Literature DB >> 17949286

Information needs of mothers regarding communicating BRCA1/2 cancer genetic test results to their children.

Kenneth P Tercyak1, Beth N Peshkin, Tiffani A Demarco, Andrea Farkas Patenaude, Katherine A Schneider, Judy E Garber, Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir, Marc D Schwartz.   

Abstract

Mothers who participate in genetic testing for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer risk must decide if, when, and how to ultimately share their BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) test results with their minor-age children. One of the primary aides for mothers in making this decision is cancer genetic counseling. However, counseling is limited in how well it can educate mothers about such decisions without the availability of resources that are specific to family communication and genetic testing per se. In an effort to fill this gap and identify mothers most likely to benefit from such resources, surveys were conducted with 187 mothers undergoing BRCA1/2 testing who had children 8-21 years old. Data were collected weeks after genetic testing but prior to mothers' learning of their test results; quantitative assessments of informational resource needs (i.e., speaking with previous BRCA1/2 testing participants who are parents regarding their experiences, reading educational literature about options and what to expect, speaking with a family counselor, attending a family support group, and self-nominated other resources), testing motivations, decision making vigilance, and decisional conflict regarding communicating test results to children were included. Mothers' most-to-least frequently cited information resource needs were: literature (93.4%), family counseling (85.8%), prior participants (79.0%), support groups (53.9%), and other (28.9%; e.g., pediatricians and psychologists). Seventy-eight percent of mothers were interested in accessing three or more resources. In multivariate regression analyses, testing motivations (beta = 0.35, p = 0.03), decision-making vigilance (beta = 0.16, p = 0.00), and decisional conflict (beta = 0.10, p = 0.00) were associated with mothers' need level; mothers with a greater interest in testing to learn about their children's risks, those with more vigilant decision-making styles, and those with higher decisional conflict had the greatest need. In conjunction with enhanced genetic counseling focusing on family disclosure, educational literature, and psychosocial support may promote improved outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17949286      PMCID: PMC2495765          DOI: 10.1089/gte.2006.0534

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Test        ISSN: 1090-6576


  34 in total

1.  The effects of biasing information on behavioral observations and rating scales.

Authors:  L J Siegel; S L Dragovich; D Marholin
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  1976

2.  A descriptive study of BRCA1 testing and reactions to disclosure of test results.

Authors:  H T Lynch; S J Lemon; C Durham; S T Tinley; C Connolly; J F Lynch; J Surdam; E Orinion; S Slominski-Caster; P Watson; C Lerman; P Tonin; G Lenoir; O Serova; S Narod
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1997-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Developing criteria for establishing interrater reliability of specific items: applications to assessment of adaptive behavior.

Authors:  D V Cicchetti; S A Sparrow
Journal:  Am J Ment Defic       Date:  1981-09

Review 4.  Towards a dietary prevention of hereditary breast cancer.

Authors:  Joanne Kotsopoulos; Steven A Narod
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 5.  Genetic cancer risk assessment and counseling: recommendations of the national society of genetic counselors.

Authors:  Angela Trepanier; Mary Ahrens; Wendy McKinnon; June Peters; Jill Stopfer; Sherry Campbell Grumet; Susan Manley; Julie O Culver; Ronald Acton; Joy Larsen-Haidle; Lori Ann Correia; Robin Bennett; Barbara Pettersen; Terri Diamond Ferlita; Josephine Wagner Costalas; Katherine Hunt; Susan Donlon; Cecile Skrzynia; Carolyn Farrell; Faith Callif-Daley; Catherine Walsh Vockley
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  BRCA1 testing in families with hereditary breast-ovarian cancer. A prospective study of patient decision making and outcomes.

Authors:  C Lerman; S Narod; K Schulman; C Hughes; A Gomez-Caminero; G Bonney; K Gold; B Trock; D Main; J Lynch; C Fulmore; C Snyder; S J Lemon; T Conway; P Tonin; G Lenoir; H Lynch
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-06-26       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Parental interrater reliability as a function of situational specificity and familiarity of target child.

Authors:  K R Burrows; C K Kelley
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  1983-03

8.  Effect of a computer-based decision aid on knowledge, perceptions, and intentions about genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Michael J Green; Susan K Peterson; Maria Wagner Baker; Gregory R Harper; Lois C Friedman; Wendy S Rubinstein; David T Mauger
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-07-28       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Evaluation of a patient education leaflet designed to improve communication in medical consultations.

Authors:  L G Frederikson; P E Bull
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  1995-02

10.  Points to consider: ethical, legal, and psychosocial implications of genetic testing in children and adolescents. American Society of Human Genetics Board of Directors, American College of Medical Genetics Board of Directors.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 11.025

View more
  24 in total

Review 1.  Specific psychosocial issues of individuals undergoing genetic counseling for cancer - a literature review.

Authors:  Willem Eijzenga; Daniela E E Hahn; Neil K Aaronson; Irma Kluijt; Eveline M A Bleiker
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Introduction to the special issue: psychological aspects of genomics and child health.

Authors:  Kenneth P Tercyak
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2008-12-06

3.  Unpacking the blockers: understanding perceptions and social constraints of health communication in hereditary breast ovarian cancer (HBOC) susceptibility families.

Authors:  June A Peters; Regina Kenen; Lindsey M Hoskins; Laura M Koehly; Barry Graubard; Jennifer T Loud; Mark H Greene
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 4.  Ethical issues of predictive genetic testing for diabetes.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-07-01

5.  Anticipating the arrival of low-penetrance genetic testing to primary care medicine.

Authors:  Beth A Tarini; Nicole Exe; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2013-02-12

6.  Talking to children about maternal BRCA1/2 genetic test results: a qualitative study of parental perceptions and advice.

Authors:  Andrea Farkas Patenaude; Tiffani A DeMarco; Beth N Peshkin; Heiddis Valdimarsdottir; Judy E Garber; Katherine A Schneider; Larissa Hewitt; Jennifer Hamilton; Kenneth P Tercyak
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Issues Arising in Psychological Consultations to Help Parents Talk to Minor and Young Adult Children about their Cancer Genetic Test Result: a Guide to Providers.

Authors:  Andrea Farkas Patenaude; Katherine A Schneider
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  On the development of a decision support intervention for mothers undergoing BRCA1/2 cancer genetic testing regarding communicating test results to their children.

Authors:  Beth N Peshkin; Tiffani A Demarco; Kenneth P Tercyak
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 2.375

9.  Women's concerns about the emotional impact of awareness of heritable breast cancer risk and its implications for their children.

Authors:  Suzanne C O'Neill; Darren Mays; Andrea Farkas Patenaude; Judy E Garber; Tiffani A DeMarco; Beth N Peshkin; Katherine A Schneider; Kenneth P Tercyak
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2014-08-07

10.  Role of parenting relationship quality in communicating about maternal BRCA1/2 genetic test results with children.

Authors:  Tiffani A DeMarco; Beth N Peshkin; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir; Andrea F Patenaude; Katherine A Schneider; Kenneth P Tercyak
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.