M D Walker1, A Kepley2, K Nishiyama3, B Zhou4, E Guo4, T L Nickolas3. 1. Department of Medicine, Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, 10032, USA. mad2037@columbia.edu. 2. Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, USA. 3. Department of Medicine, Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, 10032, USA. 4. Bone Bioengineering Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Fu Foundation School of Engineering and Applied Science, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10027, USA.
Abstract
Hispanic men have smaller bone size but thicker and denser cortices compared to white men, leading to similar mechanical competence. INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to assess differences in vBMD and microarchitecture in young Caribbean Hispanic (n = 30) and non-Hispanic Caucasian (n = 30) men. METHODS: We measured areal bone mineral density (aBMD) at the spine, total hip (TH), femoral neck (FN), and forearm by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and bone geometry, mass, microarchitecture, and mechanical competence by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HRpQCT), individual trabecula segmentation (ITS), and finite element analysis (FEA). RESULTS: Hispanic men were slightly older, shorter, and heavier and had higher BMI compared with white men. aBMD, measured by DXA, did not differ at the spine, TH, or forearm before or after adjustment for age, height, weight, and the interaction of height and weight. At the FN, marginally significant higher BMD in Hispanics prior to adjustment was attenuated and no longer differed after adjustment for covariates. Adjusted HRpQCT indices indicated smaller total and trabecular area at the radius but greater total volumetric density and cortical thickness in Hispanic versus white men. The adjusted difference in cortical density at the radius was of borderline significance. Trabecular and ITS microstructure tended not to differ at the radius. At the tibia, results were similar. Bone size tended to be smaller and covariate-adjusted cortical density and cortical thickness were greater in Hispanic versus white men. Additionally, cortical porosity was lower at the tibia in Hispanic compared to white men. Stiffness and failure load did not differ at either skeletal site by ethnicity. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, greater cortical thickness and density as well as lower cortical porosity tend to compensate for smaller bone size in Hispanic men, leading to similar mechanical competence compared with white men.
Hispanic men have smaller bone size but thicker and denser cortices compared to white men, leading to similar mechanical competence. INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to assess differences in vBMD and microarchitecture in young Caribbean Hispanic (n = 30) and non-Hispanic Caucasian (n = 30) men. METHODS: We measured areal bone mineral density (aBMD) at the spine, total hip (TH), femoral neck (FN), and forearm by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and bone geometry, mass, microarchitecture, and mechanical competence by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HRpQCT), individual trabecula segmentation (ITS), and finite element analysis (FEA). RESULTS: Hispanic men were slightly older, shorter, and heavier and had higher BMI compared with white men. aBMD, measured by DXA, did not differ at the spine, TH, or forearm before or after adjustment for age, height, weight, and the interaction of height and weight. At the FN, marginally significant higher BMD in Hispanics prior to adjustment was attenuated and no longer differed after adjustment for covariates. Adjusted HRpQCT indices indicated smaller total and trabecular area at the radius but greater total volumetric density and cortical thickness in Hispanic versus white men. The adjusted difference in cortical density at the radius was of borderline significance. Trabecular and ITS microstructure tended not to differ at the radius. At the tibia, results were similar. Bone size tended to be smaller and covariate-adjusted cortical density and cortical thickness were greater in Hispanic versus white men. Additionally, cortical porosity was lower at the tibia in Hispanic compared to white men. Stiffness and failure load did not differ at either skeletal site by ethnicity. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, greater cortical thickness and density as well as lower cortical porosity tend to compensate for smaller bone size in Hispanic men, leading to similar mechanical competence compared with white men.
Authors: Sherita Hill Golden; Arleen Brown; Jane A Cauley; Marshall H Chin; Tiffany L Gary-Webb; Catherine Kim; Julie Ann Sosa; Anne E Sumner; Blair Anton Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2012-06-22 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: A L Kepley; K K Nishiyama; B Zhou; J Wang; C Zhang; D J McMahon; K F Foley; M D Walker; X Edward Guo; E Shane; T L Nickolas Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2016-09-16 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Jane A Cauley; Robin L Fullman; Katie L Stone; Joseph M Zmuda; Douglas C Bauer; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Kristine Ensrud; Edith M C Lau; Eric S Orwoll Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2005-05-11 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Marcella D Walker; X Sherry Liu; Emily Stein; Bin Zhou; Ervis Bezati; Donald J McMahon; Julia Udesky; George Liu; Elizabeth Shane; X Edward Guo; John P Bilezikian Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Melissa S Putman; Elaine W Yu; Hang Lee; Robert M Neer; Elizabeth Schindler; Alexander P Taylor; Emily Cheston; Mary L Bouxsein; Joel S Finkelstein Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Sanchita Agarwal; Carmen Germosen; Nayoung Kil; Mariana Bucovsky; Ivelisse Colon; John Williams; Elizabeth Shane; Marcella D Walker Journal: Bone Date: 2020-07-27 Impact factor: 4.398
Authors: Ruth Durdin; Camille M Parsons; Elaine Dennison; Nicholas C Harvey; Cyrus Cooper; Kate Ward Journal: Curr Osteoporos Rep Date: 2020-11-17 Impact factor: 5.096