Literature DB >> 24649327

Single-layer continuous suture contributes to the reduction of surgical complications in digestive tract anastomosis involving special anatomical locations.

Guo-Cai Li1, Yu-Chun Zhang1, Yong Xu1, Fang-Cheng Zhang1, Wei-Hua Huang1, Jian-Qing Xu1, Qing-Jiu Ma1.   

Abstract

The key point of digestive cancer surgery is reconstruction and anastomosis of the digestive tract. Traditional anastomoses involve double-layer interrupted suturing, manually or using a surgical stapler. In special anatomical locations, however, suturing may become increasingly difficult and the complication rate increases accordingly. In this study, we aimed to investigate the feasibility and safety of a new manual suturing method, the single-layer continuous suture in the posterior wall of the anastomosis. Between January, 2007 and August, 2012, 101 patients with digestive cancer underwent surgery in Xi'an Gaoxin Hospital. Of those patients, 27 underwent surgery with the new manual method and the remaining 74 underwent surgery using traditional methods of anastomosis of the digestive tract. Surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, drainage duration, complications, blood tests, postoperative quality of life (QOL) and overall expenditure were recorded and analyzed. No significant differences were observed in surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, temperature, blood tests and postoperative QOL between the two groups. However, compared with the control group, the new manual suture group exhibited a lower surgical complication rate (7.40 vs. 31.08%; P=0.018), lower blood transfusion volume (274.07±419.33 vs. 646.67±1,146.06 ml; P=0.053), shorter postoperative hospital stay (14.60±4.19 vs. 17.60±6.29 days; P=0.038) and lower overall expenditure (3,509.85±768.68 vs. 6,141.83±308.90 renminbi; P=0.001). Our results suggested that single-layer continuous suturing for the anastomosis of the digestive tract is feasible and safe and may contribute to the reduction of surgical complications and overall expenditure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anastomosis; continuous suture; gastric cancer; rectal cancer; single-layer

Year:  2013        PMID: 24649327      PMCID: PMC3916195          DOI: 10.3892/mco.2013.215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol        ISSN: 2049-9450


  30 in total

Review 1.  Hand-sewn versus stapled oesophago-gastric anastomosis: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sheraz R Markar; Alan Karthikesalingam; Soumil Vyas; Majid Hashemi; Mark Winslet
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  S Law; M Fok; K M Chu; J Wong
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Blood flow in colonic anastomoses. Effect of stapling and suturing.

Authors:  R S Chung
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Continuous versus interrupted sutures for repair of episiotomy or second-degree perineal tears: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  P Valenzuela; M S Saiz Puente; J L Valero; R Azorín; R Ortega; R Guijarro
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 6.531

5.  Prevalence and risk factors for ischemia, leak, and stricture of esophageal anastomosis: gastric pull-up versus colon interposition.

Authors:  John W Briel; Anand P Tamhankar; Jeffrey A Hagen; Steven R DeMeester; Jan Johansson; Emmanouel Choustoulakis; Jeffrey H Peters; Cedric G Bremner; Tom R DeMeester
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.113

6.  Quality of life in rectal cancer patients: a four-year prospective study.

Authors:  Jutta Engel; Jacqueline Kerr; Anne Schlesinger-Raab; Renate Eckel; Hansjörg Sauer; Dieter Hölzel
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Esophagogastric anastomosis performed with a stapler: the occurrence of leakage and stricture.

Authors:  J Wong; H Cheung; R Lui; Y W Fan; A Smith; K F Siu
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 3.982

8.  Stapler design and strictures at the esophagogastric anastomosis.

Authors:  R G Berrisford; R D Page; R J Donnelly
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  Standardized technique of laparoscopic intracorporeal rectal transection and anastomosis for low anterior resection.

Authors:  Hiroya Kuroyanagi; Masatoshi Oya; Masashi Ueno; Yoshiya Fujimoto; Toshiharu Yamaguchi; Tetsuichiro Muto
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Stapled ileal pouch anal anastomoses are safer than handsewn anastomoses in patients with ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  Y Ziv; V W Fazio; J M Church; I C Lavery; T M King; P Ambrosetti
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.565

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.