Literature DB >> 25473184

Preventing and localizing esophagogastric anastomosis leakage by sleeve-wrapping of the pedicled omentum.

Quan-Xing Liu1, Xu-Feng Deng1, Bing Hou1, Jia-Xin Min1, Ji-Gang Dai1.   

Abstract

AIM: To develop a technique of sleeve-wrapping the pedicled omentum around the esophagogastric anastomosis for preventing and localizing leakage.
METHODS: This study includes data from 86 patients who were diagnosed with esophageal cancer and underwent the technique of sleeve-wrapping the pedicled omentum around esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy between November 2011 and July 2013. The early complications that occurred during follow-up were analyzed.
RESULTS: Postoperative complications included pulmonary complications (13/86; 15.1%) and abdominal or thoracic wound infection (3/86; 3.5%). Complications that occurred during follow-up included one case of anastomosis leakage (limited by omentum; 1.2%) and five case of anastomosis stricture (5.8%). No deaths occurred. All complications were resolved through traditional treatment. No additional surgery was needed.
CONCLUSION: Sleeve-wrapping of the pedicled omentum around esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy is safe and effective for preventing and localizing anastomosis leakage without increasing anastomosis stricture.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anastomotic leakage; Esophageal cancer; Esophagectomy; Esophagogastrostomy; Pedicled omentum

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25473184      PMCID: PMC4239518          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i43.16282

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  18 in total

1.  Manual compared with mechanical cervical oesophagogastric anastomosis: a randomised trial.

Authors:  E Laterza; G de' Manzoni; G F Veraldi; A Guglielmi; P Tedesco; C Cordiano
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  1999-11

2.  Omentoplasty versus no omentoplasty for cervical esophagogastrostomy following radical esophagectomy.

Authors:  Susumu Ohwada; Tetsushi Ogawa; Susumu Kawate; Toru Koyama; Tatsuya Yamada; Sumihiko Yoshimura; Yoshihiro Sato; Naoki Tomizawa; Toshihiro Ohya; Yasuo Morishita
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb

3.  A prospective randomized study comparing stapled with handsewn oesophagogastric anastomoses.

Authors:  S R Craig; W S Walker; E W Cameron; A J Wightman
Journal:  J R Coll Surg Edinb       Date:  1996-02

4.  Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  S Law; M Fok; K M Chu; J Wong
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Omentoplasty versus no omentoplasty for esophagogastrostomy after surgery for cancer of cardia and esophagus.

Authors:  Binay Thakur; Chun Shan Zhang; Zhen Bo Tan
Journal:  Indian J Cancer       Date:  2004 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.224

6.  Transthoracic versus transhiatal resection for carcinoma of the esophagus: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  J B Hulscher; J G Tijssen; H Obertop; J J van Lanschot
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 7.  Esophagogastrostomy anastomotic leaks complicating esophagectomy: a review.

Authors:  J D Urschel
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Transthoracic esophagectomy with radical mediastinal and abdominal lymph node dissection and cervical esophagogastrostomy for esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  S J Swanson; H F Batirel; R Bueno; M T Jaklitsch; J M Lukanich; E Allred; S J Mentzer; D J Sugarbaker
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Outcome of histologically node-negative esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Yoichi Tabira; Masahiro Yasunaga; Tomonori Sakaguchi; Yuji Yamaguchi; Toshiyuki Okuma; Michio Kawasuji
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2002-09-26       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Clinical outcomes of extended esophagectomy with three-field lymph node dissection for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Mitsuo Tachibana; Shoichi Kinugasa; Hiroshi Yoshimura; Muneaki Shibakita; Yasuhito Tonomoto; Dipok Kumar Dhar; Naofumi Nagasue
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.565

View more
  3 in total

1.  Mediastinal transposition of the omentum reduces infection severity and pharmacy cost for patients undergoing esophagectomy.

Authors:  Peng Ye; Jin-Lin Cao; Qiu-Yuan Li; Zhi-Tian Wang; Yun-Hai Yang; Wang Lv; Jian Hu
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Anastomotic reinforcement with omentoplasty reduces anastomotic leakage for minimally invasive esophagectomy with cervical anastomosis.

Authors:  Dong Zhou; Quan-Xing Liu; Xu-Feng Deng; Hong Zheng; Xiao Lu; Ji-Gang Dai; Li Jiang
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 3.989

3.  Impact of postoperative complications on survival after oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  J R Bundred; A C Hollis; R Evans; J Hodson; J L Whiting; E A Griffiths
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2020-02-17
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.