Literature DB >> 17910057

A general approach for developing system-specific functions to score protein-ligand docked complexes using support vector inductive logic programming.

Ata Amini1, Paul J Shrimpton, Stephen H Muggleton, Michael J E Sternberg.   

Abstract

Despite the increased recent use of protein-ligand and protein-protein docking in the drug discovery process due to the increases in computational power, the difficulty of accurately ranking the binding affinities of a series of ligands or a series of proteins docked to a protein receptor remains largely unsolved. This problem is of major concern in lead optimization procedures and has lead to the development of scoring functions tailored to rank the binding affinities of a series of ligands to a specific system. However, such methods can take a long time to develop and their transferability to other systems remains open to question. Here we demonstrate that given a suitable amount of background information a new approach using support vector inductive logic programming (SVILP) can be used to produce system-specific scoring functions. Inductive logic programming (ILP) learns logic-based rules for a given dataset that can be used to describe properties of each member of the set in a qualitative manner. By combining ILP with support vector machine regression, a quantitative set of rules can be obtained. SVILP has previously been used in a biological context to examine datasets containing a series of singular molecular structures and properties. Here we describe the use of SVILP to produce binding affinity predictions of a series of ligands to a particular protein. We also for the first time examine the applicability of SVILP techniques to datasets consisting of protein-ligand complexes. Our results show that SVILP performs comparably with other state-of-the-art methods on five protein-ligand systems as judged by similar cross-validated squares of their correlation coefficients. A McNemar test comparing SVILP to CoMFA and CoMSIA across the five systems indicates our method to be significantly better on one occasion. The ability to graphically display and understand the SVILP-produced rules is demonstrated and this feature of ILP can be used to derive hypothesis for future ligand design in lead optimization procedures. The approach can readily be extended to evaluate the binding affinities of a series of protein-protein complexes. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17910057     DOI: 10.1002/prot.21782

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  10 in total

1.  Improving molecular docking through eHiTS' tunable scoring function.

Authors:  Orr Ravitz; Zsolt Zsoldos; Aniko Simon
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Exploring fragment-based target-specific ranking protocol with machine learning on cathepsin S.

Authors:  Yuwei Yang; Jianing Lu; Chao Yang; Yingkai Zhang
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Automated site preparation in physics-based rescoring of receptor ligand complexes.

Authors:  Chaya S Rapp; Cheryl Schonbrun; Matthew P Jacobson; Chakrapani Kalyanaraman; Niu Huang
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2009-10

4.  Discovering rules for protein-ligand specificity using support vector inductive logic programming.

Authors:  Lawrence A Kelley; Paul J Shrimpton; Stephen H Muggleton; Michael J E Sternberg
Journal:  Protein Eng Des Sel       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 1.650

5.  In pursuit of virtual lead optimization: the role of the receptor structure and ensembles in accurate docking.

Authors:  Erin S D Bolstad; Amy C Anderson
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2008-11-15

6.  Open Babel: An open chemical toolbox.

Authors:  Noel M O'Boyle; Michael Banck; Craig A James; Chris Morley; Tim Vandermeersch; Geoffrey R Hutchison
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 5.514

Review 7.  Structure-based virtual screening for drug discovery: a problem-centric review.

Authors:  Tiejun Cheng; Qingliang Li; Zhigang Zhou; Yanli Wang; Stephen H Bryant
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 4.009

8.  Physicochemical Heuristics for Identifying High Fidelity, Near-Native Structural Models of Peptide/MHC Complexes.

Authors:  Grant L J Keller; Laura I Weiss; Brian M Baker
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 8.786

9.  A machine learning approach to predicting protein-ligand binding affinity with applications to molecular docking.

Authors:  Pedro J Ballester; John B O Mitchell
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 10.  Machine-learning scoring functions to improve structure-based binding affinity prediction and virtual screening.

Authors:  Qurrat Ul Ain; Antoniya Aleksandrova; Florian D Roessler; Pedro J Ballester
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Mol Sci       Date:  2015-08-28
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.