Literature DB >> 17918422

Rats' choices between one and two delayed reinforcers.

James E Mazur1.   

Abstract

Rats chose between alternatives that differed in the number of reinforcers and in the delay to each reinforcer. A left leverpress led to two reinforcers, each delivered after a fixed delay. A right leverpress led to one reinforcer after an adjusting delay. The adjusting delay was increased or decreased many times in a session, depending on the rat's choices, in order to estimate an indifference point--a delay at which the two alternatives were chosen about equally often. Both the number of reinforcers and their individual delays affected the indifference points. The overall pattern of results was well described by the hyperbolic-decay model, which states that each additional reinforcer delivered by an alternative increases preference for that alternative but that a reinforcer's effect is inversely related to its delay. Two other possible delay-discounting equations, an exponential equation and a reciprocal equation, did not produce satisfactory predictions for these data. Adding an additional free parameter to the hyperbolic equation as an exponent for delay did not appreciably improve the predictions, suggesting that raising delay to some power other than 1.0 was unnecessary. The results were qualitatively similar to those from a previous experiment with pigeons, but quantitative differences suggested that the rates of delay discounting were several times slower for rats than for pigeons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17918422      PMCID: PMC2405941          DOI: 10.3758/bf03193052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  15 in total

1.  Tradeoffs among delay, rate, and amount of reinforcement.

Authors: 
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2000-03-31       Impact factor: 1.777

2.  Choice with delayed and probabilistic reinforcers: effects of variability, time between trials, and conditioned reinforcers.

Authors:  J E Mazur; A Romano
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Notes on discounting.

Authors:  Howard Rachlin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Discounting of delayed rewards: Models of individual choice.

Authors:  J Myerson; L Green
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Choice and multiple reinforcers.

Authors:  J Moore
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Choice and number of reinforcers.

Authors:  J Moore
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Theories of probabilistic reinforcement.

Authors:  J E Mazur
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Choice between single and multiple delayed reinforcers.

Authors:  J E Mazur
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  On the measurement of reinforcement frequency in the study of preference.

Authors:  P Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Adjusting delay to reinforcement: comparing choice in pigeons and humans.

Authors:  M L Rodriguez; A W Logue
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1988-01
View more
  20 in total

1.  Preventative treatment in an animal model of ADHD: Behavioral and biochemical effects of methylphenidate and its interactions with ovarian hormones in female rats.

Authors:  Jodi L Lukkes; Nadja Freund; Britta S Thompson; Shirisha Meda; Susan L Andersen
Journal:  Eur Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 4.600

2.  Delay-amount tradeoffs in choices by pigeons and rats: hyperbolic versus exponential discounting.

Authors:  James E Mazur; Dawn R Biondi
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Transitional and steady-state choice behavior under an adjusting-delay schedule.

Authors:  L Valencia Torres; S da Costa Araújo; C M Olarte Sanchez; S Body; C M Bradshaw; E Szabadi
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Effect of orbitofrontal cortex lesions on temporal discounting in rats.

Authors:  Suhyun Jo; Ko-Un Kim; Daeyeol Lee; Min Whan Jung
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Temporal discounting of aversive consequences in rats.

Authors:  William Rodríguez; Arturo Bouzas; Vladimir Orduña
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  Risky choice in pigeons and humans: a cross-species comparison.

Authors:  Carla H Lagorio; Timothy D Hackenberg
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 7.  Dissecting drug effects in preclinical models of impulsive choice: emphasis on glutamatergic compounds.

Authors:  Justin R Yates
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  The role of the nucleus accumbens core in impulsive choice, timing, and reward processing.

Authors:  Tiffany Galtress; Kimberly Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.912

9.  Measurement of impulsive choice in rats: same- and alternate-form test-retest reliability and temporal tracking.

Authors:  Jennifer R Peterson; Catherine C Hill; Kimberly Kirkpatrick
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Mechanisms of Individual Differences in Impulsive and Risky Choice in Rats.

Authors:  Kimberly Kirkpatrick; Andrew T Marshall; Aaron P Smith
Journal:  Comp Cogn Behav Rev       Date:  2015
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.