Literature DB >> 21837411

Sagittal spino-pelvic alignment failures following three column thoracic osteotomy for adult spinal deformity.

Virginie Lafage1, Justin S Smith, Shay Bess, Frank J Schwab, Christopher P Ames, Eric Klineberg, Vincent Arlet, Richard Hostin, Douglas C Burton, Christopher I Shaffrey.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Three column thoracic osteotomy (TCTO) is effective to correct rigid thoracic deformities, however, reasons for residual postoperative spinal deformity are poorly defined. Our objective was to evaluate risk factors for poor spino-pelvic alignment (SPA) following TCTO for adult spinal deformity (ASD).
METHODS: Multicenter, retrospective radiographic analysis of ASD patients treated with TCTO. Radiographic measures included: correction at the osteotomy site, thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic tilt (PT), and pelvic incidence (PI). Final SVA and PT were assessed to determine if ideal SPA (SVA < 4 cm, PT < 25°) was achieved. Differences between the ideal (IDEAL) and failed (FAIL) SPA groups were evaluated.
RESULTS: A total of 41 consecutive ASD patients treated with TCTO were evaluated. TCTO significantly decreased TK, maximum coronal Cobb angle, SVA and PT (P < 0.05). Ideal SPA was achieved in 32 (78%) and failed in 9 (22%) patients. The IDEAL and FAIL groups had similar total fusion levels and similar focal, SVA and PT correction (P > 0.05). FAIL group had larger pre- and post-operative SVA, PT and PI and a smaller LL than IDEAL (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Poor SPA occurred in 22% of TCTO patients despite similar operative procedures and deformity correction as patients in the IDEAL group. Greater pre-operative PT and SVA predicted failed post-operative SPA. Alternative or additional correction procedures should be considered when planning TCTO for patients with large sagittal global malalignment, otherwise patients are at risk for suboptimal correction and poor outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21837411      PMCID: PMC3326123          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-1967-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  25 in total

1.  Sagittal plane alignment of the spine and gravity: a radiological and clinical evaluation.

Authors:  Jean Legaye; Ginette Duval-Beaupère
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 0.500

2.  Center of gravity and radiographic posture analysis: a preliminary review of adult volunteers and adult patients affected by scoliosis.

Authors:  Abdelkrim Benchikh El Fegoun; Frank Schwab; Lorenzo Gamez; Nicolas Champain; Wafa Skalli; Jean-Pierre Farcy
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Sagittal alignment of spine and pelvis regulated by pelvic incidence: standard values and prediction of lordosis.

Authors:  C Boulay; C Tardieu; J Hecquet; C Benaim; B Mouilleseaux; C Marty; D Prat-Pradal; J Legaye; G Duval-Beaupère; J Pélissier
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-09-23       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Correlation of radiographic parameters and clinical symptoms in adult scoliosis.

Authors:  Steven D Glassman; Sigurd Berven; Keith Bridwell; William Horton; John R Dimar
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  The impact of positive sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity.

Authors:  Steven D Glassman; Keith Bridwell; John R Dimar; William Horton; Sigurd Berven; Frank Schwab
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Spino-pelvic parameters after surgery can be predicted: a preliminary formula and validation of standing alignment.

Authors:  Virginie Lafage; Frank Schwab; Shaleen Vira; Ashish Patel; Benjamin Ungar; Jean-Pierre Farcy
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Is there an optimal patient stance for obtaining a lateral 36" radiograph? A critical comparison of three techniques.

Authors:  William C Horton; Courtney W Brown; Keith H Bridwell; Steven D Glassman; Se-Il Suk; Charles W Cha
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  [Validation of a tool to measure pelvic and spinal parameters of sagittal balance].

Authors:  L Rillardon; N Levassor; P Guigui; P Wodecki; L Cardinne; A Templier; W Skalli
Journal:  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot       Date:  2003-05

9.  A pedicle subtraction osteotomy as an adjunctive tool in the surgical treatment of a rigid thoracolumbar hyperkyphosis; a preliminary report.

Authors:  Piet J M van Loon; Gijs van Stralen; Corne J M van Loon; Job L C van Susante
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2006-01-27       Impact factor: 4.166

10.  Pedicle subtraction osteotomy for the treatment of fixed sagittal imbalance.

Authors:  Keith H Bridwell; Stephen J Lewis; Lawrence G Lenke; Christy Baldus; Kathy Blanke
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  13 in total

1.  Posterior thoracic osteotomies.

Authors:  Ferran Pellisé; Alba Vila-Casademunt
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-04-30

2.  Relationship between sagittal spinal alignment and the incidence of vertebral fracture in menopausal women with osteoporosis: a multicenter longitudinal follow-up study.

Authors:  Jian Dai; Xiaojuan Yu; Shushu Huang; Lu Fan; Guotai Zhu; Hailang Sun; Xiaoming Tang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Two level pedicle substraction osteotomies for the treatment of severe fixed sagittal plane deformity: computer software-assisted preoperative planning and assessing.

Authors:  Yunus Atici; Yunus Emre Akman; Mehmet Bulent Balioglu; Deniz Kargin; Mehmet Akif Kaygusuz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Cervical spine alignment following lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy for sagittal imbalance.

Authors:  Ibrahim Obeid; Anthony Boniello; Louis Boissiere; Anouar Bourghli; Vincent Pointillart; Olivier Gille; Virginie Lafage; Jean-Marc Vital
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Junctional spinal disorders in operated adult spinal deformities: present understanding and future perspectives.

Authors:  V Arlet; M Aebi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Osteotomies in the treatment of spinal deformities: indications, classification, and surgical planning.

Authors:  Bassel Diebo; Shian Liu; Virginie Lafage; Frank Schwab
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-05-11

7.  Is pelvic incidence a constant, as everyone knows? Changes of pelvic incidence in surgically corrected adult sagittal deformity.

Authors:  Jung-Hee Lee; Ki-Ho Na; Jin-Hyok Kim; Ho-Yeon Jeong; Dong-Gune Chang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Simple prediction method of lumbar lordosis for planning of lumbar corrective surgery: radiological analysis in a Korean population.

Authors:  Chong Suh Lee; Sung Soo Chung; Se Jun Park; Dong Min Kim; Seong Kee Shin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Single Level Proximal Thoracic Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy for Fixed Hyperkyphotic Deformity: Surgical Technique and Patient Series.

Authors:  Ibrahim Obeid; Bassel G Diebo; Louis Boissiere; Anouar Bourghli; Derek T Cawley; Daniel Larrieu; Vincent Pointillart; Vincent Challier; Jean Marc Vital; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown)       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 2.703

10.  Full-Body Radiographic Analysis of Postoperative Deviations From Age-Adjusted Alignment Goals in Adult Spinal Deformity Correction and Related Compensatory Recruitment.

Authors:  Peter G Passias; Cyrus M Jalai; Bassel G Diebo; Dana L Cruz; Gregory W Poorman; Aaron J Buckland; Louis M Day; Samantha R Horn; Barthélemy Liabaud; Renaud Lafage; Alexandra Soroceanu; Joseph F Baker; Shearwood McClelland; Jonathan H Oren; Thomas J Errico; Frank J Schwab; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-04-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.