Literature DB >> 34159527

Stimulus temporal uncertainty balances intersensory dominance.

Yi-Chuan Chen1, Pi-Chun Huang2.   

Abstract

Vision is typically dominant over audition or touch in human adults. One classic example is the Colavita visual dominance effect: The presentation of a tone sometimes goes undetected when it is paired with a flash even though it is well detected when presented alone. We investigated whether the Colavita visual dominance effect is modulated by stimulus uncertainty in the temporal and spatial domains. In a simple discrimination task, participants were asked to press a predesignated key when detecting a flash, another key when detecting a tone, and both keys when detecting both a flash and a tone. Temporal uncertainty was increased by introducing temporal jitter between trials (Experiment 1), and spatial uncertainty was increased by shifting the flash to different locations (Experiment 2). The Colavita visual dominance effect was reduced when temporal uncertainty was increased, while it remained similar when spatial uncertainty was increased. We therefore demonstrate a novel consideration, where increasing temporal uncertainty balances the competition between vision and audition, suggesting that people's degree of sensory dominance is malleable. Our result therefore highlights the concept that intersensory competition is susceptible to the temporal predictability of the stimulus, which provides critical insights into the design of effective warning systems in the field of ergonomics.
© 2021. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colavita visual dominance effect; Cross-modal; Intersensory competition; Spatial uncertainty; Temporal uncertainty

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34159527     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-021-01959-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  28 in total

1.  The crossmodal facilitation of visual object representations by sound: evidence from the backward masking paradigm.

Authors:  Yi-Chuan Chen; Charles Spence
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Separate attentional resources for vision and audition.

Authors:  David Alais; Concetta Morrone; David Burr
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  Is neocortex essentially multisensory?

Authors:  Asif A Ghazanfar; Charles E Schroeder
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-05-18       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 4.  The neural basis of the speed-accuracy tradeoff.

Authors:  Rafal Bogacz; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers; Birte U Forstmann; Sander Nieuwenhuis
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 13.837

5.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

6.  Different patterns of modality dominance across development.

Authors:  Wesley R Barnhart; Samuel Rivera; Christopher W Robinson
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2018-01

7.  Spatial coincidence modulates the Colavita visual dominance effect.

Authors:  Camille Koppen; Charles Spence
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Multisensory Competition Is Modulated by Sensory Pathway Interactions with Fronto-Sensorimotor and Default-Mode Network Regions.

Authors:  Sai Huang; You Li; Wei Zhang; Bao Zhang; Xingzhou Liu; Lei Mo; Qi Chen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Auditory stimuli automatically grab attention: Evidence from eye tracking and attentional manipulations.

Authors:  Carolyn M Dunifon; Samuel Rivera; Christopher W Robinson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 10.  Multisensory interplay reveals crossmodal influences on 'sensory-specific' brain regions, neural responses, and judgments.

Authors:  Jon Driver; Toemme Noesselt
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 17.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.