Literature DB >> 31762537

Machine learning for segmenting cells in corneal endothelium images.

Chaitanya Kolluru1, Beth A Benetz2,3, Naomi Joseph1, Harry J Menegay2,3, Jonathan H Lass2,3, David Wilson1,4.   

Abstract

Images of the endothelial cell layer of the cornea can be used to evaluate corneal health. Quantitative biomarkers extracted from these images such as cell density, coefficient of variation of cell area, and cell hexagonality are commonly used to evaluate the status of the endothelium. Currently, fully-automated endothelial image analysis systems in use often give inaccurate results, while semi-automated methods, requiring trained image analysis readers to identify cells manually, are both challenging and time-consuming. We are investigating two deep learning methods to automatically segment cells in such images. We compare the performance of two deep neural networks, namely U-Net and SegNet. To train and test the classifiers, a dataset of 130 images was collected, with expert reader annotated cell borders in each image. We applied standard training and testing techniques to evaluate pixel-wise segmentation performance, and report corresponding metrics such as the Dice and Jaccard coefficients. Visual evaluation of results showed that most pixel-wise errors in the U-Net were rather non-consequential. Results from the U-Net approach are being applied to create endothelial cell segmentations and quantify important morphological measurements for evaluating cornea health.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cornea; deep learning; endothelial cell segmentation

Year:  2019        PMID: 31762537      PMCID: PMC6874224          DOI: 10.1117/12.2513580

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng        ISSN: 0277-786X


  20 in total

1.  Retrospective shading correction based on entropy minimization.

Authors:  B Likar; J B Maintz; M A Viergever; F Pernus
Journal:  J Microsc       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.758

2.  Risk of corneal transplant rejection significantly reduced with Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Arundhati Anshu; Marianne O Price; Francis W Price
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 12.079

3.  Influence of applied corneal endothelium image segmentation techniques on the clinical parameters.

Authors:  Adam Piorkowski; Karolina Nurzynska; Jolanta Gronkowska-Serafin; Bettina Selig; Cezary Boldak; Daniel Reska
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 4.790

Review 4.  Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: Safety and Outcomes: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

Authors:  Sophie X Deng; W Barry Lee; Kristin M Hammersmith; Anthony N Kuo; Jennifer Y Li; Joanne F Shen; Mitchell P Weikert; Roni M Shtein
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Segmentation of corneal endothelium images using a U-Net-based convolutional neural network.

Authors:  Anna Fabijańska
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 5.326

6.  Evaluation of the corneal endothelial mosaic using an analysis of nearest neighbor distances.

Authors:  S E Bursell; B H Hultgren; R A Laing
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 3.467

7.  Endothelial cell loss after Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty in a large prospective series.

Authors:  Mark A Terry; Edwin S Chen; Neda Shamie; Karen L Hoar; Daniel J Friend
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2007-12-27       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Corneal transplant rejection rate and severity after endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Bruce D S Allan; Mark A Terry; Francis W Price; Marianne O Price; Neil B Griffin; Margareta Claesson
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.651

9.  Graft rejection episodes after Descemet stripping with endothelial keratoplasty: part two: the statistical analysis of probability and risk factors.

Authors:  M O Price; C S Jordan; G Moore; F W Price
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-11-19       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  Fully automatic evaluation of the corneal endothelium from in vivo confocal microscopy.

Authors:  Bettina Selig; Koenraad A Vermeer; Bernd Rieger; Toine Hillenaar; Cris L Luengo Hendriks
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 1.930

View more
  4 in total

1.  Deep Learning for Assessing the Corneal Endothelium from Specular Microscopy Images up to 1 Year after Ultrathin-DSAEK Surgery.

Authors:  Juan P Vigueras-Guillén; Jeroen van Rooij; Angela Engel; Hans G Lemij; Lucas J van Vliet; Koenraad A Vermeer
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-08-21       Impact factor: 3.283

2.  Automated Image Segmentation of the Corneal Endothelium in Patients With Fuchs Dystrophy.

Authors:  Palanahalli S Shilpashree; Kaggere V Suresh; Rachapalle Reddi Sudhir; Sangly P Srinivas
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 3.283

3.  Overestimation of corneal endothelial cell density by automated method in glaucomatous eyes with impaired corneal endothelial cells.

Authors:  Mayumi Minami; Etsuo Chihara
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-09-05       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  DenseUNets with feedback non-local attention for the segmentation of specular microscopy images of the corneal endothelium with guttae.

Authors:  Juan P Vigueras-Guillén; Jeroen van Rooij; Bart T H van Dooren; Hans G Lemij; Esma Islamaj; Lucas J van Vliet; Koenraad A Vermeer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 4.996

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.