Literature DB >> 11903030

Biochemical diagnosis of pheochromocytoma: which test is best?

Jacques W M Lenders1, Karel Pacak, McClellan M Walther, W Marston Linehan, Massimo Mannelli, Peter Friberg, Harry R Keiser, David S Goldstein, Graeme Eisenhofer.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Diagnosis of pheochromocytoma depends on biochemical evidence of catecholamine production by the tumor. However, the best test to establish the diagnosis has not been determined.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the biochemical test or combination of tests that provides the best method for diagnosis of pheochromocytoma. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Multicenter cohort study of patients tested for pheochromocytoma at 4 referral centers between 1994 and 2001. The analysis included 214 patients in whom the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma was confirmed and 644 patients who were determined to not have the tumor. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Test sensitivity and specificity, receiver operating characteristic curves, and positive and negative predictive values at different pretest prevalences using plasma free metanephrines, plasma catecholamines, urinary catecholamines, urinary total and fractionated metanephrines, and urinary vanillylmandelic acid.
RESULTS: Sensitivities of plasma free metanephrines (99% [95% confidence interval [CI], 96%-100%]) and urinary fractionated metanephrines (97% [95% CI, 92%-99%]) were higher than those for plasma catecholamines (84% [95% CI, 78%-89%]), urinary catecholamines (86% [95% CI, 80%-91%]), urinary total metanephrines (77% [95% CI, 68%-85%]), and urinary vanillylmandelic acid (64% [95% CI, 55%-71%]). Specificity was highest for urinary vanillylmandelic acid (95% [95% CI, 93%-97%]) and urinary total metanephrines (93% [95% CI, 89%-97%]); intermediate for plasma free metanephrines (89% [95% CI, 87%-92%]), urinary catecholamines (88% [95% CI, 85%-91%]), and plasma catecholamines (81% [95% CI, 78%-84%]); and lowest for urinary fractionated metanephrines (69% [95% CI, 64%-72%]). Sensitivity and specificity values at different upper reference limits were highest for plasma free metanephrines using receiver operating characteristic curves. Combining different tests did not improve the diagnostic yield beyond that of a single test of plasma free metanephrines.
CONCLUSION: Plasma free metanephrines provide the best test for excluding or confirming pheochromocytoma and should be the test of first choice for diagnosis of the tumor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11903030     DOI: 10.1001/jama.287.11.1427

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  223 in total

Review 1.  New roles of carboxypeptidase E in endocrine and neural function and cancer.

Authors:  Niamh X Cawley; William C Wetsel; Saravana R K Murthy; Joshua J Park; Karel Pacak; Y Peng Loh
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 19.871

Review 2.  Pheochromocytoma as an endocrine emergency.

Authors:  Frederieke M Brouwers; Jacques W M Lenders; Graeme Eisenhofer; Karel Pacak
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 6.514

3.  Pitfalls in the diagnosis of phaeochromocytoma.

Authors:  L Zendron; J Fehrenbach; C Taverna; M Krause
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-03-13

4.  Tachyarrythmias with elevated cardiac enzymes in Münchausen syndrome.

Authors:  Lucy Norcliffe-Kaufmann; Alejandra Gonzalez-Duarte; Jose Martinez; Horacio Kaufmann
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 4.435

Review 5.  Neurocardiology: therapeutic implications for cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  David S Goldstein
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ther       Date:  2010-11-25       Impact factor: 3.023

6.  Clinical benefits of systemic chemotherapy for patients with metastatic pheochromocytomas or sympathetic extra-adrenal paragangliomas: insights from the largest single-institutional experience.

Authors:  Montserrat Ayala-Ramirez; Lei Feng; Mouhammed A Habra; Thereasa Rich; Paxton V Dickson; Nancy Perrier; Alexandria Phan; Steven Waguespack; Shreyaskumar Patel; Camilo Jimenez
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 7.  Treatment of resistant hypertension.

Authors:  Sandra J Taler
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 8.  Accuracy of recommended sampling and assay methods for the determination of plasma-free and urinary fractionated metanephrines in the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma: a systematic review.

Authors:  Roland Därr; Matthias Kuhn; Christoph Bode; Stefan R Bornstein; Karel Pacak; Jacques W M Lenders; Graeme Eisenhofer
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 3.633

9.  The many faces of pheochromocytoma.

Authors:  H K Ghayee; K L Wyne; F S Yau; W H Snyder; S Holt; S Tunc Gokaslan; F Nwariaku
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 10.  Update on pediatric pheochromocytoma.

Authors:  Bas Havekes; Johannes A Romijn; Graeme Eisenhofer; Karen Adams; Karel Pacak
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 3.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.