Literature DB >> 25990208

Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy with transcervical morcellation and sacrocervicopexy for the treatment of uterine prolapse.

Sybil G Dessie1,2,3, Michele Park4, Peter L Rosenblatt5,6.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective is to describe our surgical approach for management of uterine prolapse using 5-mm skin incisions and transcervical morcellation.
METHODS: This video presents a novel approach for laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy, bilateral salpingectomy, and sacrocervicopexy using only 5-mm skin incisions and transcervical morcellation. The procedure begins with a laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy with bilateral salpingectomy. A classic intrafascial supracervical hysterectomy (CISH) instrument is then used transvaginally to core the endocervical canal. A disposable morcellator is placed through the remaining cervix to morcellate the uterus and fallopian tubes. Following morcellation, the handle of the morcellator is removed, and it is used during the remainder of the surgery as an access cannula for the sacrocervicopexy. The polypropylene mesh is introduced through this cannula. It is secured to the anterior and posterior vaginal fascia with a suture that is also introduced through the transcervical port. At the conclusion of the surgery, a previously placed 0 Vicryl purse-string suture at the ectocervix is tied down as a cerclage around the cervix once the cannula is removed.
CONCLUSIONS: The transcervical morcellation technique demonstrated in this video allows the surgeon to maintain 5-mm skin incisions and core the endocervical canal during a laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy with sacrocervicopexy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laparoscopy; Morcellation; Pelvic organ prolapse; Sacrocervicopexy

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25990208     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-015-2732-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  6 in total

1.  Differences in recurrent prolapse at 1 year after total vs supracervical hysterectomy and robotic sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Erinn M Myers; Lauren Siff; Blake Osmundsen; Elizabeth Geller; Catherine A Matthews
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Lifetime risk of undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Fiona J Smith; C D'Arcy J Holman; Rachael E Moorin; Nicolas Tsokos
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Mesh erosion in abdominal sacral colpopexy with and without concomitant hysterectomy.

Authors:  Jennifer M Wu; Ellen C Wells; Andrew F Hundley; Annamarie Connolly; Kathryn S Williams; Anthony G Visco
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for severe vaginal vault prolapse: five-year outcome.

Authors:  Jim W Ross; Mark Preston
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.137

Review 5.  Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women.

Authors:  Christopher Maher; Benjamin Feiner; Kaven Baessler; Corina Schmid
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-04-30

6.  Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy with Gynemesh as graft material--experience and results.

Authors:  Neena Agarwala; Nancye Hasiak; Marcia Shade
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.137

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.