Literature DB >> 17925266

Statistical models for neural encoding, decoding, and optimal stimulus design.

Liam Paninski1, Jonathan Pillow, Jeremy Lewi.   

Abstract

There are two basic problems in the statistical analysis of neural data. The "encoding" problem concerns how information is encoded in neural spike trains: can we predict the spike trains of a neuron (or population of neurons), given an arbitrary stimulus or observed motor response? Conversely, the "decoding" problem concerns how much information is in a spike train, in particular, how well can we estimate the stimulus that gave rise to the spike train? This chapter describes statistical model-based techniques that in some cases provide a unified solution to these two coding problems. These models can capture stimulus dependencies as well as spike history and interneuronal interaction effects in population spike trains, and are intimately related to biophysically based models of integrate-and-fire type. We describe flexible, powerful likelihood-based methods for fitting these encoding models and then for using the models to perform optimal decoding. Each of these (apparently quite difficult) tasks turn out to be highly computationally tractable, due to a key concavity property of the model likelihood. Finally, we return to the encoding problem to describe how to use these models to adaptively optimize the stimuli presented to the cell on a trial-by-trial basis, in order that we may infer the optimal model parameters as efficiently as possible.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17925266     DOI: 10.1016/S0079-6123(06)65031-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Brain Res        ISSN: 0079-6123            Impact factor:   2.453


  89 in total

1.  SCALPEL: EXTRACTING NEURONS FROM CALCIUM IMAGING DATA.

Authors:  Ashley Petersen; Noah Simon; Daniela Witten
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 2.083

2.  Inferring synaptic inputs given a noisy voltage trace via sequential Monte Carlo methods.

Authors:  Liam Paninski; Michael Vidne; Brian DePasquale; Daniel Gil Ferreira
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 1.621

3.  Disentangling the functional consequences of the connectivity between optic-flow processing neurons.

Authors:  Franz Weber; Christian K Machens; Alexander Borst
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-12       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Neuron-specific stimulus masking reveals interference in spike timing at the cortical level.

Authors:  Eric Larson; Ross K Maddox; Ben P Perrone; Kamal Sen; Cyrus P Billimoria
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-10-01

5.  A point process framework for modeling electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve.

Authors:  Joshua H Goldwyn; Jay T Rubinstein; Eric Shea-Brown
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Automating the design of informative sequences of sensory stimuli.

Authors:  Jeremy Lewi; David M Schneider; Sarah M N Woolley; Liam Paninski
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 1.621

7.  Biophysical information representation in temporally correlated spike trains.

Authors:  William H Nesse; Leonard Maler; André Longtin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  A generalized linear model of the impact of direct and indirect inputs to the lateral geniculate nucleus.

Authors:  Baktash Babadi; Alexander Casti; Youping Xiao; Ehud Kaplan; Liam Paninski
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 9.  Computational identification of receptive fields.

Authors:  Tatyana O Sharpee
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 12.449

10.  Low-dimensional sensory feature representation by trigeminal primary afferents.

Authors:  Michael R Bale; Kyle Davies; Oliver J Freeman; Robin A A Ince; Rasmus S Petersen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.