Literature DB >> 17043632

Chromogranin A immunoradiometric assay in diagnosis of pheochromocytoma: comparison with plasma metanephrines and 123I-MIBG scan.

L Giovanella1, N Squin, A Ghelfo, L Ceriani.   

Abstract

AIM: The aim of this study is to investigate the diagnostic performance of serum chromogranin A (CgA) and plasma metanephrines (MN) assays in the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma.
METHODS: We enrolled 44 patients affected by histologically proved adrenal pheochromocytoma. All patients underwent abdominal computed tomography and whole body 123I-MIBG scan to stage the disease. One hundred healthy blood donors and 148 patients affected by essential hypertension were enrolled as controls. Serum CgA and plasma MN were assayed by immunoradiometric assay (IRMA) and high-performance liquid chromatography. Cut-off levels were selected to obtain 99% specificity in healthy control subjects.
RESULTS: Both MN and CgA showed 95% sensitivity with comparable high specificity and diagnostic accuracy (96% and 96% for CgA, 94% and 95% for MN, respectively). By employing both markers and considering CgA or MN positivity, a 100% sensitivity was obtained with 95% accuracy. MN and CgA concentration clearly increased from controls to patients with pheochromocytomas (P<0.0001). A relationship between serum CgA (but not MN) and tumor mass was found (P<0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Both markers are sensitive and specific in chromaffin-tumors detection: CgA IRMA assay employed a simple and feasible technology and showed to be as sensitive and slightly more accurate than MN.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17043632

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1824-4785            Impact factor:   2.346


  8 in total

Review 1.  Accuracy of recommended sampling and assay methods for the determination of plasma-free and urinary fractionated metanephrines in the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma: a systematic review.

Authors:  Roland Därr; Matthias Kuhn; Christoph Bode; Stefan R Bornstein; Karel Pacak; Jacques W M Lenders; Graeme Eisenhofer
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 2.  The importance of standardisation of measurement and reference intervals for detection of phaeochromocytoma and paraganglioma (PPGL).

Authors:  Tomás P Griffin; Delia Bogdanet; Patrick Navin; Grace Callagy; Paula M O'Shea; Marcia Bell
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 3.  PRECISION MEDICINE: AN UPDATE ON GENOTYPE/BIOCHEMICAL PHENOTYPE RELATIONSHIPS IN PHEOCHROMOCYTOMA/PARAGANGLIOMA PATIENTS.

Authors:  Garima Gupta; Karel Pacak
Journal:  Endocr Pract       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 3.443

4.  Malignant pheochromocytoma: predictive factors of malignancy and clinical course in 16 patients at a single tertiary medical center.

Authors:  Auryan Szalat; Merav Fraenkel; Victoria Doviner; Asher Salmon; David J Gross
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 3.633

5.  Advances in biochemical screening for phaeochromocytoma using biogenic amines.

Authors:  Malcolm J Whiting; Matthew P Doogue
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2009-02

6.  Plasma chromogranin A or urine fractionated metanephrines follow-up testing improves the diagnostic accuracy of plasma fractionated metanephrines for pheochromocytoma.

Authors:  Alicia Algeciras-Schimnich; Carol M Preissner; William F Young; Ravinder J Singh; Stefan K G Grebe
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2007-10-16       Impact factor: 5.958

7.  PREDICTIVE VALUE OF CHROMOGRANIN A IN A DIAGNOSIS TOWARDS PHEOCHROMOCYTOMA IN ADRENAL INCIDENTALOMA.

Authors:  S K Zawadzka-Leska; M Radziszewski; K Malec; A Stadnik; U Ambroziak
Journal:  Acta Endocrinol (Buchar)       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 0.877

8.  Chromogranin A - unspecific neuroendocrine marker. Clinical utility and potential diagnostic pitfalls.

Authors:  Paweł Gut; Agata Czarnywojtek; Jakub Fischbach; Maciej Bączyk; Katarzyna Ziemnicka; Elżbieta Wrotkowska; Maria Gryczyńska; Marek Ruchała
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 3.318

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.