Literature DB >> 21602705

Five-year outcomes of eyes with glaucoma drainage device and penetrating keratoplasty.

Robert M Knape1, Tiffany N Szymarek, Sonal S Tuli, William T Driebe, Mark B Sherwood, Mary Fran Smith.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate intraocular pressure (IOP) control and corneal graft survival rates in eyes with glaucoma drainage device (GDD) implantation and penetrating keratoplasty (PK) and 5 years of follow-up data.
DESIGN: Retrospective review.
METHODS: We performed a review of records of all patients who underwent both GDD placement and PK at our institution between January 1, 1988 and December 31, 2003. Twenty-eight eyes of 27 patients were studied. Glaucoma outcome was assessed by postoperative IOP, number of glaucoma medications, and need for further glaucoma surgery. Corneal grafts were assessed for clarity.
RESULTS: All eyes had GDD placement in the anterior chamber. The mean pre-GDD IOP was 28.8 ± 10.3 mm Hg on a mean of 2.6 ± 0.8 glaucoma medications. At 5-year follow-up, the mean IOP was 13.0 ± 5.9 mm Hg on a mean of 0.9 ± 1.0 glaucoma medications. GDD implantation successfully controlled glaucoma in 96%, 86%, 79%, 75%, and 71% of eyes at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years, respectively. Grafts remained clear in 96%, 82%, 75%, 57%, and 54% of eyes at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years, respectively. Failure of glaucoma outcome or graft survival was associated with prior intraocular surgeries.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggests that GDD placement can provide glaucoma control in a high percentage (71%) of eyes with PK even at 5 years. Furthermore, the success of PK in eyes with GDD remains reasonable (54%) at 5 years. IOP control and graft survival rates are comparable with earlier published studies with shorter follow-up or tube placement in the vitreous cavity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21602705      PMCID: PMC3660974          DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31821db3e5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Glaucoma        ISSN: 1057-0829            Impact factor:   2.503


  34 in total

1.  Posterior repositioning of glaucoma implants for anterior segment complications.

Authors:  K M Joos; A M Laviña; K A Tawansy; A Agarwal
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 12.079

2.  Graft failure after penetrating keratoplasty in eyes with Ahmed valves.

Authors:  David A Hollander; Joann A Giaconi; Gary N Holland; Fei Yu; Joseph Caprioli; Anthony J Aldave; Anne L Coleman; Richard Casey; Simon K Law; Bartly J Mondino
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  The long-term results of keratoplasty in eyes with a glaucoma drainage device.

Authors:  Lenio S Alvarenga; Mark J Mannis; James D Brandt; William B Lee; Ivan R Schwab; Michele C Lim
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  Corneal graft survival and intraocular pressure control after penetrating keratoplasty and glaucoma drainage device implantation.

Authors:  C P Arroyave; I U Scott; F E Fantes; W J Feuer; T G Murray
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  A mathematical description of causative factors and prevention of elevated intraocular pressure after keratoplasty.

Authors:  R J Olson; H E Kaufman
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Intraolar pressure following penetrating keratoplasty.

Authors:  A R Irvine; H E Kaufman
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  Pars plana tube insertion of glaucoma drainage implants and penetrating keratoplasty in patients with coexisting glaucoma and corneal disease.

Authors:  P A Sidoti; A Y Mosny; D C Ritterband; J A Seedor
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 8.  Penetrating keratoplasty and glaucoma.

Authors:  R S Ayyala
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.048

9.  Outcome of combined Ahmed glaucoma valve implant and penetrating keratoplasty in refractory congenital glaucoma with corneal opacity.

Authors:  Abdullah A Al-Torbak
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.651

10.  Graft survival and glaucoma outcome after simultaneous penetrating keratoplasty and ahmed glaucoma valve implant.

Authors:  Abdullah Al-Torbak
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.651

View more
  12 in total

1.  Corneal transplant survival rate in glaucoma patients with multiple previous antiglaucoma surgeries.

Authors:  Sofia Fili; Kalliopi Kontopoulou; Nikolaos Bechrakis; Markus Kohlhaas
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Combined pars plana vitrectomy and Baerveldt glaucoma implant placement for refractory glaucoma.

Authors:  Thalmon R Campagnoli; Sung Soo Kim; William E Smiddy; Steve J Gedde; Donald L Budenz; Richard K Parrish; Paul F Palmberg; William Feuer; Wei Shi
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Combined penetrating keratoplasty, pars plana vitrectomy and Ahmed glaucoma valve implant after open globe injury: a challenging approach.

Authors:  João Beato; António B Melo; Pedro A Faria; Luís Torrão; Fernando Falcão-Reis
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11-18       Impact factor: 1.779

4.  Comparison of graft survival following penetrating keratoplasty and Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty in eyes with a glaucoma drainage device.

Authors:  Shawn M Iverson; Oriel Spierer; George C Papachristou; William J Feuer; Wei Shi; David S Greenfield; Terrence P O'Brien
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 5.  Corneal Endothelial Cell Loss in Glaucoma and Glaucoma Surgery and the Utility of Management with Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK).

Authors:  Neeru A Vallabh; Stephnie Kennedy; Riccardo Vinciguerra; Keri McLean; Hannah Levis; Davide Borroni; Vito Romano; Colin E Willoughby
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-01-30       Impact factor: 1.974

6.  Clinical Outcomes of Micropulse Transscleral Cyclophotocoagulation in Patients with a History of Keratoplasty.

Authors:  Jun Hui Lee; Vivian Vu; Gabriel Lazcano-Gomez; Katherine Han; Pukkapol Suvannachart; Jennifer Rose-Nussbaumer; Julie Schallhorn; David Hwang; Ying Han
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 1.909

7.  Comparative cost-effectiveness analysis of descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty in the United States.

Authors:  Shreya S Prabhu; Rola Kaakeh; Alan Sugar; Dean G Smith; Roni M Shtein
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-09-08       Impact factor: 5.258

8.  Endothelial graft failure after contralateral autologous corneal transplantation.

Authors:  Jaime D Martinez; Anat Galor; Victor L Perez; Carol L Karp; Sonia H Yoo; Eduardo C Alfonso
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.651

9.  Comparison of long-term outcomes of trabeculectomy and risk factors for failure in eyes post penetrating keratoplasty or Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  S Ramyashri; Ashik Mohamed; Sunita Chaurasia; Sirisha Senthil
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 2.969

10.  Use of Mitomycin C to reduce the incidence of encapsulated cysts following ahmed glaucoma valve implantation in refractory glaucoma patients: a new technique.

Authors:  Minwen Zhou; Wei Wang; Wenbin Huang; Xiulan Zhang
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 2.209

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.