Literature DB >> 17874029

Efficacy of different doses and time intervals of oral vitamin D supplementation with or without calcium in elderly nursing home residents.

V Chel1, H A H Wijnhoven, J H Smit, M Ooms, P Lips.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The effect of equivalent oral doses of vitamin D3 600 IU/day, 4200 IU/week and 18,000 IU/month on vitamin D status was compared in a randomized clinical trial in nursing home residents. A daily dose was more effective than a weekly dose, and a monthly dose was the least effective.
INTRODUCTION: It is assumed that equivalent daily, weekly or monthly doses of vitamin D3 equally influence vitamin D status. This was investigated in a randomized clinical trial in nursing home residents.
METHODS: The study was performed in ten nursing homes including 338 subjects (76 male and 262 female), with a mean age of 84 (+/- SD 6.3 years). They received oral vitamin D3 either 600 IU/day, or 4200 IU/week, or 18,000 IU/month or placebo. After 4 months, calcium was added during 2 weeks, 320 mg/day or 640 mg/day or placebo. OUTCOME: serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D), parathyroid hormone (PTH) and bone turnover markers. Statistical approach: linear multilevel analysis.
RESULTS: At baseline, mean serum 25(OH)D was 25.0 nmol/L (SD 10.9), and in 98%, it was lower than 50 nmol/L. After 4 months, mean serum 25(OH)D levels increased to 62.5 nmol/L (after daily vitamin D3 69.9 nmol/L, weekly 67.2 nmol/L and monthly 53.1 nmol/L, P < 0.001 between groups). Median serum PTH levels decreased by 23% (p < 0.001). Bone turnover markers did not decrease. Calcium supplementation had no effect on serum PTH and bone turnover.
CONCLUSION: Daily vitamin D was more effective than weekly, and monthly administration was the least effective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17874029      PMCID: PMC2277446          DOI: 10.1007/s00198-007-0465-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  25 in total

1.  Absorbability and cost effectiveness in calcium supplementation.

Authors:  R P Heaney; M S Dowell; J Bierman; C A Hale; A Bendich
Journal:  J Am Coll Nutr       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.169

2.  Calcium absorbability from milk products, an imitation milk, and calcium carbonate.

Authors:  R R Recker; A Bammi; M J Barger-Lux; R P Heaney
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 7.045

3.  Lower mobility and markers of bone resorption in the elderly.

Authors:  P Lips; F C van Ginkel; J C Netelenbos; A Wiersinga; W J van der Vijgh
Journal:  Bone Miner       Date:  1990-04

Review 4.  Role of Ca(2+) and vitamin D in the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  M A Rodríguez-Martínez; E C García-Cohen
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 12.310

Review 5.  Vitamin D and muscle function.

Authors:  M Pfeifer; B Begerow; H W Minne
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 6.  Calcium needs of the elderly to reduce fracture risk.

Authors:  R P Heaney
Journal:  J Am Coll Nutr       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Effect of four monthly oral vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) supplementation on fractures and mortality in men and women living in the community: randomised double blind controlled trial.

Authors:  Daksha P Trivedi; Richard Doll; Kay Tee Khaw
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-03-01

8.  Determinants of vitamin D status in patients with hip fracture and in elderly control subjects.

Authors:  P Lips; F C van Ginkel; M J Jongen; F Rubertus; W J van der Vijgh; J C Netelenbos
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 7.045

9.  Effect of vitamin D supplementation on wintertime and overall bone loss in healthy postmenopausal women.

Authors:  B Dawson-Hughes; G E Dallal; E A Krall; S Harris; L J Sokoll; G Falconer
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1991-10-01       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  The effect of vitamin D supplementation on vitamin D status and parathyroid function in elderly subjects.

Authors:  P Lips; A Wiersinga; F C van Ginkel; M J Jongen; J C Netelenbos; W H Hackeng; P D Delmas; W J van der Vijgh
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 5.958

View more
  54 in total

1.  Impact of vitamin D3 dietary supplement matrix on clinical response.

Authors:  Michael L Traub; John S Finnell; Anup Bhandiwad; Erica Oberg; Lena Suhaila; Ryan Bradley
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 5.958

2.  Comment on Chel et al.: efficacy of different doses and time intervals of oral vitamin D supplementation with or without calcium in elderly nursing home residents.

Authors:  R Vieth
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Effect of calcium and vitamin D supplementation on bone mineral density in women aged 65-71 years: a 3-year randomized population-based trial (OSTPRE-FPS).

Authors:  M Kärkkäinen; M Tuppurainen; K Salovaara; L Sandini; T Rikkonen; J Sirola; R Honkanen; J Jurvelin; E Alhava; H Kröger
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Optimal vitamin D supplementation strategies.

Authors:  Roger Bouillon
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 3.633

5.  Vitamin D Supplementation in Nursing Home Residents: Randomized Single Cholecalciferol Loading Protocol vs. Individualized Loading Dose Regimen.

Authors:  C Delomas; M Hertzog; T Vogel; P O Lang
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 4.075

6.  Skeletal and hormonal responses to vitamin D supplementation during sunlight deprivation in Antarctic expeditioners.

Authors:  S Iuliano-Burns; J Ayton; S Hillam; G Jones; K King; S Macleod; E Seeman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Vitamin D supplementation in nursing home patients: randomized controlled trial of standard daily dose versus individualized loading dose regimen.

Authors:  Hugo Wijnen; Dayenne Salemink; Lian Roovers; Diana Taekema; Hans de Boer
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 8.  Vitamin D Metabolism and Guidelines for Vitamin D Supplementation.

Authors:  Indra Ramasamy
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2020-12

Review 9.  Benefit-risk assessment of vitamin D supplementation.

Authors:  H A Bischoff-Ferrari; A Shao; B Dawson-Hughes; J Hathcock; E Giovannucci; W C Willett
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 10.  Vitamin D supplementation in older adults: searching for specific guidelines in nursing homes.

Authors:  Y Rolland; P de Souto Barreto; G Abellan Van Kan; C Annweiler; O Beauchet; H Bischoff-Ferrari; G Berrut; H Blain; M Bonnefoy; M Cesari; G Duque; M Ferry; O Guerin; O Hanon; B Lesourd; J Morley; A Raynaud-Simon; G Ruault; J-C Souberbielle; B Vellas
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.