Literature DB >> 17901944

[Hemiarthroplasty or total shoulder replacement in glenohumeral osteoarthritis?].

M Rickert1, M Loew.   

Abstract

Shoulder arthroplasty has proven to be a successful option in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Although introduced in the 1970s by Ch. Neer, resurfacing of the glenoid remains controversial. With regard to some single prospective studies total shoulder replacement (TSR) seems to be superior to humeral head replacement (HHR) in the treatment of concentric osteoarthritis. The current literature shows that TSR leads to a better shoulder function and less pain. The decision on whether to perform a TSR or HHR should be guided by the individual pathology. The final treatment should be reliable in terms of a better shoulder function, reduced pain, and good strength. The role of glenoid loosening in TSR and its impact on shoulder function in the long term remains uncertain and has to be clarified in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17901944     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-007-1149-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  12 in total

1.  Shoulder arthroplasty with or without resurfacing of the glenoid in patients who have osteoarthritis.

Authors:  G M Gartsman; T S Roddey; S M Hammerman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 2.  Indications for glenoid resurfacing in shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  M W Rodosky; L U Bigliani
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  Glenoid revision surgery after total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  S A Antuna; J W Sperling; R H Cofield; C M Rowland
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.019

4.  A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder.

Authors:  C R Constant; A H Murley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  A comparison of pain, strength, range of motion, and functional outcomes after hemiarthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthritis of the shoulder. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dianne Bryant; Robert Litchfield; Michael Sandow; Gary M Gartsman; Gordon Guyatt; Alexandra Kirkley
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Hemiarthroplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis: results correlated to degree of glenoid wear.

Authors:  W N Levine; M Djurasovic; J M Glasson; R G Pollock; E L Flatow; L U Bigliani
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.019

7.  Morphologic study of the glenoid in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis.

Authors:  G Walch; R Badet; A Boulahia; A Khoury
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Conversion of painful hemiarthroplasty to total shoulder arthroplasty: long-term results.

Authors:  Raymond M Carroll; Rolando Izquierdo; Michael Vazquez; Theodore A Blaine; William N Levine; Louis U Bigliani
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.019

9.  A comparison of hemiarthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis: results of a multicenter study.

Authors:  T Bradley Edwards; Nimish R Kadakia; Aziz Boulahia; Jean-François Kempf; Pascal Boileau; Chantal Némoz; Gilles Walch
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.019

10.  Hemiarthroplasty versus total shoulder prosthesis: results of cemented glenoid components.

Authors:  M Pfahler; F Jena; L Neyton; F Sirveaux; D Molé
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.019

View more
  2 in total

1.  Complications in shoulder arthroplasty: an analysis of 485 cases.

Authors:  Peter R Aldinger; Patric Raiss; Markus Rickert; Markus Loew
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  [Cementless humeral surface replacement arthroplasty in patients less than 55 years of age].

Authors:  P Raiss; G Pape; S Becker; M Rickert; M Loew
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.087

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.