Literature DB >> 20740358

Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: an observational study of functional and anatomical outcomes.

Natalia Price1, Alex Slack, Simon R Jackson.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: the aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical and functional outcomes of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy, in particular its effect on female sexual function.
METHODS: a retrospective observational study of women undergoing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy between February 2005 and March 2009 was undertaken. Pelvic organ support was assessed objectively using the pelvic organ prolapse quantification scale (POP-Q). Functional outcomes were assessed using the International Consultation on Incontinence questionnaire for vaginal symptoms (ICIQ-VS), both preoperatively and at 6-36 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: eighty-four women with a mean age of 65 years (range, 49-78 years) were studied. At follow-up in clinic, all women had good vault support (mean point C, -8.9; range, 10 to -8). Subjective improvements in prolapse symptoms and sexual well-being were observed with significant reductions in the respective questionnaire scores.
CONCLUSIONS: our results confirm previous findings that laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy is a safe and efficacious surgical treatment for post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse. It provides excellent apical support and good functional outcome with overall improvement in sexual function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20740358     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-010-1241-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  19 in total

Review 1.  Surgical management of the apical vaginal defect.

Authors:  Brian J Flynn; George D Webster
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.309

2.  The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction.

Authors:  R C Bump; A Mattiasson; K Bø; L P Brubaker; J O DeLancey; P Klarskov; B L Shull; A R Smith
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Laser video-laparoscopic colpopexy.

Authors:  A Ostrzeński
Journal:  Ginekol Pol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.232

4.  Long term review of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  P J Higgs; H-L Chua; A R B Smith
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 6.531

5.  Abdominal sacrocolpopexy for vault prolapse without burial of mesh: a case series.

Authors:  Sohier Elneil; Alfred S Cutner; Mary Remy; Andrew T Leather; Philip Toozs-Hobson; Brian Wise
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 6.531

6.  Vaginal versus abdominal reconstructive surgery for the treatment of pelvic support defects: a prospective randomized study with long-term outcome evaluation.

Authors:  J T Benson; V Lucente; E McClellan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Development and psychometric evaluation of the ICIQ Vaginal Symptoms Questionnaire: the ICIQ-VS.

Authors:  N Price; S R Jackson; K Avery; S T Brookes; P Abrams
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 6.531

8.  Long-term vaginal ring pessary use: discontinuation rates and adverse events.

Authors:  S Sarma; T Ying; K H Moore
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 6.531

Review 9.  Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Ingrid E Nygaard; Rebecca McCreery; Linda Brubaker; AnnaMarie Connolly; Geoff Cundiff; Anne M Weber; Halina Zyczynski
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Abdominal sacral colpopexy or vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Christopher F Maher; Aymen M Qatawneh; Peter L Dwyer; Marcus P Carey; Ann Cornish; Philip J Schluter
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 8.661

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Uterine-preserving POP surgery.

Authors:  Robert Gutman; Christopher Maher
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 2.  Complications of pelvic organ prolapse surgery and methods of prevention.

Authors:  Renaud de Tayrac; Loic Sentilhes
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Mesh-related complications of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Georgina Baines; Natalia Price; Helen Jefferis; Rufus Cartwright; Simon R Jackson
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Complications and reoperations after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with a mean follow-up of 4 years.

Authors:  David Vandendriessche; Julie Sussfeld; Géraldine Giraudet; Jean-Philippe Lucot; Hélène Behal; Michel Cosson
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  A randomised controlled trial of abdominal versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: LAS study.

Authors:  R M Freeman; K Pantazis; A Thomson; J Frappell; L Bombieri; P Moran; M Slack; P Scott; M Waterfield
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 6.  Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  S Manodoro; E Werbrouck; J Veldman; K Haest; R Corona; F Claerhout; G Coremans; D De Ridder; F Spelzini; J Deprest
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2011

7.  Laparoscopic uterovaginal prolapse surgery in the elderly: feasibility and outcomes.

Authors:  Samuel W King; Helen Jefferis; Simon Jackson; Alexander G Marfin; Natalia Price
Journal:  Gynecol Surg       Date:  2017-04-11

8.  Laparoscopic inguinal ligament suspension versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Chunbo Li; Zhiyuan Dai; Huimin Shu
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Sexual Activity and Dyspareunia 1 Year After Surgical Repair of Pelvic Organ Prolapse.

Authors:  Emily S Lukacz; Amaanti Sridhar; Christopher J Chermansky; David D Rahn; Heidi S Harvie; Marie G Gantz; R Edward Varner; Nicole B Korbly; Donna Mazloomdoost
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 7.623

10.  A Comparison of Complications between Open Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy and Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy for the Treatment of Vault Prolapse.

Authors:  Anne-Lotte W M Coolen; Anique M J van Oudheusden; Hugo W F van Eijndhoven; Tim P F M van der Heijden; Rutger A Stokmans; Ben Willem J Mol; Marlies Y Bongers
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2013-09-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.