Literature DB >> 17922149

Disc height reduction in adjacent segments and clinical outcome 10 years after lumbar 360 degrees fusion.

Tobias L Schulte1, Freek Leistra, Viola Bullmann, Nani Osada, Volker Vieth, Björn Marquardt, Thomas Lerner, Ulf Liljenqvist, Lars Hackenberg.   

Abstract

Adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) is discussed to impair long-term outcome after lumbar interbody fusion. Nevertheless the amount and origin of degeneration and its clinical relevance remain unclear. Only little data is published studying quantitative disc height reduction (DHR) as indicator for ASD in long-term follow-up. Forty patients (23 men, 17 women) (group 1: degenerative disc disease, n = 27; group 2: lytic spondylolisthesis, n = 13) underwent lumbar 360 degrees instrumentation and fusion between 1991 and 1997. Preoperative and follow-up lateral lumbar radiographs were studied. Disc heights of first and second cephalad adjacent segments were measured by Farfan's technique and Hurxthal's technique modified by Pope. Clinical outcome was studied using Oswestry disability index (ODI) and visual analogue scale (VAS). Age, gender, prior surgery, fusion rate and number of fusion levels were investigated as potential factors affecting the outcome. Mean follow-up was 114 (72-161) months. Clinical outcome showed an improvement of 44.6% in ODI and 43.8% in VAS with a tendency towards better results in group 2. Fusion rate was 95%. Disc height of the first cephalad adjacent segment in all patients was reduced by on average 21% (Farfan, P < 0.001) and 19% (Pope, P < 0.001), respectively, and that of the second adjacent level by on average 16% (Farfan, P < 0.001) and 14% (Pope, P < 0.001), respectively. A tendency towards more disc height reduction (DHR) in the degenerative group was observed. Advanced age correlated with advanced DHR (P < or = 0.003, r = 0.5). Multiple level fusion led to a more pronounced DHR than 1-level fusion (P = 0.028). There was a tendency towards more DHR in the first adjacent disc compared to the second. Gender, prior surgery of the fused segment and fusion level did not affect the amount of DHR. There was no correlation between the clinical outcome and DHR. Lumbar fusion is associated with DHR of adjacent discs. This may be induced by additional biomechanical stress, ongoing degeneration affecting the lumbar spine and advancing age. However, clinical outcome is not correlated with adjacent DHR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17922149      PMCID: PMC2140131          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-007-0515-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  34 in total

1.  The development of discopathy in lumbar discs adjacent to a lumbar anterior interbody spondylodesis. A retrospective matched-pair study with a postoperative follow-up of 16 years.

Authors:  J R Van Horn; L M Bohnen
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 0.500

2.  Adjacent segment degeneration in the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Gary Ghiselli; Jeffrey C Wang; Nitin N Bhatia; Wellington K Hsu; Edgar G Dawson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Correlation between disc height narrowing and low-back pain.

Authors:  V M Dabbs; L G Dabbs
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Lumbar motion segment pathology adjacent to thoracolumbar, lumbar, and lumbosacral fusions.

Authors:  J D Schlegel; J A Smith; R L Schleusener
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Long-term results of lumbar intervertebral disc prolapse.

Authors:  J C Leong; S Y Chun; W J Grange; D Fang
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Chronic low back pain and fusion: a comparison of three surgical techniques: a prospective multicenter randomized study from the Swedish lumbar spine study group.

Authors:  Peter Fritzell; Olle Hägg; Per Wessberg; Anders Nordwall
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Randomized clinical trial of lumbar instrumented fusion and cognitive intervention and exercises in patients with chronic low back pain and disc degeneration.

Authors:  Jens Ivar Brox; Roger Sørensen; Astrid Friis; Øystein Nygaard; Aage Indahl; Anne Keller; Tor Ingebrigtsen; Hege R Eriksen; Inger Holm; Anne Kathrine Koller; Rolf Riise; Olav Reikerås
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Neurological complications of lumbar artificial disc replacement and comparison of clinical results with those related to lumbar arthrodesis in the literature: results of a multicenter, prospective, randomized investigational device exemption study of Charité intervertebral disc. Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2004.

Authors:  Fred H Geisler; Scott L Blumenthal; Richard D Guyer; Paul C McAfee; John J Regan; J Patrick Johnson; Bradford Mullin
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2004-09

Review 9.  Critical analysis of trends in fusion for degenerative disc disease over the past 20 years: influence of technique on fusion rate and clinical outcome.

Authors:  Christopher M Bono; Casey K Lee
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Posterolateral lumbosacral fusion with transpedicular fixation: 63 consecutive cases followed for 4 (2-6) years.

Authors:  H Pihlajamäki; O Böstman; M Ruuskanen; P Myllynen; J Kinnunen; E Karaharju
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1996-02
View more
  34 in total

1.  [Pedicle screw-based systems for dynamic stabilization : An insight into the philosophy, technique, indications and success of these systems].

Authors:  J Richolt; M Rauschmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Influence of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration on the outcome of total lumbar disc replacement: a prospective clinical, histological, X-ray and MRI investigation.

Authors:  Christoph J Siepe; Franziska Heider; Elisabeth Haas; Wolfgang Hitzl; Ulrike Szeimies; Axel Stäbler; Christoph Weiler; Andreas G Nerlich; Michael H Mayer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  A survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2007.

Authors:  Robert C Mulholland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  A prospective randomised study on the long-term effect of lumbar fusion on adjacent disc degeneration.

Authors:  Per Ekman; Hans Möller; Adel Shalabi; Yiang Xiao Yu; Rune Hedlund
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal Review: a survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2009.

Authors:  Robert C Mulholland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-12-19       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Elastic modulus in the selection of interbody implants.

Authors:  Robert F Heary; Naresh Parvathreddy; Sujitha Sampath; Nitin Agarwal
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-06

7.  Adjacent disc height reduction and clinical outcome after intradiscal cement leakage.

Authors:  Minjie Shen; Junjie Niu; Haifei Zhou; Qian Meng; Minfeng Gan; Huilin Yang
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-10-05

8.  Reoperation of decompression alone or decompression plus fusion surgeries for degenerative lumbar diseases: a systematic review.

Authors:  Zhao Lang; Jing-Sheng Li; Felix Yang; Yan Yu; Kamran Khan; Louis G Jenis; Thomas D Cha; James D Kang; Guoan Li
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  High precision semiautomated computed tomography measurement of lumbar disk and vertebral heights.

Authors:  Sovira Tan; Jianhua Yao; Lawrence Yao; Michael M Ward
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Does Wallis implant reduce adjacent segment degeneration above lumbosacral instrumented fusion?

Authors:  Panagiotis Korovessis; Thomas Repantis; Spyros Zacharatos; Andreas Zafiropoulos
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.