Literature DB >> 11407419

False recall and false recognition induced by presentation of associated words: effects of retention interval and level of processing.

A Thapar1, K B McDermott.   

Abstract

The effects of retention interval and level of processing on false recall and false recognition of associates were examined. False recall and false recognition were induced by presenting subjects with words closely associated with a non-studied word. Both level of processing and retention interval affected false recall (Experiment 1) and false recognition (Experiment 2) in the same direction with which they affected accurate recall and accurate recognition. That is, semantically processed lists exhibited higher levels of later false recall and false recognition than did superficially processed lists. Furthermore, a decline in false recall and false recognition occurred across retention intervals of 0, 2, and 7 days. However, the decline in false recall and false recognition was less pronounced than the decline in accurate recall and accurate recognition. Results are consistent with source monitoring and fuzzy trace explanations of false recall and false recognition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11407419     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196393

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  9 in total

1.  Reducing gist-based false recognition in older adults: encoding and retrieval manipulations.

Authors:  W Koutstaal; D L Schacter; L Galluccio; K A Stofer
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1999-06

2.  The effects of a levels-of-processing manipulation on false recall.

Authors:  M G Rhodes; J S Anastasi
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-03

3.  Recall accuracy and illusory memories: when more is less.

Authors:  M P Toglia; J S Neuschatz; K A Goodwin
Journal:  Memory       Date:  1999-03

4.  Norms for word lists that create false memories.

Authors:  M A Stadler; H L Roediger; K B McDermott
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-05

5.  On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall.

Authors:  J DEESE
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1959-07

6.  From a passing thought to a false memory in 2 minutes: Confusing real and illusory events.

Authors:  J D Read
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1996-03

7.  Evaluating characteristics of false memories: remember/know judgments and memory characteristics questionnaire compared.

Authors:  M Mather; L A Henkel; M K Johnson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-11

8.  False recognition in younger and older adults: exploring the characteristics of illusory memories.

Authors:  K A Norman; D L Schacter
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-11

Review 9.  Source monitoring.

Authors:  M K Johnson; S Hashtroudi; D S Lindsay
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 17.737

  9 in total
  37 in total

1.  Factors that determine false recall: a multiple regression analysis.

Authors:  H L Roediger; J M Watson; K B McDermott; D A Gallo
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-09

2.  The reliability of the DRM paradigm as a measure of individual differences in false memories.

Authors:  Irene V Blair; Alison P Lenton; Reid Hastie
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-09

3.  Are false memories more difficult to forget than accurate memories? The effect of retention interval on recall and recognition.

Authors:  John G Seamon; Chun R Luo; Jonathan J Kopecky; Catherine A Price; Leeatt Rothschld; Nicholas S Fung; Michael A Schwartz
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-10

4.  False recognition without intentional learning.

Authors:  Michael D Dodd; Colin M MacLeod
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-02

5.  "Identify-to-reject": a specific strategy to avoid false memories in the DRM paradigm.

Authors:  Paula Carneiro; Angel Fernandez; Emiliano Diez; Leonel Garcia-Marques; Tânia Ramos; Mário B Ferreira
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-02

Review 6.  False memories and fantastic beliefs: 15 years of the DRM illusion.

Authors:  David A Gallo
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-10

7.  How Does Distinctive Processing Reduce False Recall?

Authors:  R Reed Hunt; Rebekah E Smith; Kathryn R Dunlap
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 3.059

8.  The importance of material-processing interactions in inducing false memories.

Authors:  Jason C K Chan; Kathleen B McDermott; Jason M Watson; David A Gallo
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-04

9.  The role of test structure in creating false memories.

Authors:  Jennifer H Coane; Dawn M McBride
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-07

10.  Falsely recalled items are rich in item-specific information.

Authors:  Daniel J Burns; Carin L Jenkins; Erica E Dean
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.