Literature DB >> 17848318

Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy with Gynemesh as graft material--experience and results.

Neena Agarwala1, Nancye Hasiak, Marcia Shade.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of Prolene (Ethicon, Inc., Johnson and Johnson, Somerville, NJ) graft for sacral colpopexy and ease of use laparoscopically.
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis (Canadian Task Force classification II-1).
SETTING: Academic university hospital. PATIENTS: Seventy-four patients with recurrent prolapse of the apex or severe uterine prolapse (stage II-IV).
INTERVENTIONS: Seventy-four patients with recurrent prolapse of the apex or severe uterine prolapse (stage II-IV) underwent laparoscopic sacral colpopexy or cervicopexy with Gynemesh (Ethicon, Inc.) used as the graft material.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Seventy-four patients, from March 2003 through March 2006, underwent a sacropexy. Fifty-one patients had recurrent apical prolapse, 22 patients had uterovaginal prolapse stage III or IV, and 1 patient had uterovaginal prolapse stage II and insisted on retaining the uterus. Fifty-two patients also had a concurrent sling procedure performed for incontinence. Intraoperative and postoperative complications included 1 middle sacral bleed managed by suturing in the middle sacral region and 1 postoperative cervical abscess requiring reoperation and removal of the graft at 10 days. All patients were evaluated at 2 weeks and 6 weeks after surgery, and pelvic examination was performed. They were then followed up biannually. Median age was 63 years (range 48-76 years), and median body mass index was 35 (range 24-41). Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy or cervico or uteropexy was performed successfully in 72 patients. Median blood loss was less than 25 mL (range 25-150 mL), and the median hospital stay was 1 day (range 1-2 days). One surgery was terminated because of dense rectosigmoid adhesions to the cuff requiring a laparotomy and partial sigmoid resection because of redundancy and postdissection trauma to the sigmoid. Another procedure was completed as a Prolift (Johnson and Johnson) procedure because of finding of a prior Mersilene (Phillips Sumika Polypropylene Co., Houston, TX) mesh that was densely adherent to the pelvic contents. Seventy patients are extremely happy and satisfied with the surgery. Postoperative recovery has been uneventful, and subjective and objective cure is 97% and 100%, respectively. One patient with sacrouteropexy still has stage I prolapse of her cervix, but it feels well supported. There have been no cases of colpopexy graft exposure or recurrence with a median follow-up of 24 months (range 9-36 months). The patient with cervical abscess and graft removal has also healed with no recurrance of her prolapse.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy or cervicopexy is a safe and effective procedure with excellent results. Gynemesh (Ethicon, Inc.), a wide-pore polypropelene mesh seems to be an excellent graft material with low risk for graft infection (1.4%) or erosion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17848318     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2007.03.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol        ISSN: 1553-4650            Impact factor:   4.137


  13 in total

1.  Laparoscopic sacral colpoperineopexy: abdominal versus abdominal-vaginal posterior graft attachment.

Authors:  Colleen D McDermott; Jean Park; Colin L Terry; Patrick J Woodman; Douglass S Hale
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Implementation of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy--a single centre's experience.

Authors:  Filip Claerhout; Jan Paul Roovers; Paul Lewi; Jasper Verguts; Dirk De Ridder; Jan Deprest
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-05-29

3.  Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: an observational study of functional and anatomical outcomes.

Authors:  Natalia Price; Alex Slack; Simon R Jackson
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 4.  Complications of pelvic organ prolapse surgery and methods of prevention.

Authors:  Renaud de Tayrac; Loic Sentilhes
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy with transcervical morcellation and sacrocervicopexy for the treatment of uterine prolapse.

Authors:  Sybil G Dessie; Michele Park; Peter L Rosenblatt
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 6.  Uterus preservation in pelvic organ prolapse surgery.

Authors:  Alessandro Zucchi; Massimo Lazzeri; Massimo Porena; Luigi Mearini; Elisabetta Costantini
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 14.432

7.  The vaginally assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a pilot study.

Authors:  Stavros Athanasiou; Themos Grigoriadis; Ioannis Chatzipapas; Athanasios Protopapas; Aris Antsaklis
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 8.  [Reconstructive pelvic surgery. Current status and future perspectives].

Authors:  J N Nyarangi-Dix; N Djakovic; M Kurosch; A Haferkamp; M Hohenfellner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 9.  Apical prolapse.

Authors:  Matthew D Barber; Christopher Maher
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.894

10.  Laparoscopic sacropexy: a retrospective analysis of the subjective outcome in 310 cases.

Authors:  B Bojahr; G Tchartchian; M Waldschmidt; R Ohlinger; R L De Wilde
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2011-09-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.