| Literature DB >> 17883868 |
Bong Geun Chung1, Jeong Won Park, Jia Sheng Hu, Carlos Huang, Edwin S Monuki, Noo Li Jeon.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Microfluidics is an enabling technology with a number of advantages over traditional tissue culture methods when precise control of cellular microenvironment is required. However, there are a number of practical and technical limitations that impede wider implementation in routine biomedical research. Specialized equipment and protocols required for fabrication and setting up microfluidic experiments present hurdles for routine use by most biology laboratories.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2007 PMID: 17883868 PMCID: PMC2071914 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6750-7-60
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Biotechnol ISSN: 1472-6750 Impact factor: 2.563
Figure 1A hybrid microfluidic-vacuum platform for interfacing with Petri dish. (A) Schematic design of the microfluidic device that show separate vacuum and fluidic channels. Side reservoirs (purple) contain buffer while buffer with FITC-Dextran (green) filled the middle reservoir. Parallel laminar flows from the three reservoirs generate stable gradients by diffusion. (B) Gradients of varying slope and profile generated in a single device. Two different gradient profiles generated at 0.5 mm and 6 mm downstream of the junction were visualized by FITC-Dextran profile. Gradient profiles were generated using 1 μl/min withdrawal rate. Experimentally measured and calculated gradient profiles were normalized for comparison. Scale bars are 100 μm.
Figure 2Real-time optical live/dead assay for mouse NPCs using microfluidics. (A) Schematic drawing of a fluidic network containing control and gradient region. (B-C) Mouse NPCs cultured in the control region of fluidic channel. Hydrogen peroxide (50 mM) was added into the right reservoir after preloading with propidium iodide (red). Cell death resulting from exposure to hydrogen peroxide was monitored by time-lapse microscopy. (D-E) Numbers of PI-positive cells increase towards the right side of the gradient chamber with longer exposure to hydrogen peroxide. Quantitative analysis of cell death in the control (F) and gradient region (G). Each bar shows the average for three independent experiments with standard errors of mean (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01). Scale bars are 100 μm.
Figure 3Chemotaxis of human breast cancer cells in a concentration gradient (0–50 ng/ml) of EGF. (A) First and last images of cells in the gradient region after 5 hours. (B) Directional plot of migration angle in 3–45 ng/ml EGF gradients, grouped in 10° intervals. (C) Cells inside the dotted lines (3–45 ng/ml EGF) were tracked and analyzed. The EGF gradient profile is visualized by FITC-dextran (10 kD) with a similar molecular weight to EGF. Scale bars are 20 μm.