Literature DB >> 17869138

Comparison of risk-scoring methods in predicting the immediate outcome after elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery.

T Y Tang1, S R Walsh, T R Fanshawe, V Seppi, U Sadat, P D Hayes, K Varty, M E Gaunt, J R Boyle.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND &
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to apply three simple risk - scoring systems to prospectively collected data on all elective open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA) operations in the Cambridge Academic Vascular Unit over a 6 - year period (January 1998 to January 2004), to compare their predictive values and to evaluate their validity with respect to prediction of mortality and post-operative complications.
METHODS: 204 patients underwent elective open infra-renal AAA repair. Data were prospectively collected and risk assessment scores were calculated for mortality and morbidity according to the Glasgow Aneurysm Score (GAS), VBHOM (Vascular Biochemistry and Haematology Outcome Models) and Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress (E-PASS).
RESULTS: The mortality rate was 6.3% (13/204) and 59% (121/204) experienced a post-operative complication (30-day outcome). For GAS, VBHOM and E-PASS the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis for prediction of in-hospital mortality showed area under the curve (AUC) of 0.84 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76 to 0.92; p<0.0001), 0.82 (95% CI, 0.68 to 0.95; p=0.0001) and 0.92 (95% CI, 0.87 to 0.97; p<0.0001) respectively. There were also significant correlations between post-operative complications and length of hospital stay and each of the three scores, but the correlation was substantially higher in the case of E-PASS.
CONCLUSIONS: All three scoring systems accurately predicted the risk of mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing elective open AAA repair. Among these, E-PASS seemed to be the most accurate predictor in this patient population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17869138     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2007.07.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg        ISSN: 1078-5884            Impact factor:   7.069


  10 in total

1.  Prediction of anastomotic leak and its prognosis in digestive surgery.

Authors:  Yoshio Haga; Yasuo Wada; Hitoshi Takeuchi; Koji Ikejiri; Masakazu Ikenaga
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Current status of the treatment of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  Linda J Wang; Anand M Prabhakar; Christopher J Kwolek
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2018-04

3.  Letter to the editor: new equations for predicting postoperative risk in patients with hip fracture.

Authors:  Zhijie Zhou; Shunwu Fan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Evaluation of estimation of physiologic ability and surgical stress to predict in-hospital mortality in cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Atsushi Kotera; Yoshio Haga; Junichi Kei; Minoru Okamoto; Katsuhiro Seo
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 2.078

5.  Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress (E-PASS) versus modified E-PASS for prediction of postoperative complications in elderly patients who undergo gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Yuki Kitano; Masaaki Iwatsuki; Junji Kurashige; Daisuke Kuroda; Keisuke Kosumi; Yoshifumi Baba; Yasuo Sakamoto; Yuji Miyamoto; Naoya Yoshida; Yoshio Haga; Hideo Baba
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Can the physiologic ability and surgical stress (E-PASS) scoring system predict operative morbidity after distal pancreatectomy?

Authors:  Daisuke Hashimoto; Hiroshi Takamori; Yasuo Sakamoto; Hiroshi Tanaka; Masahiko Hirota; Hideo Baba
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2010-06-26       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 7.  Concept of the aortic aneurysm repair-related surgical stress: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Demetrios N Moris; Michalis I Kontos; Eleftherios I Mantonakis; Antonios K Athanasiou; Eleftherios D Spartalis; Chris N Bakoyiannis; George P Chrousos; Sotirios E Georgopoulos
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-09-15

Review 8.  Cytokines as biomarkers of inflammatory response after open versus endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a systematic review.

Authors:  Diamantis I Tsilimigras; Fragiska Sigala; Georgios Karaolanis; Ioannis Ntanasis-Stathopoulos; Eleftherios Spartalis; Michael Spartalis; Nikolaos Patelis; Alexandros Papalampros; Chandler Long; Demetrios Moris
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 6.150

9.  Results of Open and Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair According to the E-PASS Score.

Authors:  Fábio Hüsemann Menezes; Bárbara Ferrarezi; Moisés Amâncio de Souza; Susyanne Lavor Cosme; Giovani José Dal Poggetto Molinari
Journal:  Braz J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-02

10.  Assessment of postoperative complications using E-PASS and APACHE II in patients undergoing oral and maxillofacial surgery.

Authors:  Kiyohide Ishihata; Yasuyuki Kakihana; Takuya Yoshimura; Juri Murakami; Soichiro Toyodome; Hiroshi Hijioka; Etsuro Nozoe; Norifumi Nakamura
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2018-04-05
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.