Literature DB >> 17929009

Ligand-escape pathways from the ligand-binding domain of PPARgamma receptor as probed by molecular dynamics simulations.

D Genest1, N Garnier, A Arrault, C Marot, L Morin-Allory, M Genest.   

Abstract

Conformational rearrangements of peroxysome proliferator activated receptor (PPARgamma) ligand-binding domain (LBD) that accompany the release and binding of ligands are not well understood. To determine the major events associated with the escape of the partial agonist GW0072, molecular dynamic (MD) simulations were performed using two different methods: reversed targeted molecular dynamics (TMD(-1)) and time-dependent distance restraints (TDR) using as restraints either the root mean square deviation from a reference structure (TMD(-1)) or the distance between the geometrical centers of the binding pocket and of the ligand (TDR). Both methods do not assume any a priori route for ligand extraction. To avoid artifacts, different initial simulation conditions were used and particular attention was paid for giving time to the protein to relax during the extraction process by running 10-12 ns simulations within explicit water. Two distinct exit gates A and B were found, independently of initial conditions and method. During the exit process no interaction between GW0072 and the transactivation AF-2 helix was observed. Our results suggest that the ligand uses the intrinsic flexibility of the protein to move within the receptor. Paths A and B are very similar to those found for other nuclear receptors, suggesting that these routes are a common characteristics of nuclear receptors that are used by different kinds of ligands. Finally, the knowledge of entry/exit pathways of a receptor should be very useful in discriminating between different ligands that could have been favorably docked in the binding pocket by introducing docking along these pathways into computational drug design protocols.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17929009     DOI: 10.1007/s00249-007-0220-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Biophys J        ISSN: 0175-7571            Impact factor:   1.733


  30 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Retinoic acid receptor: a simulation analysis of retinoic acid binding and the resulting conformational changes.

Authors:  A Blondel; J P Renaud; S Fischer; D Moras; M Karplus
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-08-06       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 3.  The PPARs: from orphan receptors to drug discovery.

Authors:  T M Willson; P J Brown; D D Sternbach; B R Henke
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2000-02-24       Impact factor: 7.446

4.  Steered molecular dynamics investigations of protein function.

Authors:  B Isralewitz; J Baudry; J Gullingsrud; D Kosztin; K Schulten
Journal:  J Mol Graph Model       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.518

5.  Activation of a member of the steroid hormone receptor superfamily by peroxisome proliferators.

Authors:  I Issemann; S Green
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1990-10-18       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Conformational pathway for the kissing complex-->extended dimer transition of the SL1 stem-loop from genomic HIV-1 RNA as monitored by targeted molecular dynamics techniques.

Authors:  S Aci; S Mazier; D Genest
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2005-08-19       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Indol-1-yl acetic acids as peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonists: design, synthesis, structural biology, and molecular docking studies.

Authors:  Neeraj Mahindroo; Chiung-Chiu Wang; Chun-Chen Liao; Chien-Fu Huang; I-Lin Lu; Tzu-Wen Lien; Yi-Huei Peng; Wei-Jan Huang; Ying-Ting Lin; Ming-Chen Hsu; Chia-Hui Lin; Chia-Hua Tsai; John T-A Hsu; Xin Chen; Ping-Chiang Lyu; Yu-Sheng Chao; Su-Ying Wu; Hsing-Pang Hsieh
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2006-02-09       Impact factor: 7.446

8.  Anatomy of protein pockets and cavities: measurement of binding site geometry and implications for ligand design.

Authors:  J Liang; H Edelsbrunner; C Woodward
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  MOLMOL: a program for display and analysis of macromolecular structures.

Authors:  R Koradi; M Billeter; K Wüthrich
Journal:  J Mol Graph       Date:  1996-02

10.  Targeted molecular dynamics: a new approach for searching pathways of conformational transitions.

Authors:  J Schlitter; M Engels; P Krüger
Journal:  J Mol Graph       Date:  1994-06
View more
  13 in total

1.  Structural modeling of high-affinity thyroid receptor-ligand complexes.

Authors:  Alexandre Suman de Araujo; Leandro Martínez; Ricardo de Paula Nicoluci; Munir S Skaf; Igor Polikarpov
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2010-05-30       Impact factor: 1.733

2.  Extracting ligands from receptors by reversed targeted molecular dynamics.

Authors:  Romain M Wolf
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Identification of a new hormone-binding site on the surface of thyroid hormone receptor.

Authors:  P C T Souza; A C Puhl; L Martínez; R Aparício; A S Nascimento; A C M Figueira; P Nguyen; P Webb; M S Skaf; I Polikarpov
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2014-02-19

4.  Solution Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Studies of the Ligand-Binding Domain of an Orphan Nuclear Receptor Reveal a Dynamic Helix in the Ligand-Binding Pocket.

Authors:  Nicolas Daffern; Zhonglei Chen; Yongbo Zhang; Leslie Pick; Ishwar Radhakrishnan
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 3.162

5.  Forced unbinding of GPR17 ligands from wild type and R255I mutant receptor models through a computational approach.

Authors:  Chiara Parravicini; Maria P Abbracchio; Piercarlo Fantucci; Graziella Ranghino
Journal:  BMC Struct Biol       Date:  2010-03-16

6.  Ligand unbinding pathways from the vitamin D receptor studied by molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Mikael Peräkylä
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2008-10-03       Impact factor: 1.733

7.  Two steps, one ligand: How PPARγ binds small-molecule agonists.

Authors:  James J Siclari; Kevin H Gardner
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2021-09-02       Impact factor: 5.006

8.  Structural mechanism underlying ligand binding and activation of PPARγ.

Authors:  Jinsai Shang; Douglas J Kojetin
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 5.871

9.  Steered molecular dynamics simulations reveal the likelier dissociation pathway of imatinib from its targeting kinases c-Kit and Abl.

Authors:  Li-Jun Yang; Jun Zou; Huan-Zhang Xie; Lin-Li Li; Yu-Quan Wei; Sheng-Yong Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  An alternate binding site for PPARγ ligands.

Authors:  Travis S Hughes; Pankaj Kumar Giri; Ian Mitchelle S de Vera; David P Marciano; Dana S Kuruvilla; Youseung Shin; Anne-Laure Blayo; Theodore M Kamenecka; Thomas P Burris; Patrick R Griffin; Douglas J Kojetin
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.