Literature DB >> 15864158

The relationship of anticipated pain and fear avoidance beliefs to outcome in patients with chronic low back pain who are not receiving workers' compensation.

Saud M Al-Obaidi1, Paul Beattie, Baker Al-Zoabi, Sami Al-Wekeel.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A prospective, interventional case series design.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the degree to which preintervention measures of anticipated pain and fear avoidance beliefs predict outcome after intervention for patients with delayed recovery from low back pain (LBP) for which they are not receiving workers' compensation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Anticipated pain and fear avoidance beliefs have been suggested as important factors for the classification and treatment of patients with LBP. However, the degree to which they are associated with outcome after intervention is uncertain.
METHODS: There were 42 subjects with activity limiting LBP for more than 2 months enrolled in an exercise based, physical therapy program. A multidimensional test battery was completed before and after a 10-week program of lumbar extensor muscle strengthening. Correlational analyses, independent t tests, and validity indexes were used to determine relationships of preintervention measures of anticipated pain and the fear avoidance beliefs to clinically meaningful improvements in the Roland-Morris score. Intention-to-treat strategies were used to account for study dropouts.
RESULTS: A total of 36 subjects completed the 10-week intervention. The lack of clinically meaningful outcome, as determined by a failure-to-report a minimum of 16% decrease in the Roland-Morris score, was associated with high preintervention scores on the physical activity subscale of the Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQP). Subjects with a preintervention score > or =29 on the FABQP had a likelihood ratio of 3.78 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.4-5.16) for an increased probability of negative outcome after initial testing when compared to those subjects with low (<20) scores. The sensitivity and specificity of low scores to predict clinically meaningful outcomes compared to those with high scores were moderate (sensitivity = 0.87 and specificity 0.77); however, the likelihood ratio was inconclusive. Anticipated pain was significantly correlated with but was higher than the reported pain during activity both before and after intervention but not predictive of outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: In a sample of people from a Middle Eastern culture undergoing exercise intervention for LBP for which they are not receiving workers' compensation, the preintervention physical activity subscale of the FABQ is predictive of negative outcome when the observed scores are > or =29. Despite significant improvements in all variables after intervention, anticipated pain remained significantly higher than reported pain during physical performance testing but did not predict outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15864158     DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000160848.94706.83

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  20 in total

1.  Lateral abdominal muscle symmetry in collegiate single-sided rowers.

Authors:  Norman W Gill; Beth E Mason; J Parry Gerber
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2012-02

Review 2.  The effectiveness of walking as an intervention for low back pain: a systematic review.

Authors:  P Hendrick; A M Te Wake; A S Tikkisetty; L Wulff; C Yap; S Milosavljevic
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Individuals With Recurrent Low Back Pain Exhibit Significant Changes in Paraspinal Muscle Strength After Intramuscular Fine Wire Electrode Insertion.

Authors:  Szu-Ping Lee; Vincent Dinglasan; Anthony Duong; Russell Totten; Jo A Smith
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2019-12-28       Impact factor: 2.298

4.  Development and Validation of a Pain Behavior Assessment in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Katharina Meyer; Andreas Klipstein; Peter Oesch; Beatrice Jansen; Jan Kool; Karin Niedermann
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2016-03

Review 5.  The fear-avoidance model of musculoskeletal pain: current state of scientific evidence.

Authors:  Maaike Leeuw; Mariëlle E J B Goossens; Steven J Linton; Geert Crombez; Katja Boersma; Johan W S Vlaeyen
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2006-12-20

6.  Development of a self-report measure of fearful activities for patients with low back pain: the fear of daily activities questionnaire.

Authors:  Steven Z George; Carolina Valencia; Giorgio Zeppieri; Michael E Robinson
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2009-07-16

7.  Investigation of elevated fear-avoidance beliefs for patients with low back pain: a secondary analysis involving patients enrolled in physical therapy clinical trials.

Authors:  Steven Z George; Julie M Fritz; John D Childs
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 4.751

8.  Predictive validity of initial fear avoidance beliefs in patients with low back pain receiving physical therapy: is the FABQ a useful screening tool for identifying patients at risk for a poor recovery?

Authors:  Joshua A Cleland; Julie M Fritz; Gerard P Brennan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Outcomes are not different for patient-matched versus nonmatched treatment in subjects with chronic recurrent low back pain: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Sharon M Henry; Linda R Van Dillen; Rebecca H Ouellette-Morton; Juvena R Hitt; Karen V Lomond; Michael J DeSarno; Janice Y Bunn
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2014-03-22       Impact factor: 4.166

10.  Ontario Musculoskeletal Physiotherapists' Attitudes toward and Beliefs about Managing Chronic Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Elizabeth Benny; Cathy Evans
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 1.037

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.