OBJECTIVE: To explore the preferences of male primary care patients and their spouses for the outcomes of prostate cancer screening and treatment, and quality of life with metastatic prostate cancer. DESIGN: Cross-sectional design. SETTING: Primary care clinics in Galveston County, Texas. PATIENTS: One hundred sixty-eight couples in which the husband was a primary care patient and a candidate for prostate cancer screening. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Preferences were measured as utilities for treatment outcomes and quality of life with metastatic disease by the time trade-off method for the husband and the wife individually and then conjointly for the couple. For each health state considered, husbands associated lower utilities for the health states than did their wives. Couples' utilities fell between those of husbands and wives (all comparisons were significant at P <.01). For partial and complete impotence and mild-to-moderate incontinence, the median utility value for the wives was 1.0, indicating that most wives did not associate disutility with their husbands having to experience these treatment complications. CONCLUSIONS: Male primary care patients who are candidates for prostate cancer screening evaluate the outcomes of prostate cancer treatment and life with advanced prostate cancer as being far worse than do their wives. Because the choice between quantity and quality of life is a highly individualistic one, both the patient and his partner should be involved in making decisions about prostate cancer screening. J
OBJECTIVE: To explore the preferences of male primary care patients and their spouses for the outcomes of prostate cancer screening and treatment, and quality of life with metastatic prostate cancer. DESIGN: Cross-sectional design. SETTING: Primary care clinics in Galveston County, Texas. PATIENTS: One hundred sixty-eight couples in which the husband was a primary care patient and a candidate for prostate cancer screening. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Preferences were measured as utilities for treatment outcomes and quality of life with metastatic disease by the time trade-off method for the husband and the wife individually and then conjointly for the couple. For each health state considered, husbands associated lower utilities for the health states than did their wives. Couples' utilities fell between those of husbands and wives (all comparisons were significant at P <.01). For partial and complete impotence and mild-to-moderate incontinence, the median utility value for the wives was 1.0, indicating that most wives did not associate disutility with their husbands having to experience these treatment complications. CONCLUSIONS: Male primary care patients who are candidates for prostate cancer screening evaluate the outcomes of prostate cancer treatment and life with advanced prostate cancer as being far worse than do their wives. Because the choice between quantity and quality of life is a highly individualistic one, both the patient and his partner should be involved in making decisions about prostate cancer screening. J
Authors: J L Stanford; Z Feng; A S Hamilton; F D Gilliland; R A Stephenson; J W Eley; P C Albertsen; L C Harlan; A L Potosky Journal: JAMA Date: 2000-01-19 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: A L Potosky; J Legler; P C Albertsen; J L Stanford; F D Gilliland; A S Hamilton; J W Eley; R A Stephenson; L C Harlan Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-10-04 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Scott B Cantor; Robert J Volk; Murray D Krahn; Alvah R Cass; Jawaria Gilani; Susan C Weller; Stephen J Spann Journal: Patient Date: 2008-01-01 Impact factor: 3.883
Authors: Quoc-Dien Trinh; Jesse Sammon; Jay Jhaveri; Maxine Sun; Khurshid R Ghani; Jan Schmitges; Wooju Jeong; James O Peabody; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Mani Menon Journal: Ther Adv Urol Date: 2012-04
Authors: Floyd J Fowler; Michael J Barry; Beth Walker-Corkery; Jean-Francois Caubet; David W Bates; Jeong Min Lee; Alison Hauser; Mary McNaughton-Collins Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Jennifer D Allen; Megan K D Othus; Alton Hart; Anshu P Mohllajee; Yi Li; Deborah Bowen Journal: Med Decis Making Date: 2010-05-18 Impact factor: 2.583
Authors: Stephanie L McFall; Patricia D Mullen; Theresa L Byrd; Scott B Cantor; Yen-Chi Le; Isabel Torres-Vigil; Curtis Pettaway; Robert J Volk Journal: Health Expect Date: 2014-02-09 Impact factor: 3.377