Literature DB >> 17926072

Predictive validity of initial fear avoidance beliefs in patients with low back pain receiving physical therapy: is the FABQ a useful screening tool for identifying patients at risk for a poor recovery?

Joshua A Cleland1, Julie M Fritz, Gerard P Brennan.   

Abstract

Several prospective studies examining patients receiving physical therapy support the predictive validity of FABQ subscale scores. This has lead to the proposition that the FABQ would be a useful screening tool, permitting early identification of patients at risk for a poor outcome with an opportunity to modify the treatment accordingly. However, the predictive validity of the FABQ within physical therapy practice has yet to be examined. Predictive validity was analyzed between the FABQ-PA, FABQ-W using both disability and pain as the dependent variables using Pearson correlation coefficients and stepwise hierarchical linear regression modeling controlling for baseline variables. Separate analyses were run for patients with private health insurance and those receiving workers' compensation. Further analysis of predictive validity was performed by dichotomizing the outcome of physical therapy. Patients were coded as having a poor outcome if they failed to achieve a minimum clinically important change in disability over the course of treatment. The accuracy of previously reported cut-off scales for both the FABQ-W and FABQ-PA were examined for both payor types. Results of the hierarchical linear regression analyses for patients with private insurance showed neither the FABQ-PA nor the FABQ-W score significantly improved the explained variance in change in pain or disability. For patients receiving workers' compensation, only the FABQ-W subscale score significantly contributed to the model after controlling for the other baseline variables for both changes in disability and pain. Only the FABQ-W subscale was predictive of poor outcome and this was only identified in the worker's compensation group. The results suggest that the work subscale of the FABQ might be an appropriate screening tool to identify patients with work-related LBP who are at risk for a poor outcome with routine physical therapy. Neither FABQ subscale was predictive of outcome for patients with private insurance, and the use of the FABQ, as a screening tool for patients with non-work-related LBP was not supported.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17926072      PMCID: PMC2365529          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-007-0511-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  45 in total

1.  External validity of randomised controlled trials: "to whom do the results of this trial apply?".

Authors:  Peter M Rothwell
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Jan 1-7       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Screening to identify patients at risk: profiles of psychological risk factors for early intervention.

Authors:  Katja Boersma; Steven J Linton
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.442

3.  Can we screen for problematic back pain? A screening questionnaire for predicting outcome in acute and subacute back pain.

Authors:  S J Linton; K Halldén
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.442

4.  A descriptive study of the centralization phenomenon. A prospective analysis.

Authors:  M Werneke; D L Hart; D Cook
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Pain-related fear is more disabling than pain itself: evidence on the role of pain-related fear in chronic back pain disability.

Authors:  G Crombez; J W Vlaeyen; P H Heuts; R Lysens
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 6.961

6.  Discographic, MRI and psychosocial determinants of low back pain disability and remission: a prospective study in subjects with benign persistent back pain.

Authors:  Eugene J Carragee; Todd F Alamin; Jonothan L Miller; John M Carragee
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.166

7.  A longitudinal study on the predictive validity of the fear-avoidance model in low back pain.

Authors:  Judith M Sieben; Johan W S Vlaeyen; Piet J M Portegijs; Jeanine A Verbunt; Sita van Riet-Rutgers; Arnold D M Kester; Michael Von Korff; Arnoud Arntz; J André Knottnerus
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 6.961

8.  A treatment-based classification approach to low back syndrome: identifying and staging patients for conservative treatment.

Authors:  A Delitto; R E Erhard; R W Bowling
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1995-06

9.  A Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) and the role of fear-avoidance beliefs in chronic low back pain and disability.

Authors:  Gordon Waddell; Mary Newton; Iain Henderson; Douglas Somerville; Chris J Main
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 6.961

10.  The relationship of anticipated pain and fear avoidance beliefs to outcome in patients with chronic low back pain who are not receiving workers' compensation.

Authors:  Saud M Al-Obaidi; Paul Beattie; Baker Al-Zoabi; Sami Al-Wekeel
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  Epidemiology of spine care: the back pain dilemma.

Authors:  Janna Friedly; Christopher Standaert; Leighton Chan
Journal:  Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.784

2.  The predictive ability of the STarT Back Screening Tool in a Danish secondary care setting.

Authors:  Lars Morsø; Peter Kent; Claus Manniche; Hanne B Albert
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Validity and reliability of the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) in workers with upper extremity injuries.

Authors:  Taucha Inrig; Bev Amey; Cheryl Borthwick; Dorcas Beaton
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2012-03

4.  The predictive and external validity of the STarT Back Tool in Danish primary care.

Authors:  Lars Morsø; Peter Kent; Hanne B Albert; Jonathan C Hill; Alice Kongsted; Claus Manniche
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-02-10       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Fear-avoidance beliefs, anxiety and depression are associated with motor control and dynamics parameters in patients with chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Yannick Delpierre
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-01-23

6.  Effectiveness of mechanical diagnosis and therapy in patients with back pain who meet a clinical prediction rule for spinal manipulation.

Authors:  Ron Schenk; Carol Dionne; Corey Simon; Robert Johnson
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2012-02

7.  Different minimally important clinical difference (MCID) scores lead to different clinical prediction rules for the Oswestry disability index for the same sample of patients.

Authors:  Julie Schwind; Kenneth Learman; Bryan O'Halloran; Christopher Showalter; Chad Cook
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2013-05

8.  Low back pain in adolescents: a comparison of clinical outcomes in sports participants and nonparticipants.

Authors:  Julie M Fritz; Shannon N Clifford
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.860

9.  Comparison of work-related fear-avoidance beliefs across different anatomical locations with musculoskeletal pain.

Authors:  Corey B Simon; Sandra E Stryker; Steven Z George
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 3.133

10.  Prediction of walking ability following posterior decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Suzanne McIlroy; Feroz Jadhakhan; David Bell; Alison Rushton
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.