Literature DB >> 22354579

[Immune reactions to posterior lamellar versus penetrating keratoplasty. A retrospective analysis].

E Bertelmann1, C Seeger, P Rieck, N Torun.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Posterior lamellar keratoplasty is a relatively new surgical procedure for replacing the diseased endothelial layer of the cornea with a healthy layer. There are only few data regarding graft rejection in posterior lamellar keratoplasty. The objective of this paper was to compare posterior lamellar keratoplasty with penetrating keratoplasty for the incidence and risk of graft rejection.
METHODS: This retrospective study included a total of 204 consecutive patients who underwent penetrating keratoplasty or posterior lamellar keratoplasty at the Department of Ophthalmology, Charité CVK, between 1999 and 2000 and between 2007 and 2009. Complete data were obtained in 160 cases. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences), version 12.0. Descriptive statistics, χ(2)-test and mean values were used to describe and assess the data.
RESULTS: Out of 160 eyes 29 were treated with posterior lamellar keratoplasty and 131 eyes were treated with penetrating keratoplasty. The incidence of graft rejection was 3.4% in the posterior lamellar group and 29.8% in the penetrating keratoplasty group (χ(2) = 9.02, p < 0.001). Of 44 patients with Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy (FED) 28 underwent posterior lamellar keratoplasty and 16 patients were treated with penetrating keratoplasty. The incidence of graft rejection in this group was 3.6% after posterior lamellar keratoplasty and 18.75% after penetrating keratoplasty.
CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective study with univariate analysis of risk factors, graft rejection was less frequent after posterior lamellar keratoplasty than after penetrating keratoplasty. A comparison of both groups was limited because of different indications for surgery. Posterior lamellar keratoplasty decreased the risk of graft rejection under conditions with the same indications (Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22354579     DOI: 10.1007/s00347-011-2486-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmologe        ISSN: 0941-293X            Impact factor:   1.059


  15 in total

1.  Beneficial effect of HLA-DR matching on the survival of corneal allografts.

Authors:  H J Völker-Dieben; F H Claas; G M Schreuder; R F Schipper; E Pels; G G Persijn; J Smits; J D'Amaro
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2000-08-27       Impact factor: 4.939

2.  Comparative cohort study of the outcomes of deep lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus.

Authors:  C L Funnell; J Ball; B A Noble
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Descemet's stripping with endothelial keratoplasty: comparative outcomes with microkeratome-dissected and manually dissected donor tissue.

Authors:  Marianne O Price; Francis W Price
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2006-08-28       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Mark S Gorovoy
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.651

5.  Early results of small-incision Descemet's stripping and automated endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Steven B Koenig; Douglas J Covert
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2006-12-05       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Patterns of rejection after deep lamellar keratoplasty.

Authors:  Stephanie L Watson; Stephen J Tuft; John K G Dart
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  [Corneal allograft rejection after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK): report of three cases].

Authors:  C Ponchel; J-L Arné; F Malecaze; P Fournié
Journal:  J Fr Ophtalmol       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 0.818

8.  Corneal transplant rejection rate and severity after endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Bruce D S Allan; Mark A Terry; Francis W Price; Marianne O Price; Neil B Griffin; Margareta Claesson
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.651

9.  [Deep lamellar keratoplasty].

Authors:  F Trimarchi; E Poppi; C Klersy
Journal:  J Fr Ophtalmol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 0.818

10.  Will Descemet's stripping with automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) lower the rates of allograft rejection in corneal transplants for endothelial failure?

Authors:  Gaurav Prakash; Vishal Jhanji; Jeewan Singh Titiyal
Journal:  Med Hypotheses       Date:  2007-04-11       Impact factor: 1.538

View more
  2 in total

1.  [Prevention and management of complications in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK)].

Authors:  C Cursiefen; P Steven; S Roters; L M Heindl
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Tectonic DSAEK for the Management of Impending Corneal Perforation.

Authors:  Enrique O Graue-Hernandez; Isaac Zuñiga-Gonzalez; Julio C Hernandez-Camarena; Martha Jaimes; Patricia Chirinos-Saldaña; Alejandro Navas; Arturo Ramirez-Miranda
Journal:  Case Rep Ophthalmol Med       Date:  2012-12-05
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.