Literature DB >> 17912614

Marker states and a health state prompt provide modest improvements in the reliability and validity of the standard gamble and rating scale in prostate cancer patients.

Karen E Bremner1, George Tomlinson, Murray D Krahn.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the combined effect of marker states and a prompt on the reliability and validity of direct utility assessment.
METHODS: In a structured interview, 141 prostate cancer (PC) patients provided rating scale (RS) and standard gamble (SG) utilities for their "own health" (RS-/SG-). Following self-completion of comparison instruments (two generic utility and one disease-specific psychometric), they answered a checklist of PC-related items (a prompt to consider self-health) and provided utilities for self-health and mild and severe PC marker states (RS+/SG+). The interview was repeated 5 weeks later, but without comparison instruments. Using Bayesian modeling, we computed and compared correlation coefficients to assess RS and SG test-retest reliability and validity and the effects of the prompt and marker states.
RESULTS: RS and SG had acceptable test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients = 0.57-0.63). The prompt and marker states decreased the reliability of the RS by 0.01 (from 0.58 to 0.57) but increased the reliability of the SG by 0.05 (from 0.58 to 0.63). The probability that the reliability of the SG+ was greater than that of the SG- was very high (0.96). Correlations with comparison instruments were higher by 0.01-0.06 for RS+ vs RS-, and higher by 0.03-0.06 for SG+ vs SG-. The probabilities that the prompt and marker states improved validity ranged from 0.55 to 0.74 (RS), and from 0.61 to 0.70 (SG).
CONCLUSIONS: A self-health description prompt and marker states modestly improved the reliability and validity of direct utility elicitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17912614     DOI: 10.1007/s11136-007-9264-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  42 in total

Review 1.  Multi-attribute preference functions. Health Utilities Index.

Authors:  G W Torrance; W Furlong; D Feeny; M Boyle
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Utility approach to measuring health-related quality of life.

Authors:  G W Torrance
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

3.  Dollars may not buy as many QALYs as we think: a problem with defining quality-of-life adjustments.

Authors:  D G Fryback; W F Lawrence
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1997 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 4.  Psychometric considerations in evaluating health-related quality of life measures.

Authors:  R D Hays; R Anderson; D Revicki
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  The standard gamble demonstrated lower reliability than the feeling thermometer.

Authors:  Milo A Puhan; Gordon H Guyatt; Victor M Montori; Mohit Bhandari; P J Devereaux; Lauren Griffith; Roger Goldstein; Holger J Schünemann
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  A comparison of scoring weights for the EuroQol derived from patients and the general public.

Authors:  D Polsky; R J Willke; K Scott; K A Schulman; H A Glick
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  A randomized multicenter trial to evaluate simple utility elicitation techniques in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Holger J Schünemann; David Armstrong; Alessio Degl'innocenti; Ingela Wiklund; Carlo A Fallone; Lisa Tanser; Sander Veldhuyzen Van Zanten; Diane Heels-Ansdell; Samer El-Dika; Naoki Chiba; Alan N Barkun; Peggy Austin; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Measuring quality of life in men with prostate cancer using the functional assessment of cancer therapy-prostate instrument.

Authors:  P Esper; F Mo; G Chodak; M Sinner; D Cella; K J Pienta
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Responsiveness of disease-specific and generic utility instruments in prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Murray Krahn; Karen E Bremner; George Tomlinson; Paul Ritvo; Jane Irvine; Gary Naglie
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-11-08       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Preferences of husbands and wives for outcomes of prostate cancer screening and treatment.

Authors:  Robert J Volk; Scott B Cantor; Alvah R Cass; Stephen J Spann; Susan C Weller; Murray D Krahn
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.128

View more
  5 in total

1.  "Like No One Is Listening to Me": A Qualitative Study of Patient-Provider Discordance Between Global Assessments of Disease Activity in Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Authors:  Zoran Kvrgic; Gladys B Asiedu; Cynthia S Crowson; Jennifer L Ridgeway; John M Davis
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 4.794

2.  Comparison of the construct validity and sensitivity to change of the visual analog scale and a modified rating scale as measures of patient global assessment in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Chili Lati; Lori C Guthrie; Michael M Ward
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 4.666

3.  Patient values and preferences regarding VTE disease: a systematic review to inform American Society of Hematology guidelines.

Authors:  Itziar Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta; Yuan Zhang; Francesca Brundisini; Ivan D Florez; Wojtek Wiercioch; Robby Nieuwlaat; Housne Begum; Carlos A Cuello; Yetiani Roldan; Ru Chen; Chengyi Ding; Rebecca L Morgan; John J Riva; Yuqing Zhang; Rana Charide; Arnav Agarwal; Sara Balduzzi; Gian Paolo Morgano; Juan José Yepes-Nuñez; Yasir Rehman; Ignacio Neumann; Nicole Schwab; Tejan Baldeh; Cody Braun; María Francisca Rodríguez; Holger J Schünemann
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-03-10

Review 4.  A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prostate Cancer Utility Values of Patients and Partners Between 2007 and 2016.

Authors:  Anne Magnus; Wanrudee Isaranuwatchai; Cathrine Mihalopoulos; Victoria Brown; Rob Carter
Journal:  MDM Policy Pract       Date:  2019-05-27

5.  Measuring prostate-specific quality of life in prostate cancer patients scheduled for radiotherapy or radical prostatectomy and reference men in Germany and Canada using the Patient Oriented Prostate Utility Scale-Psychometric (PORPUS-P).

Authors:  Annika Waldmann; Volker Rohde; Karen Bremner; Murray Krahn; Thomas Kuechler; Alexander Katalinic
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-08-23       Impact factor: 4.430

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.