Literature DB >> 19768450

[Cementless humeral surface replacement arthroplasty in patients less than 55 years of age].

P Raiss1, G Pape, S Becker, M Rickert, M Loew.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cementless humeral surface replacement arthroplasty is a viable treatment option for degenerative diseases of the shoulder joint. The aim of this prospective study was to analyse the results of this treatment option in patients younger than 55 years of age with different pathologies of the shoulder. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-three patients (26 implants) treated with cementless humeral surface replacement arthroplasty were included in this study. Mean follow-up was 2.5 years (1-6 years). Ten patients had posttraumatic osteoarthritis, seven had primary osteoarthritis, and six had osteonecrosis. Patients were evaluated using the Constant score, shoulder motion, and subjective satisfaction.
RESULTS: The mean Constant score increased significantly from 33 points preoperatively (8-69 points) to 61 points postoperatively (25-83 points; p<0.0001), adjusted to age and gender from 38% (8-86%) to 70% (28-114%; p<0.0001). Significant improvement for the whole cohort was found regarding patients' pain, activity, mobility, shoulder flexion and abduction, and internal and external rotation (p<0.001). In one case, reoperation was necessary due to a superficial wound infection, and in another case, implant revision to a total shoulder replacement was performed because of glenoid erosion.
CONCLUSION: Cementless humeral surface replacement arthroplasty is a viable bone-preserving treatment option for young and active patients. Later conversion to total shoulder replacement is possible. Good clinical results, a low complication rate, and high patient satisfaction were found in the short and mid term. Long-term investigations are necessary to confirm these observations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19768450     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-009-1525-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  32 in total

Review 1.  Total shoulder arthroplasty in the young patient.

Authors:  P R Hayes; E L Flatow
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  2001

2.  Proximal humerus fracture sequelae: impact of a new radiographic classification on arthroplasty.

Authors:  Pascal Boileau; Christopher Chuinard; Jean-Charles Le Huec; Gilles Walch; Christophe Trojani
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Arthroscopically assisted core decompression of the proximal humerus for avascular necrosis.

Authors:  Cary Chapman; Christopher Mattern; William N Levine
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 4.  Arthroplasty of the shoulder.

Authors:  P Boileau; R J Sinnerton; C Chuinard; G Walch
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2006-05

Review 5.  Nonarthroplasty alternatives for the treatment of glenohumeral arthritis.

Authors:  Brian J Cole; Adam Yanke; Matthew T Provencher
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2007-07-23       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  Quality-of-life outcome following hemiarthroplasty or total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthritis. A prospective, randomized trial.

Authors:  Ian K Y Lo; Robert B Litchfield; Sharon Griffin; Ken Faber; Stuart D Patterson; Alexandra Kirkley
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 7.  Shoulder arthritis in the young adult: arthroscopy to arthroplasty.

Authors:  John W Sperling; Scott P Steinmann; Frank A Cordasco; D Ross Henshaw; David A Coons; Wayne Z Burkhead
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  2006

8.  Morphologic study of the glenoid in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis.

Authors:  G Walch; R Badet; A Boulahia; A Khoury
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Shoulder arthroplasty in the young patient.

Authors:  Paul L Burroughs; Peter F Gearen; William R Petty; Thomas W Wright
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 10.  Management of glenohumeral arthritis: a role for arthroscopy?

Authors:  Julie Y Bishop; Evan L Flatow
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.472

View more
  5 in total

1.  Resurfacing hemiarthroplasty compared to stemmed hemiarthroplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis: a randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Jeppe V Rasmussen; Bo S Olsen; Anne Kathrine Sorensen; Asbjørn Hróbjartsson; Stig Brorson
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  [Survival rate and complications of stemmed shoulder prostheses in primary osteoarthritis].

Authors:  U Irlenbusch
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Results of cementless humeral head resurfacing with cemented glenoid components.

Authors:  Patric Raiss; Manuela Weiter; Boris Sowa; Felix Zeifang; Markus Loew
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  [Shoulder arthroplasty].

Authors:  Dennis Wassenaar; André Busch; Alexander Wegner; Marcus Jäger
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Cementless humeral head resurfacing for degenerative glenohumeral osteoarthritis fails at a high rate.

Authors:  Michael W Maier; Pit Hetto; Patric Raiss; Matthias Klotz; Matthias Bülhoff; David Spranz; Felix Zeifang
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-02-21
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.