Literature DB >> 11449339

Effective risk stratification of surgical and nonsurgical patients for venous thromboembolic disease.

J A Caprini1, J I Arcelus, J J Reyna.   

Abstract

Effective and safe methods of preventing venous thromboembolism (VTE) are now widely available, but a significant proportion of patients develop VTE either because thromboprophylaxis has not been used or because the intensity of thromboprophylaxis is not matched to the level of risk. Thromboembolic risk varies widely according to the clinical setting and presence of underlying risk factors, but VTE may not be suspected even in high-risk patients. Clinical risk factors for VTE include recent surgery, cancer, stroke, previous VTE, immobilization, and advanced age. Recent attention has focused on the role of inherited and acquired molecular factors in determining overall thromboembolic risk. These factors include the classic thrombophilias-deficiencies of antithrombin III, protein C, and protein S-and several newly described molecular risk factors: factor V Leiden, the prothrombin 20210A gene mutation, and hyperhomocysteinemia. Based on emerging knowledge of risk factors, several risk assessment models (RAMs) have been devised that stratify patients according to overall VTE risk, allowing thromboprophylaxis to be tailored appropriately. Compared with older risk assessment formulas, current RAMs are simpler and include specific recommendations for thromboprophylaxis based on the available scientific evidence. Consensus documents on VTE prevention classify patients into low-, moderate-, and high-risk categories. More recently, a new risk group, very high risk, has been described. Very-high-risk patients are especially prone to thromboembolic complications and need intensive and in some cases prolonged thromboprophylaxis. Copyright 2001 by W.B. Saunders Company.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11449339     DOI: 10.1016/s0037-1963(01)90094-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Hematol        ISSN: 0037-1963            Impact factor:   3.851


  65 in total

1.  Validation of the Caprini risk assessment model in plastic and reconstructive surgery patients.

Authors:  Christopher J Pannucci; Steven H Bailey; George Dreszer; Christine Fisher Wachtman; Justin W Zumsteg; Reda M Jaber; Jennifer B Hamill; Keith M Hume; J Peter Rubin; Peter C Neligan; Loree K Kalliainen; Ronald E Hoxworth; Andrea L Pusic; Edwin G Wilkins
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Practice guidelines and clinical risk assessment models: is it time to reform?

Authors:  Nariman Sepehrvand; Firouz Ghaderi Pakdel; Mohammad Hosein Rahimi-Rad; Babak Moosavi-Toomatari; Shahrzad Bazargan-Hejazi
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 2.796

3.  Toremifene decreases vertebral fractures in men younger than 80 years receiving androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Matthew R Smith; S Bruce Malkowicz; Michael K Brawer; Michael L Hancock; Ronald A Morton; Mitchell S Steiner
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Towards a precision medicine in venous thromboembolism associated to lung cancer.

Authors:  Luis Jara-Palomares; Teresa Elias-Hernandez; Maria Isabel Asensio-Cruz; Samira Marin-Romero; Remedios Otero-Candelera
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 5.  The Society for Translational Medicine: the assessment and prevention of venous thromboembolism after lung cancer surgery.

Authors:  Hui Li; Gening Jiang; Servet Bölükbas; Chun Chen; Haiquan Chen; Keneng Chen; Jun Chen; Xiangli Cui; Wentao Fang; Shugeng Gao; Sebastien Gilbert; Jianhua Fu; Xiangning Fu; Yasuhiro Hida; Shanqing Li; Xiaofei Li; Yin Li; Hecheng Li; Yongjun Li; Deruo Liu; Lunxu Liu; Jianxing He; Jie He; Giuseppe Marulli; Hiroyuki Oizumi; Marc de Perrot; René Horsleben Petersen; Yaron Shargall; Alan Sihoe; Qunyou Tan; Qun Wang; Shun Xu; Mei Yang; Yuanhua Yang; Zhentao Yu; Lanjun Zhang; Xun Zhang; Heng Zhao; Xiuyi Zhi
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Prognostic factors for VTE and bleeding in hospitalized medical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andrea J Darzi; Samer G Karam; Rana Charide; Itziar Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta; Mary Cushman; Michael K Gould; Lawrence Mbuagbaw; Frederick A Spencer; Alex C Spyropoulos; Michael B Streiff; Scott Woller; Neil A Zakai; Federico Germini; Marta Rigoni; Arnav Agarwal; Rami Z Morsi; Alfonso Iorio; Elie A Akl; Holger J Schünemann
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Korean guidelines for the prevention of venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Soo-Mee Bang; Moon Ju Jang; Doyeun Oh; Yeo-Kyeoung Kim; In Ho Kim; Sung-Soo Yoon; Hwi-Joong Yoon; Chul-Soo Kim; Seonyang Park
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 2.153

8.  Nationwide practice patterns for the use of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis among men undergoing radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Aaron Weinberg; Jason Wright; Christopher Deibert; Yu-Shiang Lu; Dawn Hershman; Alfred Neugut; Benjamin Spencer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Assessment of risk and prophylaxis for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in medically ill patients during their early days of hospital stay at a tertiary care center in a developing country.

Authors:  Ambarish Pandey; Nivedita Patni; Mansher Singh; Randeep Guleria
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2009-08-06

10.  Designing and implementing effective venous thromboembolism prevention protocols: lessons from collaborative efforts.

Authors:  Greg Maynard; Jason Stein
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.300

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.