Literature DB >> 25899914

Vitamin D supplementation in nursing home patients: randomized controlled trial of standard daily dose versus individualized loading dose regimen.

Hugo Wijnen1, Dayenne Salemink, Lian Roovers, Diana Taekema, Hans de Boer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Supplementation of cholecalciferol 800 IU daily appears to be insufficient to raise vitamin D levels to >75 nmol/l in nursing home (NH) patients.
OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to compare the efficacy of an individualized cholecalciferol loading dose (LD) regimen and a daily dose (DD) regimen of cholecalciferol 800 IU in reaching 25-OH vitamin D (25OHD) levels >75 nmol/l.
METHODS: A total of 30 NH patients with 25OHD levels <50 nmol/l were included. Patients were randomized using the minimization method in the LD or DD group. The cholecalciferol LD, calculated with an algorithm based on serum 25OHD level and body weight, was administered in divided doses of 50,000 IU twice a week, followed by a monthly maintenance dose of either 50,000 or 25,000 IU. The DD regimen consisted of cholecalciferol 800 IU daily for 26 weeks. Serum 25OHD, calcium, creatinine, phosphate, and parathyroid hormone were measured, and 2-minute walking test, handgrip strength, and timed get up and go test were assessed at baseline (T 0), after 5 weeks (T 5), 12 weeks (T 12), and 26 weeks (T 26). The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients with 25OHD levels >75 nmol/l at T 5. Secondary endpoints were the proportion of patients with 25OHD levels >75 nmol/l at T 26, safety of LD regimen, and improvement of performance tests with normalization of vitamin D levels.
RESULTS: Median baseline 25OHD levels (interquartile range) were comparable between the 14 DD and 16 LD patients: 20.9 (15.9-29.6) and 21.7 (16.4-32.8) nmol/l, respectively. Levels of 25OHD >75 nmol/l at T 5 were reached in 79 % of the 14 LD patients, but in none of the 13 DD patients (p < 0.001). At T 26, 25OHD levels >75 nmol/l were reached in 83 % of the 12 LD patients and in 30 % of the ten DD patients (p < 0.05). Side effects or hypercalcemia were not observed. No improvement of performance tests was observed.
CONCLUSION: In NH patients with severe 25OHD deficiency, an individualized calculated cholecalciferol LD is likely to be superior to a DD of cholecalciferol 800 IU in terms of the ability to rapidly normalize vitamin D levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25899914     DOI: 10.1007/s40266-015-0259-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs Aging        ISSN: 1170-229X            Impact factor:   3.923


  27 in total

Review 1.  Vitamin D deficiency.

Authors:  Michael F Holick
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-07-19       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  High-dose oral vitamin D3 supplementation in the elderly.

Authors:  C J Bacon; G D Gamble; A M Horne; M A Scott; I R Reid
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-12-20       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Vitamin D2 is much less effective than vitamin D3 in humans.

Authors:  Laura A G Armas; Bruce W Hollis; Robert P Heaney
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.958

4.  Validity of 3 physical performance measures in inpatient geriatric rehabilitation.

Authors:  Dina Brooks; Aileen M Davis; Gary Naglie
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.966

5.  Effect of annual intramuscular vitamin D on fracture risk in elderly men and women--a population-based, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  H Smith; F Anderson; H Raphael; P Maslin; S Crozier; C Cooper
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2007-11-12       Impact factor: 7.580

6.  Efficacy of different doses and time intervals of oral vitamin D supplementation with or without calcium in elderly nursing home residents.

Authors:  V Chel; H A H Wijnhoven; J H Smit; M Ooms; P Lips
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  The effects of vitamin D on skeletal muscle strength, muscle mass, and muscle power: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Charlotte Beaudart; Fanny Buckinx; Véronique Rabenda; Sophie Gillain; Etienne Cavalier; Justine Slomian; Jean Petermans; Jean-Yves Reginster; Olivier Bruyère
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 5.958

8.  No relation between vitamin D status and physical performance in the oldest old: results from the Belfrail study.

Authors:  Catharina Matheï; Gijs Van Pottelbergh; Bert Vaes; Wim Adriaensen; Didier Gruson; Jean-Marie Degryse
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 10.668

9.  Vitamin D supplementation in elderly or postmenopausal women: a 2013 update of the 2008 recommendations from the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis (ESCEO).

Authors:  R Rizzoli; S Boonen; M-L Brandi; O Bruyère; C Cooper; J A Kanis; J-M Kaufman; J D Ringe; G Weryha; J-Y Reginster
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 2.580

10.  National Osteoporosis Society vitamin D guideline summary.

Authors:  Terry J Aspray; Claire Bowring; William Fraser; Neil Gittoes; M Kassim Javaid; Helen Macdonald; Sanjeev Patel; Peter Selby; Nuttan Tanna; Roger M Francis
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 10.668

View more
  9 in total

1.  Vitamin D Supplementation in Nursing Home Residents: Randomized Single Cholecalciferol Loading Protocol vs. Individualized Loading Dose Regimen.

Authors:  C Delomas; M Hertzog; T Vogel; P O Lang
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 4.075

2.  Efficacy of a Standardized Oral Vitamin D Dosing Regimen in Nursing Home Residents.

Authors:  Marlous Toren-Wielema; Ruth Veenhuizen; Jan Willem Kappelle; Nic Veeger; Eric van Roon
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.923

3.  Vitamin D3 Loading Is Superior to Conventional Supplementation After Weight Loss Surgery in Vitamin D-Deficient Morbidly Obese Patients: a Double-Blind Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Maria Luger; Renate Kruschitz; Christian Kienbacher; Stefan Traussnigg; Felix B Langer; Gerhard Prager; Karin Schindler; Enikö Kallay; Friedrich Hoppichler; Michael Trauner; Michael Krebs; Rodrig Marculescu; Bernhard Ludvik
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  Vitamin D dosing considerations in COVID-19.

Authors:  William Simonson
Journal:  Geriatr Nurs       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 2.361

5.  Vitamin D oral intermittent treatment (DO IT) study, a randomized clinical trial with individual loading regimen.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Rothen; Jonas Rutishauser; Philipp N Walter; Kurt E Hersberger; Isabelle Arnet
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Definition, Assessment, and Management of Vitamin D Inadequacy: Suggestions, Recommendations, and Warnings from the Italian Society for Osteoporosis, Mineral Metabolism and Bone Diseases (SIOMMMS).

Authors:  Francesco Bertoldo; Luisella Cianferotti; Marco Di Monaco; Alberto Falchetti; Angelo Fassio; Davide Gatti; Luigi Gennari; Sandro Giannini; Giuseppe Girasole; Stefano Gonnelli; Nazzarena Malavolta; Salvatore Minisola; Mario Pedrazzoni; Domenico Rendina; Maurizio Rossini; Iacopo Chiodini
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 6.706

Review 7.  Vitamin D Supplementation and Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Present and Future.

Authors:  Ilaria Barchetta; Flavia Agata Cimini; Maria Gisella Cavallo
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 5.717

8.  Vitamin D: Daily vs. Monthly Use in Children and Elderly-What Is Going On?

Authors:  Luca Dalle Carbonare; Maria Teresa Valenti; Francesco Del Forno; Elena Caneva; Angelo Pietrobelli
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2017-06-24       Impact factor: 5.717

9.  Oral intermittent vitamin D substitution: influence of pharmaceutical form and dosage frequency on medication adherence: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Rothen; Jonas Rutishauser; Philipp N Walter; Kurt E Hersberger; Isabelle Arnet
Journal:  BMC Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2020-07-11       Impact factor: 2.483

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.