Yu-Wei Liu1, Fan-Wei Yan1, Dong-Lin Tsai1, Hsien-Pin Li1, Yen-Lung Lee1, Hung-Hsing Chiang1, Hung-Te Hsu2, Hung-Yi Chuang3, Shah-Hwa Chou1,4. 1. Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. 2. Department of Anesthesia, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. 3. Department of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. 4. Department of Respiratory Therapy, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Surgery for esophageal cancer is invasive and challenging, and always to be followed with arduous post-operative care and recovery. This study, maybe one of the first in Asian populations, is to determine whether a reinvented protocol for perioperative management for esophageal cancer surgery which is being implemented in our department, will lead to a faster convalescence and also significantly decrease financial burdens garnered by patients during hospitalization. METHODS: Operated on by the same surgeon and team in the same hospital, consecutive patients who had received esophagectomy and reconstruction for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma were retrospectively reviewed. On the basis of two different treatment periods, patients were divided into two groups: A and B. Group A was patients who had received the new reinvented protocol between 2012 and 2016, while group B patients were those having received the previous protocol between 2008 and 2011. Their demographics, post-operative outcome, and hospital charges were collected and compared. RESULTS: There were 64 patients in group A, and 69 in group B. Ventilator days (P<0.001), ICU stay (P<0.001), and post-operative stay (P<0.001) were significantly shorter in group A patients. Complication rates were similar between the two groups. No hospital mortality was noted in either group. Hospital charges in group A were found to be perceptively lower, although not statistically significant (P value =0.078). CONCLUSIONS: The current protocol of perioperative care effectively ameliorated convalescence after esophagectomy and reconstruction for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma without increasing complication rate or mortality. It is also potentially more practical in future health care policies during this era of financial shortage.
BACKGROUND: Surgery for esophageal cancer is invasive and challenging, and always to be followed with arduous post-operative care and recovery. This study, maybe one of the first in Asian populations, is to determine whether a reinvented protocol for perioperative management for esophageal cancer surgery which is being implemented in our department, will lead to a faster convalescence and also significantly decrease financial burdens garnered by patients during hospitalization. METHODS: Operated on by the same surgeon and team in the same hospital, consecutive patients who had received esophagectomy and reconstruction for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma were retrospectively reviewed. On the basis of two different treatment periods, patients were divided into two groups: A and B. Group A was patients who had received the new reinvented protocol between 2012 and 2016, while group B patients were those having received the previous protocol between 2008 and 2011. Their demographics, post-operative outcome, and hospital charges were collected and compared. RESULTS: There were 64 patients in group A, and 69 in group B. Ventilator days (P<0.001), ICU stay (P<0.001), and post-operative stay (P<0.001) were significantly shorter in group A patients. Complication rates were similar between the two groups. No hospital mortality was noted in either group. Hospital charges in group A were found to be perceptively lower, although not statistically significant (P value =0.078). CONCLUSIONS: The current protocol of perioperative care effectively ameliorated convalescence after esophagectomy and reconstruction for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma without increasing complication rate or mortality. It is also potentially more practical in future health care policies during this era of financial shortage.
Authors: Michael Lanuti; Pierre E de Delva; Abdulrahman Maher; Cameron D Wright; Henning A Gaissert; John C Wain; Dean M Donahue; Douglas J Mathisen Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: J M Findlay; E Tustian; J Millo; A Klucniks; B Sgromo; R E K Marshall; R S Gillies; M R Middleton; N D Maynard Journal: Dis Esophagus Date: 2014-05-18 Impact factor: 3.429
Authors: Jitesh B Shewale; Arlene M Correa; Carla M Baker; Nicole Villafane-Ferriol; Wayne L Hofstetter; Victoria S Jordan; Henrik Kehlet; Katie M Lewis; Reza J Mehran; Barbara L Summers; Diane Schaub; Sonia A Wilks; Stephen G Swisher Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 12.969