Literature DB >> 17893359

Reduced C(beta) statistical potentials can outperform all-atom potentials in decoy identification.

James E Fitzgerald1, Abhishek K Jha, Andres Colubri, Tobin R Sosnick, Karl F Freed.   

Abstract

We developed a series of statistical potentials to recognize the native protein from decoys, particularly when using only a reduced representation in which each side chain is treated as a single C(beta) atom. Beginning with a highly successful all-atom statistical potential, the Discrete Optimized Protein Energy function (DOPE), we considered the implications of including additional information in the all-atom statistical potential and subsequently reducing to the C(beta) representation. One of the potentials includes interaction energies conditional on backbone geometries. A second potential separates sequence local from sequence nonlocal interactions and introduces a novel reference state for the sequence local interactions. The resultant potentials perform better than the original DOPE statistical potential in decoy identification. Moreover, even upon passing to a reduced C(beta) representation, these statistical potentials outscore the original (all-atom) DOPE potential in identifying native states for sets of decoys. Interestingly, the backbone-dependent statistical potential is shown to retain nearly all of the information content of the all-atom representation in the C(beta) representation. In addition, these new statistical potentials are combined with existing potentials to model hydrogen bonding, torsion energies, and solvation energies to produce even better performing potentials. The ability of the C(beta) statistical potentials to accurately represent protein interactions bodes well for computational efficiency in protein folding calculations using reduced backbone representations, while the extensions to DOPE illustrate general principles for improving knowledge-based potentials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17893359      PMCID: PMC2204143          DOI: 10.1110/ps.072939707

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Sci        ISSN: 0961-8368            Impact factor:   6.725


  57 in total

1.  On the design and analysis of protein folding potentials.

Authors:  D Tobi; G Shafran; N Linial; R Elber
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2000-07-01

2.  A distance-dependent atomic knowledge-based potential for improved protein structure selection.

Authors:  H Lu; J Skolnick
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2001-08-15

Review 3.  A review of protein-small molecule docking methods.

Authors:  R D Taylor; P J Jewsbury; J W Essex
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 4.  Progress in modeling of protein structures and interactions.

Authors:  Ora Schueler-Furman; Chu Wang; Phil Bradley; Kira Misura; David Baker
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-10-28       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Effective potentials for folding proteins.

Authors:  Nan-Yow Chen; Zheng-Yao Su; Chung-Yu Mou
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2006-02-22       Impact factor: 9.161

6.  A composite score for predicting errors in protein structure models.

Authors:  David Eramian; Min-yi Shen; Damien Devos; Francisco Melo; Andrej Sali; Marc A Marti-Renom
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2006-06-02       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  Derivation and testing of pair potentials for protein folding. When is the quasichemical approximation correct?

Authors:  J Skolnick; L Jaroszewski; A Kolinski; A Godzik
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 6.725

8.  Predicting protein stability changes upon mutation using database-derived potentials: solvent accessibility determines the importance of local versus non-local interactions along the sequence.

Authors:  D Gilis; M Rooman
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1997-09-19       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 9.  The formation and stabilization of protein structure.

Authors:  C B Anfinsen
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 3.857

10.  Refinement of protein structures by iterative comparative modeling and CryoEM density fitting.

Authors:  Maya Topf; Matthew L Baker; Marc A Marti-Renom; Wah Chiu; Andrej Sali
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2006-02-02       Impact factor: 5.469

View more
  18 in total

1.  A probabilistic and continuous model of protein conformational space for template-free modeling.

Authors:  Feng Zhao; Jian Peng; Joe Debartolo; Karl F Freed; Tobin R Sosnick; Jinbo Xu
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.479

2.  OPUS-PSP: an orientation-dependent statistical all-atom potential derived from side-chain packing.

Authors:  Mingyang Lu; Athanasios D Dousis; Jianpeng Ma
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2007-11-19       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Mimicking the folding pathway to improve homology-free protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Joe DeBartolo; Andrés Colubri; Abhishek K Jha; James E Fitzgerald; Karl F Freed; Tobin R Sosnick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  How well can the accuracy of comparative protein structure models be predicted?

Authors:  David Eramian; Narayanan Eswar; Min-Yi Shen; Andrej Sali
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  Automated real-space refinement of protein structures using a realistic backbone move set.

Authors:  Esmael J Haddadian; Haipeng Gong; Abhishek K Jha; Xiaojing Yang; Joe Debartolo; James R Hinshaw; Phoebe A Rice; Tobin R Sosnick; Karl F Freed
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  A Probabilistic Graphical Model for Ab Initio Folding.

Authors:  Feng Zhao; Jian Peng; Joe Debartolo; Karl F Freed; Tobin R Sosnick; Jinbo Xu
Journal:  Res Comput Mol Biol       Date:  2009

7.  Explicit orientation dependence in empirical potentials and its significance to side-chain modeling.

Authors:  Jianpeng Ma
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 22.384

8.  New statistical potential for quality assessment of protein models and a survey of energy functions.

Authors:  Dmitry Rykunov; Andras Fiser
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Orientation-dependent backbone-only residue pair scoring functions for fixed backbone protein design.

Authors:  Andrew J Bordner
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-04-16       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Fragment-free approach to protein folding using conditional neural fields.

Authors:  Feng Zhao; Jian Peng; Jinbo Xu
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 6.937

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.