Literature DB >> 21184072

Prediction of anastomotic leak and its prognosis in digestive surgery.

Yoshio Haga1, Yasuo Wada, Hitoshi Takeuchi, Koji Ikejiri, Masakazu Ikenaga.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leak (AL) is a dangerous postoperative complication in gastrointestinal surgery. The present study focuses on whether our prediction scoring system, "Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress" (E-PASS), could predict occurrence of AL and its prognosis in various kinds of gastrointestinal surgical procedures.
METHODS: We prospectively investigated parameters of E-PASS, absence or presence of AL, and in-hospital mortality in 6,005 patients who underwent elective digestive surgery with alimentary tract reconstruction in 45 acute care hospitals in Japan between 1 April 2002 and 31 March 2007.
RESULTS: Incidences of AL were 19.6% for esophagectomy via right thoracotomy and laparotomy, 11.7% for pancreaticoduodenectomy, 7.4% for low anterior resection, 4.0% for total gastrectomy, 1.8% for open distal gastrectomy, 1.3% for open colectomy, for an overall incidence of 4.1%. The incidence in each procedure significantly correlated with median value of surgical stress score of the E-PASS (R = 0.78, n = 11, p = 0.0048). The incidences of AL increased when Total Risk Points (TRP) of the E-PASS increased; 1.1% at the TRP range of <500, 2.8% at 500 to <1,000, 4.8% at 1,000 to <1,500, and 13.6% at ≥ 1,500 (p < 0.0001). In patients who suffered from AL, an in-hospital mortality rate at TRP < 1,000 was significantly lower than that at TRP of ≥ 1,000 (1.1 vs. 15.9%; p = 0.00019).
CONCLUSIONS: The E-PASS, requiring only nine variables, may be useful in predicting AL and its prognosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21184072     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-010-0922-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  23 in total

1.  Evaluation of an Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress (E-PASS) scoring system to predict postoperative risk: a multicenter prospective study.

Authors:  Y Haga; S Ikei; Y Wada; H Takeuchi; H Sameshima; O Kimura; T Furuya
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Anastomotic leakage after lower gastrointestinal anastomosis: men are at a higher risk.

Authors:  Magdalena A Lipska; Ian P Bissett; Bryan R Parry; Arend E H Merrie
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.872

3.  Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress (E-PASS) as a new prediction scoring system for postoperative morbidity and mortality following elective gastrointestinal surgery.

Authors:  Y Haga; S Ikei; M Ogawa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Comparison of surgical outcome using the prediction scoring system of E-PASS for thoracic surgery.

Authors:  Shin-ichi Yamashita; Yoshio Haga; Etsuo Nemoto; Naoko Imanishi; Morio Ohta; Katsunobu Kawahara
Journal:  Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2006-09

5.  Smoking and alcohol abuse are major risk factors for anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery.

Authors:  L T Sørensen; T Jørgensen; L T Kirkeby; J Skovdal; B Vennits; P Wille-Jørgensen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Pelvic drainage and other risk factors for leakage after elective anterior resection in rectal cancer patients: a prospective study of 978 patients.

Authors:  Chien Yuh Yeh; Chung Rong Changchien; Jeng-Yi Wang; Jinn-Shiun Chen; Hong Hwa Chen; Jy-Ming Chiang; Reiping Tang
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Anterior resection for rectal cancer with mesorectal excision: a prospective evaluation of 622 patients.

Authors:  Wai Lun Law; Kin Wah Chu
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  E-PASS (The Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress) scoring system helps the prediction of postoperative morbidity and mortality in thoracic surgery.

Authors:  S Yamashita; Y Haga; E Nemoto; S Nagai; M Ohta
Journal:  Eur Surg Res       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.745

9.  Evaluation of estimation of physiologic ability and surgical stress (E-PASS) to predict the postoperative risk for hip fracture in elder patients.

Authors:  J Hirose; H Mizuta; J Ide; K Nomura
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2008-01-04       Impact factor: 3.067

10.  Perioperative vasopressors are associated with an increased risk of gastrointestinal anastomotic leakage.

Authors:  Tanya Zakrison; Bartolomeu A Nascimento; Lorraine N Tremblay; Alex Kiss; Sandro B Rizoli
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.352

View more
  23 in total

1.  Preoperative Glycosylated Hemoglobin Levels Predict Anastomotic Leak After Esophagectomy with Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis.

Authors:  Akihiko Okamura; Masayuki Watanabe; Yu Imamura; Satoshi Kamiya; Kotaro Yamashita; Takanori Kurogochi; Shinji Mine
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  [Management of postoperative complications following esophagectomy].

Authors:  D Schubert; St Dalicho; L Flohr; F Benedix; H Lippert
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 3.  To drain or not to drain: a cumulative meta-analysis of the use of routine abdominal drains after pancreatic resection.

Authors:  Aart A van der Wilt; Mariëlle M E Coolsen; Ignace H J T de Hingh; Gert Jan van der Wilt; Hans Groenewoud; Cornelis H C Dejong; Ronald M van Dam
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 3.647

4.  Use of vasopressors during esophagectomy is not associated with increased risk of anastomotic leak.

Authors:  Kevin J Walsh; Hao Zhang; Kay See Tan; Alessia Pedoto; Dawn P Desiderio; Gregory W Fischer; Manjit S Bains; David R Jones; Daniela Molena; David Amar
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 3.429

5.  Ileostomy reversal with handsewn techniques. Short-term outcomes in a teaching hospital.

Authors:  Gaetano Luglio; Francesco Terracciano; Mariano Cesare Giglio; Michele Sacco; Roberto Peltrini; Viviana Sollazzo; Emanuela Spadarella; Cristina Bucci; Giovanni Domenico De Palma; Luigi Bucci
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  The predictive value of plasma cytokines on gastroesophageal anastomotic leakage at an early stage in patients undergoing esophagectomy.

Authors:  Jie-Qiong Song; Yi-Zhou He; Yuan Fang; Wei Wu; Ming Zhong
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Total Risk Points Predict Short- and Long-term Outcomes Following Colorectal Cancer Resection in Older Patients.

Authors:  Shintaro Hashimoto; Kazuo To; Hideo Wada; Yuka Sakakibara; Keisuke Ozeki; Michihiko Komaki; Masamichi Kondo
Journal:  Cancer Diagn Progn       Date:  2022-05-03

Review 8.  [Characteristics of postoperative peritonitis].

Authors:  J F Lock; C Eckmann; C-T Germer
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 0.955

9.  Development and validation of a nomogram to predict anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  Wen-Quan Yu; Hui-Jiang Gao; Guo-Dong Shi; Jia-Yu Tang; Hua-Feng Wang; Shi-Yu Hu; Yu-Cheng Wei
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 3.005

10.  Hybrid esophagectomy for oesophageal cancer: long-term results. A single-centre experience.

Authors:  Lucie Hlaváčová; Radek Vrba; Čestmír Neoral; René Aujeský; Martin Stašek; Josef Chudáček; Katherine Vomáčková; David Vrána; Martin Sněhota
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 1.195

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.