Literature DB >> 17931510

Criterion-based training with surgical simulators: proficiency of experienced surgeons.

Wm LeRoy Heinrichs1, Brian Lukoff, Patricia Youngblood, Parvati Dev, Richard Shavelson, Harrith M Hasson, Richard M Satava, Elspeth M McDougall, Paul Alan Wetter.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In our effort to establish criterion-based skills training for surgeons, we assessed the performance of 17 experienced laparoscopic surgeons on basic technical surgical skills recorded electronically in 26 modules selected in 5 commercially available, computer-based simulators.
METHODS: Performance data were derived from selected surgeons randomly assigned to simulator stations, and practicing repetitively during one and one-half day sessions on 5 different simulators. We measured surgeon proficiency defined as efficient, error-free performance and developed proficiency score formulas for each module. Demographic and opinion data were also collected.
RESULTS: Surgeons' performance demonstrated a sharp learning curve with the most performance improvement seen in early practice attempts. Median scores and performance levels at the 10th, 25th, 75th, and 90th percentiles are provided for each module. Construct validity was examined for 2 modules by comparing experienced surgeons' performance with that of a convenience sample of less-experienced surgeons.
CONCLUSION: A simple mathematical method for scoring performance is applicable to these simulators. Proficiency levels for training courses can now be specified objectively by residency directors and by professional organizations for different levels of training or post-training assessment of technical performance. But data users should be cautious due to the small sample size in this study and the need for further study into the reliability and validity of the use of surgical simulators as assessment tools.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17931510      PMCID: PMC3015829     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JSLS        ISSN: 1086-8089            Impact factor:   2.172


  13 in total

Review 1.  Metrics for objective Assessment.

Authors:  R M Satava; A Cuschieri; J Hamdorf
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-11-20       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Invited commentary: Educational interventions to address the core competencies in surgery.

Authors:  Ajit K Sachdeva
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.982

3.  The performance of master surgeons on the Advanced Dundee Endoscopic Psychomotor Tester: contrast validity study.

Authors:  Nader K Francis; George B Hanna; Alfred Cuschieri
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2002-07

4.  Surgical competence and surgical proficiency: definitions, taxonomy, and metrics.

Authors:  Richard M Satava; Anthony G Gallagher; Carlos A Pellegrini
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  Assessment of surgical competence in parotid surgery using a CUSUM assessment tool.

Authors:  J F Sharp; N Cozens; I Robinson
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci       Date:  2003-06

Review 6.  Acquisition and maintenance of surgical competence.

Authors:  Ajit K Sachdeva
Journal:  Semin Vasc Surg       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 1.000

7.  Proving the value of simulation in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Gerald M Fried; Liane S Feldman; Melina C Vassiliou; Shannon A Fraser; Donna Stanbridge; Gabriela Ghitulescu; Christopher G Andrew
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents.

Authors:  J A Martin; G Regehr; R Reznick; H MacRae; J Murnaghan; C Hutchison; M Brown
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Testing technical skill via an innovative "bench station" examination.

Authors:  R Reznick; G Regehr; H MacRae; J Martin; W McCulloch
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Competency and the six core competencies.

Authors:  Michael S Kavic
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2002 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

View more
  9 in total

1.  Construct and face validity of SINERGIA laparoscopic virtual reality simulator.

Authors:  Luisa F Sánchez-Peralta; Francisco M Sánchez-Margallo; José Luis Moyano-Cuevas; José Blas Pagador; Silvia Enciso-Sanz; Patricia Sánchez-González; Enrique J Gómez-Aguilera; Jesús Usón-Gargallo
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Access to a simulator is not enough: the benefits of virtual reality training based on peer-group-derived benchmarks--a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Martin W von Websky; Dimitri A Raptis; Martina Vitz; Rachel Rosenthal; P A Clavien; Dieter Hahnloser
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Establishing construct validity of a virtual-reality training simulator for hysteroscopy via a multimetric scoring system.

Authors:  Michael Bajka; Stefan Tuchschmid; Daniel Fink; Gábor Székely; Matthias Harders
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Does 3-Dimensional (3-D) visualization improve the quality of assistance during robotic radical prostatectomy?

Authors:  Rajan Ramanathan; Juan I Martinez Salamanca; Anil Mandhani; Robert A Leung; Sandhya R Rao; Roy Berryhill; Ashutosh Tewari
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Evaluation of surgical training in the era of simulation.

Authors:  Shazrinizam Shaharan; Paul Neary
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-09-16

6.  Playing to your skills: a randomised controlled trial evaluating a dedicated video game for minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Cuan M Harrington; Vishwa Chaitanya; Patrick Dicker; Oscar Traynor; Dara O Kavanagh
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Criterion-based laparoscopic training reduces total training time.

Authors:  Willem M Brinkman; Sonja N Buzink; Leonidas Alevizos; Ignace H J T de Hingh; Jack J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Clinical use of a cordless laparoscopic ultrasonic device.

Authors:  Fernando J Kim; David Sehrt; Wilson R Molina; Alexandre Pompeo
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2014 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

9.  Simulation training in laparoscopy using a computerized physical reality simulator.

Authors:  Harrith M Hasson
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2008 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.