Literature DB >> 7770494

A treatment-based classification approach to low back syndrome: identifying and staging patients for conservative treatment.

A Delitto1, R E Erhard, R W Bowling.   

Abstract

We present a treatment-based classification approach to the conservative management of low back syndrome. The approach has three levels of classification based on historical information, behavior of symptoms, and clinical signs. We first distinguish patients whose conservative care can be managed predominantly and independently by physical therapists versus patients who require consultation with other services (eg, psychology) or who require referral because of possible serious nonmusculoskeletal pathology. Once patients who can be managed by physical therapists are identified, the next level of classification is to stage their condition with regard to severity. We propose three stages: stage I for patients in the acute phase where the therapeutic goal is symptom relief, stage II for patients in a subacute phase where symptom relief and quick return to normal function are encouraged, and stage III for selected patients who must return to activities requiring high physical demands and who demonstrate a lack of physical conditioning necessary to perform the desired activities safely. The remainder of the article focuses on a third level of classification for stage I only in which patients are classified into distinct categories that are treatment-based and that specifically guide conservative management. The entire approach is diagnosis based, with specific algorithms and decision rules as well as examples presented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7770494     DOI: 10.1093/ptj/75.6.470

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Ther        ISSN: 0031-9023


  100 in total

1.  Authors' response.

Authors:  Mark W Werneke; Dennis L Hart
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2010-12

2.  Disentangling classification systems from their individual categories and the category-specific criteria: an essential consideration to evaluate clinical utility.

Authors:  Julie Fritz
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2010-12

3.  Individual expectation: an overlooked, but pertinent, factor in the treatment of individuals experiencing musculoskeletal pain.

Authors:  Joel E Bialosky; Mark D Bishop; Joshua A Cleland
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2010-06-30

4.  Lumbar segmental instability: Points to ponder.

Authors:  P Gopinath
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2015-10-08

5.  Inter-examiner reliability in the assessment of low back pain (LBP) using the Kirkaldy-Willis classification (KWC).

Authors:  Bo C Bertilson; Johan Bring; Anneli Sjöblom; Karin Sundell; Lars-Erik Strender
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Subclassification of low back pain: a cross-country comparison.

Authors:  Evdokia V Billis; Christopher J McCarthy; Jacqueline A Oldham
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-03-17       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Clinical prediction rules: time to sacrifice the holy cow of specificity?

Authors:  Peter Huijbregts
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2007

8.  Evidence-based diagnosis and treatment of the painful sacroiliac joint.

Authors:  Peter A Huijbregts
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2008

9.  The role of anger in psychosocial subgrouping for patients with low back pain.

Authors:  Anne N Nisenzon; Steven Z George; Jason M Beneciuk; Laura D Wandner; Calia Torres; Michael E Robinson
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.442

10.  Directional preference constructs for patients' low back pain in the absence of centralization.

Authors:  Richard Yarznbowicz; Minjing Tao
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2018-08-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.