Literature DB >> 17032933

Economic burden of deep-vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and post-thrombotic syndrome.

David A MacDougall1, Anthony L Feliu, Stephen J Boccuzzi, Jay Lin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) are associated with major morbidity and mortality, with their burden often extending to longer-term complications such as event recurrence and post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS). Few data exist on the overall economic burden of DVT and PE and their sequelae. A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted to determine the direct medical costs of a DVT or PE patient across the entire continuum of care.
SUMMARY: Administrative claims data for patients with a DVT or PE diagnosis (ICD-9-CM code) and patients with possible evidence of PTS between January 1, 1997, and March 31, 2004, were extracted from the PharMetrics Patient-Centric Database, which comprises fully adjudicated medical and pharmaceutical claims for U.S. health care-plan enrollees. Resource utilization and annualized direct medical costs of care for patients with DVT and/or PE were calculated and compared with matched controls. A total of 26,958 patients met the study inclusion criteria. Of the 17,634 patients evaluable for the PTS cohort, 663 (3.8%) patients experienced PTS. Patients with DVT, PE, or DVT and PE had higher annualized direct medical costs before the index (initial) DVT and/or PE event (median: $7227, $6381, and $6771, respectively) than controls (median: $1045). During and after the DVT/PE event, annualized median costs rose to $17,512, $18,901, and $25,554, respectively, compared with $680 in the control group. Annualized median total costs for the PTS group were $20,569 compared with $15,843 in matched controls with DVT and/or PE and no PTS.
CONCLUSION: These data suggest that the initial acute DVT or PE event is associated with high total health care costs and that these costs are further increased by subsequent events such as recurrent DVT or PE and PTS. Early detection and appropriate treatment of this high-risk population have the potential for both clinical and economic benefits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17032933     DOI: 10.2146/ajhp060388

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm        ISSN: 1079-2082            Impact factor:   2.637


  58 in total

1.  Using multiple sources of data for surveillance of postoperative venous thromboembolism among surgical patients treated in Department of Veterans Affairs hospitals, 2005-2010.

Authors:  Richard E Nelson; Scott D Grosse; Norman J Waitzman; Junji Lin; Scott L DuVall; Olga Patterson; James Tsai; Nimia Reyes
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 3.944

Review 2.  The economic burden of incident venous thromboembolism in the United States: A review of estimated attributable healthcare costs.

Authors:  Scott D Grosse; Richard E Nelson; Kwame A Nyarko; Lisa C Richardson; Gary E Raskob
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 3.944

3.  Cost-effectiveness of bevacizumab and ranibizumab for newly diagnosed neovascular macular degeneration.

Authors:  Joshua D Stein; Paula Anne Newman-Casey; Tavag Mrinalini; Paul P Lee; David W Hutton
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 4.  The case for catheter-directed thrombolysis in selected patients with acute proximal deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Thita Chiasakul; Adam Cuker
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2018-07-24

Review 5.  Benefits of novel oral anticoagulant agents for thromboprophylaxis after total hip or knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Richard J Friedman
Journal:  Am Health Drug Benefits       Date:  2012-03

6.  The risk of venous thromboembolism with aspirin compared to anticoagulants after hip and knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Janet N Chu; Judith Maselli; Andrew D Auerbach; Margaret C Fang
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 3.944

7.  Adherence to thromboprophylaxis guidelines in elderly patients with hospital acquired venous thromboembolism: a case control study.

Authors:  Jason Suh; Amishi Desai; Anish Desai; Josephine Dela Cruz; Anusiyanthan Mariampillai; Alexander Hindenburg
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.300

8.  Cost-effectiveness of additional catheter-directed thrombolysis for deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  T Enden; S Resch; C White; H S Wik; N E Kløw; P M Sandset
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 5.824

Review 9.  Physician alerts to prevent venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Gregory Piazza; Samuel Z Goldhaber
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 10.  The potential benefits of low-molecular-weight heparins in cancer patients.

Authors:  Francisco Robert
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 17.388

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.