Literature DB >> 11572356

Wideband reflectance tympanometry in chinchillas and human.

R H Margolis1, S Paul, G L Saly, P A Schachern, D H Keefe.   

Abstract

Wideband reflectance tympanometry was performed on twelve chinchillas ears. The complex input impedance of the middle ear, multifrequency admittance tympanograms, reflectance patterns (reflectance versus frequency), and reflectance tympanograms (reflectance versus ear-canal air pressure) were analyzed and compared to human data. The complex impedance of the chinchilla ear has a lower stiffness reactance at low frequencies, a higher mass reactance at high frequencies, and a lower resistance compared to the human. Multifrequency admittance tympanograms from chinchillas follow the same sequence of patterns as humans for low frequencies (<2 kHz). At higher frequencies tympanograms from both species are poorly organized and do not follow a consistent sequence of patterns. Reflectance patterns of chinchillas and humans are different. However, both species show high reflectance at low frequencies, regions of lower reflectance in mid-frequencies (2-6 kHz), and high reflectance at high frequencies (>8 kHz). Reflectance tympanograms for the two species show a single, centrally located minimum at low frequencies (<2 kHz) and are substantially different at higher frequencies. Results are shown for two animals that underwent eustachian tube obstruction. Reflectance patterns obtained with different ear-canal air pressures are substantially different. Reflectance results at any single ear-canal pressure (including ambient pressure) do not completely characterize the effects of middle-ear pathology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11572356     DOI: 10.1121/1.1394219

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  9 in total

1.  Sound pressure distribution and power flow within the gerbil ear canal from 100 Hz to 80 kHz.

Authors:  Michael E Ravicz; Elizabeth S Olson; John J Rosowski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Factors affecting sound energy absorbance in acute otitis media model of chinchilla.

Authors:  Xiying Guan; Thomas W Seale; Rong Z Gan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Pressurized Wideband Acoustic Stapedial Reflex Thresholds: Normal Development and Relationships to Auditory Function in Infants.

Authors:  Lisa L Hunter; Douglas H Keefe; M Patrick Feeney; Denis F Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-12-07

4.  Human middle-ear model with compound eardrum and airway branching in mastoid air cells.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Acoustic Immittance, Absorbance, and Reflectance in the Human Ear Canal.

Authors:  John J Rosowski; Laura Ann Wilber
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2015-02

Review 6.  Universal newborn hearing screening in 2010.

Authors:  Daniel Choo; Jareen Meinzen-Derr
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.064

7.  Chinchilla middle-ear admittance and sound power: high-frequency estimates and effects of inner-ear modifications.

Authors:  Michael E Ravicz; John J Rosowski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Sound-conduction effects on distortion-product otoacoustic emission screening outcomes in newborn infants: test performance of wideband acoustic transfer functions and 1-kHz tympanometry.

Authors:  Chris A Sanford; Douglas H Keefe; Yi-Wen Liu; Denis Fitzpatrick; Ryan W McCreery; Dawna E Lewis; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Effect of contralateral stimulation on acoustic reflectance measurements.

Authors:  Tathiany Silva Pichelli; Jordana Costa Soares; Bruna Carla Cibin; Renata Mota Mamede Carvallo
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-07-21
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.