versus stapled oesophago-gastric anastomosis: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sheraz R Markar; Alan Karthikesalingam; Soumil Vyas; Majid Hashemi; Mark Winslet
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Preventing and localizing esophagogastric anastomosis leakage by sleeve-wrapping of the pedicled omentum.

Authors:  Quan-Xing Liu; Xu-Feng Deng; Bing Hou; Jia-Xin Min; Ji-Gang Dai
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Is hand sewing comparable with stapling for anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Quan-Xing Liu; Jia-Xin Min; Xu-Feng Deng; Ji-Gang Dai
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Should oesophagectomy be performed with cervical or intrathoracic anastomosis?

Authors:  Babar Kayani; Omar A Jarral; Thanos Athanasiou; Emmanouil Zacharakis
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-02-24

6.  Single-layer continuous suture contributes to the reduction of surgical complications in digestive tract anastomosis involving special anatomical locations.

Authors:  Guo-Cai Li; Yu-Chun Zhang; Yong Xu; Fang-Cheng Zhang; Wei-Hua Huang; Jian-Qing Xu; Qing-Jiu Ma
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-11-15

7.  Expedite recovery from esophagectomy and reconstruction for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after perioperative management protocol reinvention.

Authors:  Yu-Wei Liu; Fan-Wei Yan; Dong-Lin Tsai; Hsien-Pin Li; Yen-Lung Lee; Hung-Hsing Chiang; Hung-Te Hsu; Hung-Yi Chuang; Shah-Hwa Chou
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  Esophagectomy via left thoracotomy for esophageal cancer with situs inversus totalis: report of a case.

Authors:  Takahiro Mimae; Isao Nozaki; Akira Kurita; Shigemitsu Takashima
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 2.549

9.  The triangulating stapling technique for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy.

Authors:  Yasushi Toh; Yoshihisa Sakaguchi; Osamu Ikeda; Eisuke Adachi; Kippei Ohgaki; Yoichi Yamashita; Eiji Oki; Kazuhito Minami; Takeshi Okamura
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 10.  Surgery of esophageal cancer.

Authors:  F G Uzunoglu; M Reeh; A Kutup; J R Izbicki
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 3.445

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.