CONTEXT: The initial diagnosis of pheochromocytoma relies on plasma fractionated metanephrines levels. Normal levels exclude pheochromocytoma, but positive tests have a low positive predictive value due to the disease's rarity. OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to evaluate three approaches to distinguish between true-positive and false-positive tests: 1) increased cutoff for plasma fractionated metanephrines, 2) measurement of serum/plasma chromogranin A (CGA), and 3) urine fractionated metanephrine testing. DESIGN: We studied retrospectively all Mayo Clinic patients with positive plasma fractionated metanephrine tests over a 15-month period and determined their final diagnosis based on histology, imaging, additional biochemical tests, and more than 1 yr follow-up. For a subgroup, urine fractionated metanephrine results were available. All original plasma samples were retested for CGA. RESULTS: Of 140 patients, 40 had a chromaffin tumor confirmed and 100 excluded, indicating a positive predictive value of plasma fractionated metanephrines of 28.6%. Increasing the threshold for a positive test improved specificity to 98% but missed eight cases (20%). Incorporation of urine fractionated metanephrine testing as follow-up test achieved 80% specificity and 91% sensitivity. The corresponding figures for CGA were 71 and 87% for all patients and 89 and 87% when patients taking proton pump inhibitors were excluded. CONCLUSIONS: Unless plasma fractionated metanephrines levels are elevated more than 4-fold above the upper limit of normal, patients with a positive plasma fractionated metanephrines test should be evaluated with urine fractionated metanephrines and serum/plasma CGA assays before being subjected to imaging or invasive diagnostic tests.
CONTEXT: The initial diagnosis of pheochromocytoma relies on plasma fractionated metanephrines levels. Normal levels exclude pheochromocytoma, but positive tests have a low positive predictive value due to the disease's rarity. OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to evaluate three approaches to distinguish between true-positive and false-positive tests: 1) increased cutoff for plasma fractionated metanephrines, 2) measurement of serum/plasma chromogranin A (CGA), and 3) urine fractionated metanephrine testing. DESIGN: We studied retrospectively all Mayo Clinic patients with positive plasma fractionated metanephrine tests over a 15-month period and determined their final diagnosis based on histology, imaging, additional biochemical tests, and more than 1 yr follow-up. For a subgroup, urine fractionated metanephrine results were available. All original plasma samples were retested for CGA. RESULTS: Of 140 patients, 40 had a chromaffintumor confirmed and 100 excluded, indicating a positive predictive value of plasma fractionated metanephrines of 28.6%. Increasing the threshold for a positive test improved specificity to 98% but missed eight cases (20%). Incorporation of urine fractionated metanephrine testing as follow-up test achieved 80% specificity and 91% sensitivity. The corresponding figures for CGA were 71 and 87% for all patients and 89 and 87% when patients taking proton pump inhibitors were excluded. CONCLUSIONS: Unless plasma fractionated metanephrines levels are elevated more than 4-fold above the upper limit of normal, patients with a positive plasma fractionated metanephrines test should be evaluated with urine fractionated metanephrines and serum/plasma CGA assays before being subjected to imaging or invasive diagnostic tests.
Authors: Jacques W M Lenders; Jacques J Willemsen; Graeme Eisenhofer; H Alec Ross; Karel Pacak; Henri J L M Timmers; C G J Fred Sweep Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2007-01-02 Impact factor: 8.327
Authors: Jacques W M Lenders; Karel Pacak; McClellan M Walther; W Marston Linehan; Massimo Mannelli; Peter Friberg; Harry R Keiser; David S Goldstein; Graeme Eisenhofer Journal: JAMA Date: 2002-03-20 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Karel Pacak; Graeme Eisenhofer; Håkan Ahlman; Stefan R Bornstein; Anne-Paule Gimenez-Roqueplo; Ashley B Grossman; Noriko Kimura; Massimo Mannelli; Anne Marie McNicol; Arthur S Tischler Journal: Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab Date: 2007-02
Authors: Jacques W M Lenders; Karel Pacak; Thanh-Truc Huynh; Yehonatan Sharabi; Massimo Mannelli; Gennady Bratslavsky; David S Goldstein; Stefan R Bornstein; Graeme Eisenhofer Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2009-11-06 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Marina S Zemskova; Eric S Nylen; Nicholas J Patronas; Edward H Oldfield; Kenneth L Becker; Lynnette K Nieman Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2009-05-26 Impact factor: 5.958