Literature DB >> 17929700

Stopping eye and hand movements: are the processes independent?

Leanne Boucher1, Veit Stuphorn, Gordon D Logan, Jeffrey D Schall, Thomas J Palmeri.   

Abstract

To explore how eye and hand movements are controlled in a stop task, we introduced effector uncertainty by instructing subjects to initiate and occasionally inhibit eye, hand, or eye + hand movements in response to a color-coded foveal or tone-coded auditory stop signal. Regardless of stop signal modality, stop signal reaction time was shorter for eye movements than for hand movements, but notably did not vary with knowledge about which movement to cancel. Most errors on eye + hand stopping trials were combined eye + hand movements. The probability and latency of signal respond eye and hand movements corresponded to predictions of Logan and Cowan's (1984) race model applied to each effector independently.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17929700     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193779

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  39 in total

1.  Functional parcellation of the inferior frontal and midcingulate cortices in a flanker-stop-change paradigm.

Authors:  Stefanie Enriquez-Geppert; Tom Eichele; Karsten Specht; Harald Kugel; Christo Pantev; René J Huster
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Performance monitoring local field potentials in the medial frontal cortex of primates: supplementary eye field.

Authors:  Erik E Emeric; Melanie Leslie; Pierre Pouget; Jeffrey D Schall
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Vocal response inhibition is enhanced by anodal tDCS over the right prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Leidy J Castro-Meneses; Blake W Johnson; Paul F Sowman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Event-related fields evoked by vocal response inhibition: a comparison of younger and older adults.

Authors:  Leidy J Castro-Meneses; Blake W Johnson; Paul F Sowman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  A common control signal and a ballistic stage can explain the control of coordinated eye-hand movements.

Authors:  Atul Gopal; Aditya Murthy
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  Response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm.

Authors:  Frederick Verbruggen; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  The presence of visual gap affects the duration of stopping process.

Authors:  Giovanni Mirabella; Pierpaolo Pani; Stefano Ferraina
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Measurement of the extraocular spike potential during saccade countermanding.

Authors:  David C Godlove; Anna K Garr; Geoffrey F Woodman; Jeffrey D Schall
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Eye-hand coordination during a double-step task: evidence for a common stochastic accumulator.

Authors:  Atul Gopal; Aditya Murthy
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 10.  Models of response inhibition in the stop-signal and stop-change paradigms.

Authors:  Frederick Verbruggen; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 8.989

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.