Literature DB >> 17893530

Corneal transplant rejection rate and severity after endothelial keratoplasty.

Bruce D S Allan1, Mark A Terry, Francis W Price, Marianne O Price, Neil B Griffin, Margareta Claesson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine the corneal transplant rejection rate and the rate of graft failure subsequent to rejection in the first 2 years after endothelial keratoplasty (EK) and to compare this to background data for similar cases of penetrating keratoplasty (PK).
METHODS: Anonymized data from consecutive cases of EK [deep lamellar (DLEK) or Descemet stripping (DSEK)] for Fuchs corneal endothelial dystrophy or pseudophakic bullous keratopathy operated on before August 2004 were collected in 4 participating centers. The number and timing of rejection episodes and cases of subsequent graft failure were recorded, together with the time to cessation of topical steroid medication. Two-year postoperative findings were compared with background data for similar patients undergoing PK recorded in the Swedish Corneal Transplant Registry.
RESULTS: Rejection episodes were less frequent after EK than PK (P = 0.035). Fifteen (7.5%) of 199 EK cases had a rejection episode in the first 2 years after surgery versus 92 (13%) of 708 PK cases. Graft failure after rejection in EK may have been less frequent than in PK (P = 0.063), with only 1 (6.7%) case of rejection after EK versus 26 (28.3%) cases of rejection after PK proceeding to graft failure. A strong trend toward continued use of low-dose topical steroid medication was observed in the EK group. Eighty percent of EK patients were still taking topical steroid medication 2 years after surgery, whereas topical steroid medication had been ceased within a year of surgery in almost all PK patients in the comparator group.
CONCLUSIONS: Corneal transplant rejection is less frequent and may be less severe after EK than after PK. It is not yet clear whether these apparent differences are simply a product of relatively prolonged postoperative topical steroid cover in EK patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17893530     DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31812f66e5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cornea        ISSN: 0277-3740            Impact factor:   2.651


  36 in total

1.  [Immune reactions to posterior lamellar versus penetrating keratoplasty. A retrospective analysis].

Authors:  E Bertelmann; C Seeger; P Rieck; N Torun
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Machine learning for segmenting cells in corneal endothelium images.

Authors:  Chaitanya Kolluru; Beth A Benetz; Naomi Joseph; Harry J Menegay; Jonathan H Lass; David Wilson
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2019-03-13

Review 3.  Surgical strategies to improve visual outcomes in corneal transplantation.

Authors:  M S Rajan
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Five-year outcomes of eyes with glaucoma drainage device and penetrating keratoplasty.

Authors:  Robert M Knape; Tiffany N Szymarek; Sonal S Tuli; William T Driebe; Mark B Sherwood; Mary Fran Smith
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Descemet's Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Versus Descemet's Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty in the United States.

Authors:  Allister Gibbons; Ella H Leung; Sonia H Yoo
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  A comparison of posterior lamellar keratoplasty modalities: DLEK vs. DSEK.

Authors:  Chan-Hui Yi; Dong-Hoon Lee; Eui-Sang Chung; Tae-Young Chung
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-08-03

7.  Comparative cost-effectiveness analysis of descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty in the United States.

Authors:  Shreya S Prabhu; Rola Kaakeh; Alan Sugar; Dean G Smith; Roni M Shtein
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-09-08       Impact factor: 5.258

8.  Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty: is it an option for congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy?

Authors:  Roberto Pineda; Vandana Jain; Debraj Shome; David C Hunter; Sundaram Natarajan
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-07-19       Impact factor: 2.031

9.  Histopathological findings of failed grafts following Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK).

Authors:  Hind Alkatan; Ali Al-Rajhi; Ali Al-Shehri; Ali Khairi
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-06-01

10.  Descemet stripping and endothelial keratoplasty in endothelial dysfunctions: three-month results in 75 eyes.

Authors:  Samar K Basak
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.848

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.