Literature DB >> 17891516

Bridging the gap between evidence and practice in venous thromboembolism prophylaxis: the quality improvement process.

Franklin A Michota1.   

Abstract

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is considered to be the most common preventable cause of hospital-related death. Hospitalized patients undergoing major Surgery and hospitalized patients with acute medical illness have an increased risk of VTE. Although there is overwhelming evidence for the need and efficacy of VTE prophylaxis in patients at risk, only about a third of those who are at risk of VTE receive appropriate prophylaxis. To address the shortfall in VTE prophylaxis, the US Joint Commission and the National Quality Forum (NQF) endorse standardized VTE prophylaxis practices, and are identifying and testing measures to monitor these standards. Hospitals in the USA accredited by Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to receive medicare patients will need VTE prophylaxis programs in place to conform to these national consensus standards. This review aims to give background information on initiatives to improve the prevention of VTE and to identify key features of a successful quality improvement strategy for prevention of VTE in the hospital. A literature review shows that the key features of effective quality improvement strategies includes an active strategy, a multifaceted approach, and a continuous iterative process of audit and feedback. Risk assessment models may be helpful for deciding which patients should receive prophylaxis and for matching VTE risk with the appropriate intensity of prophylaxis. This approach should assist in implementing the NQF/Joint Commission-endorsed standards, as well as increase the use of appropriate VTE prophylaxis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17891516      PMCID: PMC2219822          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-007-0369-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  33 in total

1.  A clinical decision support system for prevention of venous thromboembolism: effect on physician behavior.

Authors:  P Durieux; R Nizard; P Ravaud; N Mounier; E Lepage
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-06-07       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Effective risk stratification of surgical and nonsurgical patients for venous thromboembolic disease.

Authors:  J A Caprini; J I Arcelus; J J Reyna
Journal:  Semin Hematol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.851

3.  Effect of a clinical pharmacy education program on improvement in the quantity and quality of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis for medically ill patients.

Authors:  Paul P Dobesh; Zachary A Stacy
Journal:  J Manag Care Pharm       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec

4.  Improved use of thromboprophylaxis for deep vein thrombosis following an educational intervention.

Authors:  Steven L Cohn; Ayoola Adekile; Vishal Mahabir
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.960

5.  Economic burden of deep-vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and post-thrombotic syndrome.

Authors:  David A MacDougall; Anthony L Feliu; Stephen J Boccuzzi; Jay Lin
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2006-10-15       Impact factor: 2.637

6.  Thromboprophylaxis in medically ill patients at risk for venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Edward Burleigh; Cheng Wang; David Foster; Sivana Heller; Dennis Dunn; Kaveh Safavi; Brian Griffin; Jeff Smith
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2006-10-15       Impact factor: 2.637

7.  An epidemiologic study of risk factors for deep vein thrombosis in medical outpatients: the Sirius study.

Authors:  M M Samama
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2000 Dec 11-25

8.  Deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis: are guidelines being followed?

Authors:  Hairul A Ahmad; Annalies Geissler; Donald G MacLellan
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 1.872

9.  Prevention of perioperative venous thromboembolism and coronary events: differential responsiveness to an intervention program to improve guidelines adherence.

Authors:  A Grupper; A Grupper; D Rudin; B Drenger; D Varon; D Gilon; Y Gielchinsky; M Menashe; Y Mintz; A Rivkind; M Brezis
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2005-10-18       Impact factor: 2.038

10.  Underuse of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis for general surgery patients: physician practices in the community hospital setting.

Authors:  D W Bratzler; G E Raskob; C K Murray; L J Bumpus; D S Piatt
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1998-09-28
View more
  20 in total

1.  Stratifying the risk of venous thromboembolism in otolaryngology.

Authors:  Andrew G Shuman; Hsou Mei Hu; Christopher J Pannucci; Christopher R Jackson; Carol R Bradford; Vinita Bahl
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 3.497

2.  Perioperative pharmacologic prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Steve Kwon; Mark Meissner; Rebecca Symons; Scott Steele; Richard Thirlby; Rick Billingham; David R Flum
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 3.  Sudden death caused by acute pulmonary embolism after laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a case report and literature review.

Authors:  C Yang; L Zhu
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in the United States: still room for improvement.

Authors:  Diane Sliwka; Margaret C Fang
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Strategies to enhance venous thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized medical patients (SENTRY): a pilot cluster randomized trial.

Authors:  Menaka Pai; Nancy S Lloyd; Ji Cheng; Lehana Thabane; Frederick A Spencer; Deborah J Cook; R Brian Haynes; Holger J Schünemann; James D Douketis
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 6.  Patterns of non-administration of ordered doses of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis: implications for novel intervention strategies.

Authors:  Kenneth M Shermock; Brandyn D Lau; Elliott R Haut; Deborah B Hobson; Valerie S Ganetsky; Peggy S Kraus; Leigh E Efird; Christoph U Lehmann; Brian L Pinto; Patricia A Ross; Michael B Streiff
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis guideline implementation is improved by nurse directed feedback and audit.

Authors:  Harry Gibbs; John Fletcher; Peter Blombery; Renea Collins; David Wheatley
Journal:  Thromb J       Date:  2011-04-05

8.  Thromboprophylaxis use in medical and surgical inpatients and the impact of an electronic risk assessment tool as part of a multi-factorial intervention. A report on behalf of the elVis study investigators.

Authors:  Edward Janus; Anmol Bassi; David Jackson; Harshal Nandurkar; Mark Yates
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.300

9.  Venous thromboembolism following colorectal surgery for suspected or confirmed malignancy.

Authors:  Brenton Sanderson; Kerry Hitos; John P Fletcher
Journal:  Thrombosis       Date:  2011-05-26

Review 10.  Interventions for implementation of thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized patients at risk for venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Susan R Kahn; David R Morrison; Gisèle Diendéré; Alexandre Piché; Kristian B Filion; Adi J Klil-Drori; James D Douketis; Jessica Emed; André Roussin; Vicky Tagalakis; Martin Morris; William Geerts
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-04-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.